AIDS: THE UNTOLD STORY
By Dr. Stanley Monteith
It has been said that "men become accomplices to those
tragedies which they fail to oppose". Nowhere is that truth more
clearly demonstrated than in the apocalypse currently unfolding across the
world as the HIV epidemic continues its silent spread from land to land.
As of January 1, 1997 over 350,000 Americans will be dead, another 200,000
will be in the terminal stages of their illness, and an additional six
hundred thousand to a million more will be HIV infected. Barring the
possibility that protease inhibitors can permanently block HIV-induced
immunosuppression, almost all those currently infected will progress to
terminal-stage illness and death.
The enormity of the tragedy facing America today, however, is dwarfed by
the tragedy sweeping Asia and Africa. As of mid-1994, in the small
landlocked nation of Malawi in Southern Africa, 30% of high school
students and 68% of college students tested were found to be HIV infected.
(1) Recent testing of soldiers throughout Africa revealed a 50% HIV
infection rate, while testing of military units in Zimbabwe revealed a 90%
infection rate. It is estimated that in Zimbabwe between one-quarter and
one-third of President Mugabe's Cabinet have already perished from AIDS.
(2)
In the May, 1996 issue of Special Warfare, a magazine distributed
primarily to members of Special Operations (Military Intelligence) units,
Dr. Brian Sullivan writes: "The immediate future may present
other daunting challenges...Because of complicated social and cultural
reasons, AIDS already infects a high proportion of the military and
civilian officials of Zaire, Uganda, Kenya, Zambia and other central
African countries. In some or all of these countries government
establishments may collapse in the next 10-15 years...civil rule may also
erode or break down in parts of North Africa, the Middle East, India and
Southeast Asia." (3)
In Uganda, the average life span of men has fallen to 30 years, while the
average life span of women has fallen to 27 years. (4) A missionary friend
living in Africa reports that there are over nine million children in sub-
Saharan Africa who have lost their mothers to AIDS, and that one in every
four miners working in South Africa are HIV positive. These statistics
were communicated to me by E-mail from Vern Tisdalle, a missionary
stationed in Johannesburg, South Africa. It is estimated that by the turn
of the century the epicenter of the epidemic will have shifted from Africa
to Asia. Indian health authorities currently estimate that "as many
as 20 million or even 50 million Indians will be infected by the year
2000, and that there will be more AIDS patients than hospital beds".
(5) On June 1, 1996 Reuter's News Service reported that Dr. William
Blattner of the Institute of Human Virology at the University of Maryland
estimated that 100 million people will be HIV infected by the year 2000.
(6) In both Asia and Africa, HIV infection (AIDS) is primarily a
heterosexual disease, while in Western nations the illness is found almost
exclusively among homosexuals, IV drug users, and more recently among
heterosexual blacks. Why is there such variance between the continents?
There are several possible explanations. Dr. Max Essex, Director of the
Harvard AIDS Institute, has reported that the predominant subtype of the
virus found in Western nations is HIV-I: subtype B, whereas in both Asia
and Africa the predominant subtypes are C and E. Dr. Essex believes that
the Langerhans cells which line the vagina and oral cavities are the
primary sites for HIV infection. In laboratory experiments using
Langerhans cell cultures, investigators have discovered that HIV I:
subtype B is only minimally infectious to LH cells, whereas subtypes C and
E are highly infectious. This study may explain why we find heterosexual
spread of HIV infection in Asia and Africa where subtypes HIV I: C and E
predominate, but only rarely in Western nations where subtype B is found.
It is presumed that homosexuals and IV drug users contract HIV I: subtype
B readily because of their lifestyles involving needle sharing and rectal
sex. (7) Dr. Essex's work, however, does not explain the heterosexual
epidemic developing within black America today. This aberration may be
explained by studies which have found that certain genetic factors
predispose blacks to HIV infection. Researchers have recently identified
two mutated genes in some whites that are not found in blacks; these
altered genes protect their hosts from HIV infection. There may well be
other yet unrecognized genetic factors which confer complete or partial
immunity to whites, but these factors have yet to be identified. (8,9)
Shortly after the year 2000 blacks will make up the majority of new HIV
infections occurring here in the United States. (10) That supposition is
reflected in statistics released by the Department of Health in Virginia
in 1996. Because of the 10-year latency period between HIV infection and
immunodeficiency, AIDS statistics reflect the status of the epidemic 10
years ago rather than what is happening today. Virginia's current AIDS
statistics suggest equal numbers of blacks and whites infected while HIV
statistics reveal that 64% of recent infections are among blacks while
only 31.8% are among whites. These figures become even more frightening
when one reflects that blacks make up only 22.6% of Virginia's population.
(11)
What most people do not realize is that all efforts to utilize public
health measures to slow spread of the HIV epidemic have been thwarted.
Why?
(A) Because most people don't understand what is happening,
(B) Because many who do recognize the unfolding tragedy have been
threatened and are afraid to speak out, and,
(C) Because both public health officers and physicians have been
effectively blocked from introducing the public health measures needed to
stop further spread of this modern-day plague. (12)
(A) Randy Shilts, author of "And The Band Played On"
recognized this fact when he wrote: "The bitter truth was that
AIDS did not just happen to America - It was allowed to happen by an array
of institutions, all of which failed to perform their appropriate tasks to
safeguard the public health ... There was no excuse, in this country and
in this time, for the spread of a deadly new epidemic." (13)
Why is this happening? Tragically, most Americans do not understand the
magnitude of the epidemic because our print and TV media have been
selective in reporting matters dealing with the epidemic. I know that from
first-hand experience because I and many of my cohorts have been thwarted
in our efforts to disseminate the truth about the magnitude of the
epidemic. I have recorded that story in my book "AIDS: The
Unnecessary Epidemic", published in 1991 by Covenant House. An
interesting study in thought control in America today is to try to acquire
my book via regular distribution channels.
In recent years several other books have been published which have, in my
opinion, presented misleading information about the epidemic. Tragically,
that misinformation has discouraged introduction of the public health
measures needed to save human lives. In 1990 Regnery Gateway published
Michael Fumento's "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS". In that book,
Fumento assured his readers that there was no possibility of heterosexual
spread of AIDS here in the United States. Noting that the epidemic had not
exploded within the white, heterosexual community as feared, Fumento
crafted a convincing tale belittling those of us who wanted to introduce
public health measures to block further spread of the disease. In his
book, Fumento accused me of "iceberg-theory terrorism" because
during the early stages of the epidemic I expressed fear that HIV disease
would spread into the general heterosexual population. (14) As time has
gone by I have publicly modified my view, but to the best of my knowledge
Michael Fumento has never recanted his message that no public health
measures were needed. During the early stages of the epidemic, we were
both wrong. I erred on the side of caution; Michael Fumento erred on the
side that insists that preventive health measures were not needed to stop
the epidemic.
The tragedy unfolding in both Asia and Africa today reflects the apathy
engendered by the misinformation disseminated during the early 1990s. I
sincerely believe that the lives of hundreds of thousands of homosexuals,
IV drug users, black heterosexuals and black children could have been
saved had public health measures been introduced at that time. Had
measures been introduced in Asia and Africa, hundreds of millions of lives
could have been saved. That, however, was not to be. (15). In 1994 Inside
Story Publications released "Why We Will Never Win the War on
AIDS" written by Brian Ellison and Dr. Peter Duesberg. Dr. Duesberg
insists that there is no AIDS epidemic, and that most of those who are
assumed to have died from AIDS have actually succumbed to the
complications of drug usage, sexual stimulants, and AZT. (16) An updated
version of Dr. Duesberg's book was republished by Regnery Publishing Inc.
in 1996 under the title "Inventing the AIDS Virus". Both books
contended that:
[1] "in most individuals suffering from AIDS, no virus particles
can be found anywhere in the body" (17)
[2] "retroviruses do not kill cells" (18)
[3] There are no scientific studies to document any relationship between
HIV infection and immunodeficiency (19)
[4] Kimberly Bergalis was perfectly healthy before she was given AZT (20)
[5] HIV-infected hemophiliacs and transfusion recipients do not die from
immunodeficiency but rather from their hemophilia and other diseases. (21)
A number of other questionable arguments were presented in a clever and
convincing manner in Dr. Duesberg's book, and they swayed many people.
After all, why would Dr. Duesberg, a world-famous retrovirologist, make
such statements if they weren't true? Let me respond:
[1] Clinicians presently chart the course of HIV disease by measuring the
numbers of viral particles present in peripheral blood.
[2] Because the HIV retrovirus routinely kills normal T cells in the
laboratory, special resistant lines of T cells must be used to culture the
retrovirus: This information was confirmed by telephone conversation with
Dr. Donald Francis in August 1996, and with the chief of the CDC virology
lab in Atlanta, Georgia, in February 1996.
[3] There have been a number of published studies documenting the
relationship between HIV infection and terminal-stage immuno- suppression:
(22,23)
[4] Kimberly Bergalis was severely immuno- compromised, contracted
pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and had a CD4 count as low as 41 before she
was started on AZT. This information was obtained from Kimberly's college
medical records which were graciously provided to me by her father,
George.
[5] Both Ellison and Dr. Duesberg ignore the fact that hemophiliacs and
transfusion recipients who have died have virtually all manifested the
classic, clinical picture of terminal- stage immunodeficiency. (24)
A detailed analysis of Dr.Duesberg's arguments and his agenda is beyond
the scope of this article. That subject is covered in my HIV-Watch
newsletter, and in my monograph, "The Population Control
Agenda". Unfortunately, Dr. Duesberg's books have convinced many
otherwise sincere people that there is no reason to institute standard
public health measures to control further spread of the epidemic. (25)
(B) Why have people been afraid to speak out? I personally know of
physicians, medical personnel and politicians who have had their
professions ruined simply because they dared to comment publicly on the
mishandling of the epidemic. On one occasion two public health officers
approached me stating: "We want you to know that we support you and
what you're doing, but we can't come out publicly because we've been
threatened." That pattern of intimidation has been commonplace since
the inception of the epidemic. The story of the threats and intimidation
utilized to silence concerned professionals is also covered in "AIDS:The
Unnecessary Epidemic". (26)
(C) For centuries epidemics have been stopped by identifying the infected,
and preventing them from transmitting their illness to others. In the case
of HIV disease it would have been relatively simple to have blocked
further spread of the epidemic in the mid-1980s when the HIV blood test
became available. That, however, was not to be. Even before the blood test
was released in May of 1985 there were forces organizing to block the
introduction of standard public health measures to control further spread
of the epidemic. Virtually all necessary public health measures have been
precluded because of those efforts. (27,28)
The precedent for public health management of a sexually transmitted
disease epidemic was established by Surgeon General Thomas Parren during
the syphylis epidemic of the 1930s. Had physicians been allowed to
introduce the public health measures needed in the mid-1980s we could have
stopped further spread of the plague. What should have been done?
[1] Physicians should have been instructed to carry out routine,
non-mandatory, confidential HIV testing on all office and hospital
patients.
[2] Mandatory reportability of the names of the infected to public health
officials should have been instituted to facilitate contact tracing,
compilation of accurate statistics, and identification of those who were
intentionally spreading their illness.
[3] Mandatory premarital, prenatal, and neonatal HIV testing should have
been introduced to save the lives of sexual partners, unborn and newborn
children.
[4] Infected prostitutes should have been identified and removed from our
streets.
[5] Houses of prostitution, gay sex clubs and bathhouses should have been
closed.
[6] Nationwide treatment programs for drug addicts should have been
introduced.
[7] Education should have stressed chastity and morality rather than
instructing our youth how to put on condoms and lecturing them on aberrant
sexual activity.
Tragically, almost all efforts by concerned public health officers and
physicians to address the HIV epidemic have been thwarted. I know from
personal experience because for over a decade I led the battle within the
House of Delegates of the California Medical Association to introduce the
public health measures needed to stop the epidemic. Year after year the
physicians voted to introduce effective public health measures, and year
after year those within the hierarchy and the bureaucracy of organized
medicine worked to block implementation of those policies. That tragic
story is also chronicled in my book "AIDS: The Unnecessary
Epidemic".
Men and women of conscience are not relieved of their moral responsibility
to speak out concerning the manner in which this epidemic has been handled
simply because it has failed to involve the white heterosexual population
of America. In my opinion, almost everyone who acquires this disease today
does so because of our nation's failure to implement the public health
measures necessary to block further spread of the illness. I sincerely
believe that men do become accomplices to those tragedies which they fail
to oppose. Failure to speak out in times of moral crises makes cowards of
men, and these days we live in are surely times of great moral crisis.
(1) Radio Interview. John Harris. 9/13/95. Radio Liberty, P.O. Box 13,
Santa Cruz, CA 95063. Copies available.
(2) Radio Interview. Peter Hammond of Front Lines Ministry: 9/20/96. Radio
Liberty. Copies available.
(3) Sullivan Brian R. Special Operations and LIC in the 21st Century: The
Joint Strategic Perspective: Special Warfare. The John F. Kennedy Special
Warfare Center and School May 1996; 9(2):4. Contact Superintendent of
Documents, US Publishing Office, Washington D.C. 20402
(4) Life Expectancy Shortened in Uganda. Xinhua News Agency 8/18/96. (See
also CDC AIDS Daily Summary 8/19/96).
(5) Burns JF. Denial and Taboo Blind India to the Horror of the AIDS
Scourge. New York Times 9/22/96: 1. (See also CDC Daily Summary 9/23/96:
2.)
(6) Blattner W. More than 100 Million Worldwide Predicted to be
HIV-Positive by Year 2000. Reuters News Service 6/17/96. (See also CDC
AIDS Daily Summary 6/19/96: 2.)
(7) Soto KE et al. HIV-1 Langerhans' Cell Tropism Associated with
Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. Science 3/1/96; 271: 1291
(8) Kolata Gina. New AIDS Study Reveals Startling Immunity Data. New York
Times 9/27/96: A13:
(9) Dean Michael. Genetic Restrictions of HIV-1 Infection and Progression
of AIDS. Science 9/27/96; 273: 1856.
(10) The Changing Face of AIDS. New York Times 11/04/96: A26
(11) Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Health: Division of STD/AIDS
Surveillance Quarterly; 4(2,3):1. Available from P.O. Box 2448,Room 112,
Richmond, VA 23218
(12) Monteith SK. AIDS:The Unnecessary Epidemic. Covenant House 1991. (See
also HIV-Watch; I-V.) P.O. Box 1835, Soquel, CA 95073.
(13) Shilts Randy. And the Band Played On. St. Martin's Press 1987: xxii.
(14) Fumento Michael. The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS. Regnery Gateway 1990:
303.
(15) Ibid: 178-184
(16) Ellison Brian., Duesberg Peter H. Why We Will Never Win the War on
AIDS. Inside Story Communications. El Cerrito CA 1994 : v-viii.
(17) Duesberg Peter H. Inventing the AIDS Virus. Regnery Publishing Inc
1996: 175
(18) Ibid: 158
(19) Why We Will Never Win The War On AIDS. op cited: 250
(20) Inventing the AIDS Virus: op cited: 348-252
(21) Ibid: 4, 183-185, 286-288
(22) Asher MS. et al. Does Drug Use Cause AIDS. Nature 3/11/93; 362:103
(23) Schecter Martin T. et al. HIV-1 and the Aetiology of AIDS. Lancet
3/13/93; 341: 658-659
(24) Minimal Data Set for Risk Reduction,National Totals 1/1/93 -
12/31/93. 125 Hemophilia Treatment Centers Reporting to the CDC.
(25) Why We Will Never Win the War On AIDS; op cited: 122
(26) AIDS:The Unnecessary Epidemic; op cited.
(27) And the Band Played On; op cited: 539-560.
(28) AIDS:The Unnecessary Epidemic: op cited: 136, 161-66, 193, 342-43.
|