PART 1:
As I begin writing this
report, the news is telling about a strange USAIR airplane crash in
Pennsylvania. Next day a plane crashed in Moscow. CNN told about a
fireball that was reported from Bakersfield, California, to Medford,
Oregon. They said it occurred about 6 or 6:15 in the morning on
Saturday, September 10 (1994) and was so bright that the light shining
through windows woke up some people. They showed a house in San Rafael
with a hole in the roof from a piece of something falling from the sky.
An Arian rocket was
launched from French Guyana and was lost, a day before. Several
earthquakes have occurred in California, including one that CNN showed
on a map, southwest of Lake Tahoe. About 15 minutes later, CNN began
telling about the Space Shuttle firing lasers at Earth and showed a view
of Earth, with Lake Tahoe in the upper right corner of the screen. If
you put the two together, then you see that the Columbia Space Shuttle
is firing laser beams at Earth "for environmental purposes,"
precisely where the earthquakes are occurring. The President went to
Camp David, then when the President returned (?), a plane crashed into
the White House. Later he gave a speech in a room of the White House,
then just after he left a fire broke out in the room. Rosh Hashanah is
recently passed (September 6-7, 1994), and Yom Kippur is coming up
(September 15, 1994). The President has ordered 8,300 Navy, 1,800 Marine
and 4,000 Army personnel along with 15 or 20 warships to [prepare to]
invade Haiti.
SECRET WARS BETWEEN
POWERS THAT BE
If what you are about to
read does not scare the pants off you, then you must not be wearing any.
Pay attention and this information may save your life. The purpose of
this article is to inform you briefly about some of the secret wars that
are going on between the Powers-That-Be that are struggling for control
of the world.
In 1978, I was head of a
Mensa special interest group called the Doomsday Club News and
Intelligence Report. I wrote a newsletter for the Club. In the May,
1978, issue I said:
"WAR is an
ever-present danger, much closer than most people realize. Now Russia is
testing 'killer satellites' and laser and particle beam weapons, while
the U.S. is undertaking a major program to develop counterbeam weapons -
a real Star Wars battle is taking shape. War in space is now possible
and the likelihood of it grows. A program is now under way to determine
the feasibility of using the Space Shuttle for defense purposes."
What I did not know at that time, was the fact that the space war had
already started. This manuscript will provide more details.
In the same newsletter, I
mentioned that Richard Helms of the CIA had been fired by President
Carter, and recommended that the reader contact the Security &
Intelligence Fund (at address included) for more information. I listed
the staff members a s James Angleton, Elbridge Durbrow, Brig Gen. Robert
Richardson, Former Secy. of Navy and Treasury Robert Anderson, former
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral G. W. Anderson, and other names that
become important later in this story.
SHIFTING DEFENSE
STRATEGIES
On page 10, I said:
"The U.S. is shifting its defense to sub-launched ballistics
missiles and air-launched cruise missiles, as silo-based ICBMs become
vulnerable to a pre-emptive first strike by the Soviet Union." The
B-52, F-14, F-15, and F-16 will be equipped with cruise missiles over
the next five years, in the Pacific Region. This posture indicates
admission that nothing standing still in the U.S. can be protected -
only aircraft and submarines have a chance of surviving a first strike.
"Independent
congressional studies already have been completed that show that by 1980
the Russians could conduct a first strike against the Minuteman force
with a strong probability of being able to destroy the majority of U.S.
ICBMs, and that by as early as 1981 the U.S. will no longer have a
sufficient deterrent to preclude a Soviet first strike." I
continued with a quote from Aviation Week & Space Technology, (p.
14, Apr. 3, 1978), about the numbers of missiles that we and Russia had.
Later on the page I mentioned about Defense Secretary Harold Brown
proposing a sharp increase in civil defense spending, including funding
a study to plan faster evacuation of cities during threat of a nuclear
attack. What was going on? Why was the U.S. shifting its defense
strategy, and suddenly emphasizing the importance of civil defense?
In my July issue of the
DCN&IR newsletter, I quoted General George S. Brown, Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, who said: "What the Soviets are doing is
unsettling, principally because none of us know why." I said:
"General Alexander Haig, Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, warned
Washington in March of the fundamental change in the Warsaw Pact Air Arm
to "an offensive character." I continued by saying that I felt
that Russia was preparing to defend itself from the threat of a rearmed
Germany. I mentioned that most of the U.S. nuclear force was on German
soil. On page 7 I said that "Japan, for the first time since World
War II, has ordered its armed forces to prepare defense plans to protect
itself from foreign attack."
On page 10, I quoted
Alexander Solzhenitsyn as saying, "No weapons, no matter how
powerful, can help the West until it overcomes its loss of willpower. To
defend oneself, one must be ready to die."
PARTICLE BEAM
TECHNOLOGY RIDICULED
The cover headline article
of my October 1978 issue was NUCLEAR WEAPONS - SOON OBSOLETE! The
following is what that article said:
General George Keegan -
grad of Harvard, flew 56 combat missions in WWII, earned Distinguished
Service Cross in Vietnam, Executive VP of U.S. Strategic Institute,
Chief of U.S. Air Force Intelligence. About two years ago he retired
from the Air Force, because he saw some critical dangers to the U.S.
that he was not allowed to reveal to the public. He tried to warn the
Powers in the White House but they laughed at him. So about 19 months
ago he made the first public references to secret Russian research on
*charged-particle beam weapons.* Aviation Week & Space Technology
magazine followed up on his information and determined that he was
essentially correct. However, President Carter and Defense Secretary
Harold Brown, both badly briefed by the CIA, ridiculed Keegan.
U.S. scientists at
Lawrence Livermore Lab (bicycle riding distance from me) undertook
Project See-Saw to determine if the U.S. could build particle beam
weapons. The decision was that it was presently impossible to build such
a weapon and since we are so far ahead of the Soviets technologically,
it was ridiculous to think they were building one. Keegan revealed his
findings on Soviet particle beam developments to CIA head William Colby
in 1975. Colby convened the Nuclear Intelligence Panel which determined
that, since the US could not build such a weapon, it was impossible that
the Soviets were doing it. Colby never passed the information from the
Air Force intelligence on to the President or Secretary of Defense.
Keegan retired and started
making the information public, through the American Security Council (of
which I am a member of the National Advisory Board) and other groups.
His story was greeted with high-level official sneering, the most
acrimonious sneers coming from the self-styled "nuclear
engineer" President Jimmy Carter and Defense Secretary Harold Brown
(formerly from Lawrence Livermore Lab). "But despite the official
denials, the Soviets continued their work, carrying at least eight
electron-beam experiments into space on board Cosmos, Soyuz and Salyut
spacecraft..." (AW & ST) and conducting tests at Semipalatinsk
and Sarova. "At the same time, younger U.S. physicists, uninhibited
by the ego problems of their elders, also were making progress on the
key techniques required for beam weapons development. Now the tide
has turned. A full-scale U.S. effort to tackle the technology required
to determine the feasibility of beam weapons development is being
organized at the highest level in the Pentagon. Even the most stubborn
skeptics now acknowledge that leaving this field uncontested to the
Soviets is a risk the U.S. cannot afford to take. Because of the extreme
public embarrassment this series [of articles] will bring to...
President Jimmy Carter, and Defense Secretary Harold Brown, who saw his
contemporaries try and fail in Project See-Saw, there is still an
attempt to shroud the program in official secrecy" (Aviation Week
& Space Technology, Oct. 2, 1978).
The article states,
"Experts on Capitol Hill, who have surveyed all the evidence
including secret data not available to us, have concluded that Gen.
Keegan's assessment was essentially correct..." Edward Teller has
informed key senators that Gen. Keegan's analysis was right on the core
of the matter."
The Soviets have already
successfully tested particle beam weapons (as has France!). "U.S.
particle beam weapons experts who have access to U.S. intelligence
information and personal contacts with Russian physicists involved in
magnetic and plasma physics programs believe the Soviets will field a
ground-based proton beam weapon between 1980-1983."
SIPAPU PROJECT
The Pentagon has initiated
a program called "Chair Heritage" to field our own system by
about 1982. It formerly was mostly a Navy program at the Naval
Post-graduate facility in Monterey, CA, but is now being combined with
the Army SIPAPU project (space beams, as opposed to beams carried on
Navy vessels) and others - it seems that now everybody who is anybody is
getting involved (Lawrence Livermore Lab, Sandia Corp., Defense Nuclear
Agency, CIA, Hughes Aircraft, Lockheed, University of Texas, Austin
Research Associates, etc.).
If you remember, Russia
beat us into space with Sputnik, then we went into a crash program to
get ahead of them. Vannevar Bush once said that it was impossible to
build a ballistics missile capable of going 3000 miles, but within 10
years Russia had them and we were just beginning a crash program to
catch up.
Now we are once again in a
race for strategic superiority, but this time Russia may field their
system in 2 years while it appears that we require at least 5 years -
but then things can change quickly.
A problem we now have is
the top leadership - the President and Secretary of Defense - may hold
back progress because they do not like to admit their mistake. In the
past, there were several intelligence services, all in competition with
each other trying to be the most accurate and when one service goofed,
the other pointed it out. Now, Carter has unified the intelligence
services under Stansfield Turner and all intelligence reports must be
through Turner before they get to the Defense Secretary or President
from men such as Gen. Keegan, Gen. Singlaub, etc. It also creates the
chance that the President can be considerably misinformed or uninformed.
This, in the long run, could be an even greater danger to the U.S. than
the particle beam weapon!
PARTICLE BEAM
CAPABILITIES
So what is a particle beam
weapon? It is similar to a laser, but it is not a laser. Lasers shoot a
beam of electromagnetic radiation (light), while particle beam weapons
shoot a beam of sub-atomic particles (electrons, protons, ions, etc.).
What this means is that NUCLEAR WEAPONS MAY SOON BECOME OBSOLETE.
Whoever puts satellites
with particle beam weapons into orbit first (property controlled by
complex sensors and computers) can control the world. ANY GUIDED MISSILE
OR AIRCRAFT CAN THEN BE ZAPPED OUT OF EXISTENCE IN A FRACTION OF A
SECOND AFTER LAUNCH.
Under those conditions, we
will still have nuclear bombs, but it would be impossible to deliver
them against an enemy who is protected by particle beams.
An editorial in AW &
ST said, "For beam weapons offer the promise of reducing strategic
nuclear weapons to a negligible factor in the future. If successfully
deployed, beam weapons can end the long reign of nuclear terror
introduced by the ballistic missile and its thermonuclear warhead. If
the Soviets achieve this capability first, it will give them enormous
crucial leverage in imposing their political will on the rest of the
world. If the U.S. achieves it first, there will be no need for flimsy
SALT agreements, and in a dead heat, the citizens of this planet can
look forward to a shifting of international tensions from the strategic
nuclear area to more conventional and less devastating weapons."
If you want to know what
particle beam weapons are like, just watch "Star Wars" or
Battlestar Galactica."
This is the end of the
quote from my 1978 newsletter. And now, as Paul Harvey would say, for
the rest of the story!
Russia launched the
Intercosmos 17 octagon space vehicle on September 26, 1977. The
*Encyclopedia Brittanica* says its purpose was for "international
scientific research in charged particles and micrometeorites."
What, a charged particle satellite? Already in space? What did we just
read above? "If the Soviets achieve this capability FIRST, it will
give them enormous crucial leverage in imposing their political will on
the rest of the world."
WAR IN SPACE
The Battle of the Harvest
Moon began on September 17, 1977. Russia began destroying our spy
satellites using "killer satellites." On September 27, Russia
destroyed our SECRET MOON BASE. On September 29, 1977, Russia launched
the Salyut 6 manned space station into orbit.
First, let's explore a
little background. The book *War In Space* by James Canan, 1982, Harper
& Row, p. 153 says: "High-energy weapons, their perils and
their promise, began penetrating the congressional consciousness in the
late seventies, and it was Major General George J. Keegan USAF - 'crazy
George' to his critic, 'brilliant George' to his admirers - who started
it all. Keegan undoubtedly harbored one of the very highest IQs ever to
grace the military establishment, which is, stereotypes to the contrary,
saying quite a lot.
Keegan was in Air Force
intelligence for many years, and in charge of it, starting in 1972, for
five... By the mid-seventies, Keegan's Air Force intelligence empire, as
his critics dubbed it, had a population of about 50,000 and was spending
nearly $3 billion a year. Keegan had access to HUMINT sources inside
Russia and elsewhere, to all the albums of the photorecce satellites and
all the tapes of the ELINT satellites."
P. 155: "In 1972, a
young civilian scientist in the employ of Air Force intelligence had
come to Keegan with 'evidence of a Soviet effort to develop one of the
greatest strategic weapons of all time - a beam weapon of great, high
energy that would be used to destroy ballistic missiles in flight for
the ultimate defense of the Soviet Union.'
Having spent three years
studying nuclear physics at the graduate level, Keegan took it upon
himself to team up with that young scientist in the examination of
evidence gleaned from unclassified Soviet scientific papers. He
concluded that the young man was onto something, and he put his troops
to work. With Keegan in direct control, an Air Force intelligence team
sifted and collated reports from inside Russia and from satellite
photographs and communications intercepts concerning a sprawling complex
of buildings, pipes, and what-not at Semipalatinsk in south-central
Soviet Asia.
What the Soviets had built
there - starting with their underground positioning of two huge spheres
in the early 1970s - was a facility for the testing of charged-particle
beams... a sizable segment of the U.S. scientific community jumped all
over Keegan, accusing him of trafficking in paranoia."
P. 157: "In 1974, two
years after General Keegan began sounding off in top-secret circles
about the Russian work at Semipalatinsk, particle beams came back into
vogue at the Pentagon. A Defense Department document described what
happened: the Navy initiated its "Chair Heritage' program involving
electron beam development [for] 'application to defense of ships against
all forms of attack by aircraft and missiles... The Army also began a
separate program to demonstrate the production of high-current ion
beams.'
The first Army program,
called 'SIPAPU' (an American Indian word for sacred fire) is controlled
by the Ballistic Missile Defense Command at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama,
and centered at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. Chair Heritage,
transferred to DARPA control in 1980, is being conducted by the Lawrence
Radiation Laboratory at Livermore..." I trust that some of my
readers will take note of that word "Sipapu."
SECRET PROJECTS
Until mid-1979, I worked
for Control Data Corporation in Sunnyvale, California, in the
"skunk works" division. One of the projects on which I worked
was Chair Heritage.
For confirmation for
researchers, I will provide the following information: My boss was Phil
Myers. Program Managers were JM Moore (TIGS, IOS projects), Jack
Crawford, JL Smith, CR Shuler, LH Woodward, WA Osborne, and others.
Some of the projects were
code named STC, RFREDA, BRONCO, MARE ISLAND, A4, LATFAC, DALFAC, RKYDSO,
etc. It would do you no good to know what these names stood for - TIGS
stood for Terminal Integrated Graphics, IOS was Integrated Operating
Systems, DALFAC was Dallas Facility, etc.
Just suffice to say that
we had the world's most powerful computers (Star 100 which was a Cray
computer, etc.) and we were involved in the U.S.'s most secret projects.
Our customers included the weather facility at Monterey, CA, (weather
satellites do more than observe the weather), Cheyenne Mountain in
Colorado, DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), NASA, and,
oh yes, THE IRS. One of my friends spent all his free time away from the
job studying anti-gravity, so it was not too hard to guess what his job
concerned.
General Keegan and
Carter's Secretary of Defense Harold Brown did not see eye to eye -
could the fact that Brown's father was a Russian Jew (I forget his real
name) have had anything to do with it? As a military officer, Keegan was
forbidden to say anything to the public, so in January 1977 Keegan
resigned and set up the civilian American Security Council and began
traveling over the country giving speeches to try to awaken everybody.
He failed.
Keegan died in March,
1993. His obituary in the *New York Times* said, "He asserted that
the Soviet Union was building a civil-defense system that would ensure a
reasonable rate of survival from nuclear exchange. He also believed that
the Russians were close to deploying futuristic charged particle-beam
weapons." The book *Deep Black: Space Espionage and National
Security* by William E. Burrows, Random House, a history of spy
satellites, has more information on Keegan.
SKYLAB MISSIONS
Have you ever REALLY
wondered why the U.S. never went to the moon again? Do you remember
*Skylab?* The official story is *Skylab* was launched May 14, 1973. It
was to be America's manned space station. On 5/25/73 a Saturn rocket
carried the first crew (Conrad, Kerwin & Weitz) to *Skylab,* a
mission that lasted nearly a month.
The second crew (Alan
Bean, Owen Garriott, and Jack Lousma) was launched 7/28/73, a mission
that lasted nearly two months. Both missions were plagued by failures,
leaks and other problems.
The third manned *Skylab*
mission began November 14 with Gerald Carr, William Pogue and Edward
Gibson. It was said that the mission was delayed six days because of
cracks in the Saturn rocket's tail fins.
Russia had launched a
space station on April 3, but on April 14 it blew up, what was described
as a "catastrophic malfunction."
"BAD LUCK" AT
NASA
After the amazing
successes of the Apollo missions, for some reason NASA started having
all kinds of bad luck. "In the U.S. the success of the first flight
of the Space Shuttle orbiter was clouded by two catastrophic failures of
previously reliable rocket launch vehicles.
After preliminary taxi
test on the runway and flights mated to its Boeing 747 jet carrier
plane, the Shuttle orbiter Enterprise was pronounced ready for release
from its mother plane. On August 12, at Edwards Air Force Base in
California, astronauts Fred W. Haise, Jr., and C. Gordon Fullerton
guided the Enterprise to a 'superslick' landing on the floor of Rogers
Dry Lake 5 minutes and 23 seconds after being released from the 747.
A second flight, with
astronauts Joe H. Engle and Richard H. Truly, on September 13 was
equally successful. Haise and Fullerton put the Enterprise through yet
another landing ten days later. An ill omen appeared at the Kennedy
Space Center in Florida in mid-May, when a small, strap-on
solid-propellant booster rocket fell from its bracket on the first stage
of a Delta vehicle and damaged it. The booster was being prepared to
launch the Orbital Test Satellite for ESA.
The satellite was
destroyed on September 13 when its Delta launch vehicle exploded one
minute after lift-off, apparently because one of its solid-propellant
strap-on rockets detonated. Only 16 days later, a Centaur booster with
an Intellsat 4A communications satellite on board also went up in flames
only one minute after launch" (*Encyclopedia Brittanica Book of the
Year,* 1978, p. 638.
Friends, it's time you
learned the real story. In October, 1977, a newly operational Russian
Cosmos Interceptor shot down *Skylab. Skylab,* along with its crew of
five American astronauts secretly aboard, died in a giant fireball over
the United States. NASA immediately initiated a prolonged cover-up of
what had happened. How do I know? Suffice it to say, I have a very
high-up source of information.
Dale G. Stonehouse (stoney@cloudnet.com)
DISCLAIMER: "I know
one thing for certain; that I know no thing (nothing) for certain."
- Me.
"It's what you learn
after you know it all that counts." - Earl Weaver.
| Part
02 |
Part 03
| Part 04
| Part 05
| Part 06
| Part 07
| Part 08
| Part 09
| Part 10
| Part 11
|
| Part
12 | Part
13 | Part
14 | Part
15 | Part
16 | Part
17 | Part
18 | Part
19 | Part
20 | Part
21 |
| Part
22 | Part
23 | Part
24 | Part
25 | Part
26 | Part
27 | Part
28 | Part
29 | Part
30 |
