Mountain A Hoax or Betrayal?
By: Paula Demers
In 1961, the Kennedy administration ordered a "Top Secret" study
to determine what problems the United States would face if the world moved
from an era of war to a golden age of peace. In other words, how to bring
America into the New World Order. By 1963 the selection of the specialist
had been made. This study group consisted of 15 experts in various
academic disciplines who were selected for their expertise in their
various fields. The first and last meetings were in an underground nuclear
survival retreat called Iron Mountain.
In the same year that this "Top Secret" study was called, 1961,
The Department of State put out a publication (#7277) called "Freedom
From War, The United States Program for a General and Complete Disarmament
in a Peaceful World". This publication describes a three step program
to disarm the American military, shut down bases and have one military
under the United Nations. This "military" would be the world
wide police force to be used as "peace keepers" throughout the
world. The plan would include that "all weapons of mass
destruction" be eliminated with the exception of "those required
for a United Nations Peace Force" (page 12 paragraph one). In order
to "keep the peace, all states will reaffirm their obligations under
the UN Charter to refrain from the threat of use of any type armed
force" (page 16, Paragraph eight) To support the UN Charter, the
average citizen will need to be disarmed; so they cannot defend themselves
against these "peace keepers". You don't have to watch much news
to see that today, the UN forces are used as "peace keepers"
throughout the world, disarming people so they can't defend themselves
against oppressive governments. To quote Sarah Brady, Chair of
Handguncontrol, Inc. "Our Task of creating a socialist America can
only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally
I also want to point out the interesting things that happened in the mid
1960's: The protests against the war in Vietnam. The protests against
Nuclear Arms. The protests for arms reduction......Much of these protests
were done by college students. Many who graduated and became the doctors,
lawyers, people in politics, and even the President for today.
In 1963, the same year as the selection of specialists for this "Top
Secret" study, President John F. Kennedy made an astounding
statement. On November 13, while speaking at Columbus University, Pres.
Kennedy stated, "The high office of the President of the United
States of America has been used to foment a plot to destroy America's
freedom, and before I leave office, I must inform the citizens of their
plight! Ten days later, President John F. Kennedy was shot and killed.
The study was completed in 1966. President Johnson gave the order that the
report was never to be released, due to the nature of the conclusions
reached. The purpose of this Report was to see what it would take to bring
the United States into a New World Order. The "experts" decided
that the American people were not intelligent enough to understand what
"big brother" had decided for them; and what "big
brother" would need to do to accomplish what was decided for them. If
the truth came out too soon, the American people would be able to stop it.
To quote directly from the cover letter of this report: (paragraph three)
"Because of the unusual circumstances surrounding the establishment
of this Group, and in view of the nature of its finding, we do not
recommend that this Report be released for publication...such actions
would not be in the PUBLIC INTEREST (emphasis mine)..a lay reader,
unexposed to the exigencies of higher political or military
responsibility, will misconstrue the purpose of this project, and the
intent... We urge that the circulation of the Report be closely restricted
to those who's responsibilities require that they be apprised of its
contents..." Those who responsibilities require they know? Would this
be the people who will be working to bring us into a New
One man involved in the study elected to release it to the general public.
He did it at great risk to himself using the name John Doe. Mr. Do must
have believed the American people were smart enough to decide for
themselves if they wanted to loose their freedom to a "golden age of
peace". After John Doe released the information, the Establishment
renounced it saying it was a hoax. There are not many copies of this
Report left. Some large libraries have copies and it would be worth the
effort to check it out. This in itself would be proof it is not a hoax.
There are very interesting terms used and repeated throughout the report.
Some of these include "general condition of peace",
"functions of war", "change social structure",
"problems of peace", "transition of world peace",
replacing the "function of war", "saving the species"
(man), "disarmament transition", "social control",
"selective population control",
"gross population control" and "loss of national
The stated purpose of this Report (taken from the first paragraph of the
cover letter) is:
to consider the problems involved in the contingency of a transition to a
general condition of peace, and
To recommend procedures for dealing with this contingency. " We will
do our best to capture the basic message in this report.
This 34 page report basically deals with the "functions of War"
and how to replace those "functions" with other options. So
there can be peace and the "species" (man) can survive.
THE IRON MOUNTAIN REPORT
The introduction of this Report shows some interesting observations this
group came up with during their 2 1/2 year study. If there came a
"condition of world peace" (paragraph three) it would change the
social structures of all the nations of the world. There is nothing that
has happened to compare with the change that would occur in such an
instance. They point out that there would be consequences to peace. Not
just the economy, but every other aspect of life would be touched also. It
would touch the "political, sociological, cultural, and
ecological" aspects. The reason they included these aspects in their
study is that the world (at that time) was totally unprepared to cover all
the demands that would come in these areas in such a situation of peace.
They conclude that at the end of the report they give their
recommendations for what they believe to be a "practical and
necessary course of action." (paragraph six)
These 15 experts set you straight in the first section that they are doing
to be totally objective in their study. (Section one, paragraph five) They
made a "continuously self-conscious effort" to keep the values
of "good" and "bad". They admit that it wasn't easy,
but as far as they could tell, it had never been done before. The previous
studies for peace had taken certain things into consideration:"...the
importance of human life, the superiority of democratic institutions, the
greatest 'good' for the greatest number, the 'dignity' of the individual,
the desirability of maximum healthier and longevity,...." These
experts did not. Instead they attempted to "....apply the standards
of physical science...." and go on to quote Whitehead who said,
"...ignores all judgments of value; for instance, all esthetics and
In other words, people the idea of human rights, and the value of human
life are not at all taken into consideration in the putting together of
the Report. They took their assignment, and decided how they could take
care of all the problems without considering the people involved. In this
report, as you will see, human beings are being brought down to the level
of herds of animals.
Section four is interesting. (War and Peace as Social Systems). They point
out that wars are not "caused" because of international
conflicts of interest. (paragraph seven). They further comment that
"...war-making, active or contemplated, is a matter of life and death
on the greatest scale subject to social control..." In paragraph six
of this same section, they comment that the "threats" against
the "national interest" are created or accelerated to "meet
the changing needs of the war system". This will be in more detail in
the next section, where they discuss the "Functions of War".
(Section five) for each section, along with their "Substitutes for
the Functions of War (Section six). We will include booth the
"functions" and the "substitutes" under each heading.
FUNCTION OF WAR / SUBSTITUTES FOR THE FUNCTIONS OF WAR
They go into great detail on the "Functions of War" (Section
five) and the "Substitutes for the Functions of War" (Section
six). The areas covered are: economic, political, sociological,
ecological, cultural and scientific. These areas are all affected by the
"functions of war" so they will have to find "substitutes
for the functions of war" in order to have peace. see: Silent Weapons For a Quiet War
One "function of war" is that it uses organized violence to
defend or advance "national interest". They believe it is
necessary for a military establishment to "create a need for it's
unique powers" (Section five, paragraph two)
Another major "function of war" is that it produces waste. This
waste is a means to control surpluses. It also produces jobs and
industrial advancement. War, basically, stimulates the economy. Paragraph
eight states, "It is, and has been the essential economic stabilizer
of modern societies."
In section six, they come up with options that can replace war. They have
two criteria: they must be wasteful, and must operate outside the normal
supply and demand system. They make a list of social welfare programs,
such as heath and housing. But they comment that there is a weakness in
changing the money form the military spending to social-welfare. Unless it
was run like the military , "subject to arbitrary control".
(paragraph 12) This control would com in the form of building (public
housing--medical centers) that can be accelerated or stopped, depending on
what it would take to create a stable economy. Another option would be a
series of "giant space research programs". (paragraph 13)
One "function of war" in the political sense, is that war is
"virtually synonymous with nationhood" (paragraph two) War has
been essential for nations to exist independently. So, with
"peace", nations lose their national sovereignty.
So a "substitute for the function of war" politically would have
to come up with something that would be compatible with no national
sovereignty. Nations can still exist in the "administrative
sense" (paragraph two). But there would have to be institutions, such
as a "World Court or a United Nations" that had the real
One of the things considered was generating a type of space enemy. They
acknowledge that, "...most ambitious and unrealistic space project
cannot of itself generate a believable eternal menace...."(paragraph
seven) Even the "flying saucer instances" were not encouraging
enough to be used to unite "....mankind against the danger of
destruction by 'creatures' from other planets...."
An effective substitute for war, would require "alternate
enemies". (paragraph seven) They go on to say that a "gross
pollution of the environment" could eventually replace the mass
destruction by nuclear weapons, as a "threat to the survival of the
species", (meaning humans). In paragraph eight, they go on to say
that "...Poisoning of the air, and the principles sources of food and
water supply, is already well advanced,". This, at first glance,
would seem to be promising. But they go on to say, "...by present
indications it will be a generation to a generation and a half before
environmental pollution, however severe, will be sufficiently menacing, on
a global scale....." In other words, pollution can offer a solution
to get rid of the population that nuclear war does; and it's already being
done, but it would take a generation to a generation and a half to
accomplish the desired goal. They go on to explain that the rate of
population could be "increased selectively". (paragraph nine) If
there was a "modifying of existing programs" that deter the
pollution, it could speed up the process to make this solution credible
Paragraph ten stresses the fact that even though some of the alternate
enemies mentioned may seem unlikely, they are sure that one must be found.
It must be of "...credible quality and magnitude, if a transition to
peace is ever to come without social disintegration. Plain English? There
must be some type of "disaster" found that will unite the
nations to come under one roof.
The "function of war" in this section is, in the author of this
report's opinion, an insult to human intelligence. In the third paragraph,
they discuss the fact that military service has a "patriotic"
priority in society. This as an idea needs to be "maintained for its
own sake". It can be used as a "...control device over the
hostile, nihilistic, and potential unsettling elements of society in
transition, (meaning, though they don't use the term, people) the draft
can again be defended, and quite convincingly, as a 'military'
necessity." They go on in the fourth paragraph that the
"...armed forces in every civilization have
provided....state-supported haven .....for the 'unemployable'..."
They go on to comment that a replacement for this "function of
war" must "involve a real risk of personal destruction..."
If the substitute doesn't provide a believable life and death threat, it
will not serve the "...socially organizing function of war."
In the "substitution for the function of war" there were two
critical classifications. In order for there to be a stable society in a
world of peace, the following tow criteria would be needed:
an effective substitute for military institutions that neutralize destabilizing
social elements" (which means neutralize anti-social people) This
would be essential for "social control", and
a credible motivational surrogate for war that can insure social
cohesiveness", which would be the basic way to adapt human drives to
what the society needs. (paragraph one)
One possible solution to control "potential enemies of society"
(paragraph six) would be to reintroduce slavery. They asserted that the
"traditional association of slavery" should not blind us to
"..its adaptability to advanced forms of social organization..."
They acknowledge that the "Western moral and economic values" do
not line up with slavery. But it is possible to develop a
"....sophisticated form of slavery..." that may "..be an
absolute prerequisite for social control in a world of peace..." They
maintain that the first "logical" step would be the
"adoption of some form of 'universal' military service."
In paragraph seven, they comment that the "'alternate enemy' must
imply a more immediate, tangible, and indirectly felt threat of
destruction." This enemy must justify taking and paying a "blood
price" in the wide area of human concern. They go on into paragraph
eight to say, "...inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life; the
construction of an up-to-date mythological or religious structure for this
purpose would present difficulties in our era,...certainly be
considered." They go on to discuss the development of "blood
games" (paragraph nine) to effectively control individual aggressive
impulses. To be realistic, a ritual of this type might be
"socialized" like the Spanish Inquisition and the "witch
trials of other periods". The purposes would be for "social
purification", and "State security". Though this type of
thing is doubtful, it is "...considerable less fanciful than the
wishful notion of many peace planners that a lasting condition of peace
can be brought about without the most painstaking examination of every
possible surrogate for the essential functions of war." They
considered this, "in a sense" the quest for "William Jame's
'moral equivalent of war'."
This "function of war" is put in a way very degrading to man. It
starts out in paragraph one with, "Man, like all other animals".
Man is brought down to the level of beasts. They go on to comment that,
"To forestall the inevitable historical cycles of inadequate food
supply, post- Neolithic man destroys surplus members of his own species by
organized warfare." It gets better in paragraph two, where man is
compared "in a limited degree" with rats. This is because they
kill their own kind.
One of the "functions of war" they state, has "...served to
help assure the (survival) of the human species." (paragraph three)
They go on to say that in nature, it is survival of the fittest; the
"inferior" disappear. With war, this function is reversed,
because those who fight and die during wars, are "in general its (its
meaning man) biologically stronger members." In paragraph six, they
state: "Conventional methods of warfare would almost surely prove
inadequate, in this event, to reduce the consuming population to a level
consistent with survival of the species." Species, of course meaning
man. So conventional warfare may not be able to kill enough people. They
go on to say (paragraph seven) that, "The second relevant factor is
the efficiency of modern methods of mass destruction. Even if their use is
not required to meet a world population crisis, they offer, perhaps
paradoxically, the first opportunity in the history of man to halt the
regressive genetic effects of natural selection by war."
They have some interesting ideas for "substitutes for the functions
of war". Since war has shortcomings as a way for "selective
population control", they believe that coming up with substitutes for
this function " should be comparatively simple". (paragraph one)
They believe that even though war has not "been genetically
progressive", it cannot be fairly faulted as a "system of gross
population control to preserve the species".
They believe to have a "universal requirement" for procreation
be limited to "artificial insemination "would be fully adequate
substitute control for population levels". Conception and embryonic
growth would take place under laboratory conditions. This type of
"reproductive system" would have the advantage of "being
susceptible of direct eugenic management". (Sounds like a "Brave
New World" to me.) When this report was written, steps to have
"total control of conception with a variant of the ubiquitous 'pill',
via water supplies or certain essential foodstuffs, off set by a
controlled 'antidote'" was already being developed: by teams of
experimental biologists in Massachusetts, Michigan, and California, Mexico
and the U.S.S.R. (paragraph four)
This solution, they realize, cannot come about a substitute for war while
there is still war. The reason? "...excess population is war
material." (paragraph five) As long as there is even "a remote
possibility of war" societies "must maintain a supportable
population" even if it effects the economy.
CULTURAL AND SCIENTIFIC
The "function of war" wouldn't make too much difference in the
area of art. They do believe that it has a role "..as the fundamental
determinant of culture values." (paragraph two) Right now art shows
"...The exaltation of bravery, the willingness to kill and risk death
in tribal warfare".
The "function of war" concerning science is a different story.
What motivates the development of science on all levels.
A "substitution for the function of war" for art would simply be
for art to change. It could be used as previously "in a few primitive
peace-oriented system". (paragraph three) Art would be
"reassigned" to "...decoration, entertainment, or
ply...". it would be "entirely free of the burden of expressing
the socio-moral values and conflicts of a war-oriented society..."
In science a "substitution for the function of war" could be to
go into a "giant space research program" (paragraph four) They
have found, if all war threats were to end tomorrow, the quest for
scientific knowledge could go forward, without slowing down for
"perhaps two decades". (paragraph five) There are many
"unresolved" social issues that can be researched and dealt
We have combined section's five and six to show you that what the
"experts" said the "functions of war" are in our
society along with some of their "substitutions for the functions of
war". Section five ended with some extra comments that we will
They consider war a "general social release" (paragraph two) It
provides "the release and redistribution of undifferentiated
tensions". In other words, a type of therapy. It is a
"generational stabilizer" (paragraph three) that enables the
"deteriorating older generation" to "maintain control of
the younger, destroying it if necessary". It clears ideology. It is a
basis for international understanding.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Since war is not a "political issue" but used as a means of
control, if an "era of peace" were to come, there would have to
be drastic changes. Section Seven gives the "bottom line".
War has provided a dependable system to maintain economies. Any substitute
would have to be able to take the place of what war does to maintain
economies. There would have to be a way to take care of the
"waste" war does that will permit it to be independent of the
normal supply and demand economy. It must be subject to "arbitrary
political control". (paragraph three-Substitutes for Functions of
In the political aspect, war has been the foundation for a stable
government. Political authority is accepted. War has made it able "to
maintain necessary class distinctions". It also ensures the
"subordination of the citizen to the state" though the concept
of nationhood. (paragraph three, functions of war) The substitute for war
must make it so an external menace would require people to accept the
The sociological function has been able to control dangerous social
dissidence and destructive tendencies. It has been able to motivate human
behavior with social allegiance. To replace this, a credible omnipresent
and understood fear of personal destruction must be generated. This fear
must be big enough to transcend the value of an individual human to the
greater good of the whole.
The ecological function has been used to maintain a balance between gross
human population and the supplies available for its survival. The
substitute must insure the survival of the species. (man)
SUBSTITUTES FOR THE FUNCTIONS OF WAR: MODELS
Here are a few examples these "experts" came up with in order to
replace some of the functions of war. The economic function can be
replaced with an in depth social-welfare program. This program can be
directed towards the improvement of the conditions of human live. An
unreachable space research program is another option. Disarmament
inspection system with variants of such a system.
The political function can be a omnipresent (virtually omnipotent)
international police force. There should be an established and recognized
extraterrestrial menace. They recommend massive global and environmental
pollution. They even suggest fictitious alternate enemies.
The sociological function (they call the Control function) can be programs
derived from using the Peace Corps as a model. Slavery in a modern,
sophisticated form is another option. A motivational function to get
control can be intensified environmental pollution. Also, making new
religious or other mythologies. Socially oriented blood games is another
Since war isn't choosey on who dies, the ecological function can be a
comprehensive program of applied eugenics. (Plain English: breeding
I am going to end the summary of this report here. Yes, there is much more
in the report, but I believe you get the jest of it. I am going on to
bring this report into what is happening today.
ARE THE RECOMMENDATIONS BEING FOLLOWED?
This report was concluded in 1966. President Kennedy was shot before he
could explain what he was talking about at Columbia University. Johnson
ordered this Report to be sealed. The "experts" recommended that
no one, except those who needed to know, be exposed to the contents of
this report. One man, to whom the American people owe a debt of gratitude,
thought we had a right to know. Let's take a look at what has been going
on in America in the past 30 years. Are we being manipulated and
conditioned to accept a New World Order from an outline of 15 experts?
(Because of lack of space, I will be summarizing. I encourage people to
further investigate any examples given to verify).
I found it very interesting that these "experts" took all moral
issues out of their evaluations. Man was brought down to the level of
animals, like a herd of cattle that needed to have decided what was best
for the greater good of the herd. Who would have to be slaughtered and who
could be used to increase the herd? What could be done to get rid of the
excess members of the herd? What about the potentially
"criminal" cattle who would not go with what the owners decided
would be best?
This Report made us to be pawns that have been used to benefit the elite.
Great study and care was taken as what to do to re-condition these pawns
to a whole different type of thinking. These pawns who have been
conditioned so long to think one way. Though the types of things I will be
discussing are happening all over the world, I will be mainly talking
about America. There couldn't be a New World Order if America didn't fall
Since the legalizing of abortion, over twenty years ago, there have been
over 36 million Americans murdered before they could be born. That is more
Americans than have died in all the conflicts America has been involved
with all put together. American's have been conditioned to believe that
this is not "murder" but is "choice".
For Desert Storm, our soldiers had to have shots to "protect them
against chemical warfare". These shots were the germs of botchulism
and amthrax. Since then over 7000 of our best service men have died. see: The Resnick Interview with Peter Kawaja
Euthanasia and the "right to die with dignity" are being pushed
so the "quality of life" can be improved.
Extermination camps are being built to do away with
Aids is a government made disease that the spread of it is encouraged by
GLOBAL PEACE KEEPERS
The United Nations (UN) has a military that goes around the world as
"peace keepers". The members of the UN forces come from all
countries. These "peace keepers" are also stationed in the
United States in the closed bases throughout the country. They are also in
some of the bases that are opened. Foreign tanks and vehicles are coming
to America and secretly being painted white (UN color) in various military
installations around the country.
The US is disarming their military and closing down military bases all
over the country. Our president can sign an executive order that will put
the military under the command of the UN. US soldiers are already having
to put aside their oath and take the oath of the UN forces.
Racism is being pushed over the media and though the government. Should
riots develop, as in other countries, we will need a "peace
keeping" force in the US. They are ready.
NEW RELIGIONS? BLOOD SACRIFICES?
The New Age will be the only acceptable religion of the NWO. It is
everything against Christianity and has infiltrated every area of our
Satanism and other Occult religions are already having ritual human
When this was written, over 30 years ago they acknowledged that this would
be hard to convince the people of. Even with the UFO sightings that had
already been put out. What has happened in the past 30 years?
Well, there have been "alien abductions", and many more UFO
sightings. To top it off, there are UFO clubs where people who have
"seen aliens" or "been abducted" can get together for
To top that off, we have had over 25 years of Star Trek, which has
enforced a one world government. Throughout both series and the movies
they have the "New Age" philosophy. (New Age will be the only
philosophy accepted by the NWO) These folks have all kinds of experience
with various races on other planets. see: Dirty Watchtower
Secrets. // Like
Father Like Son: George W. Bush and the Fake Alien Invasion
Star Wars has also conditioned people to believe in a "galaxy far far
away". These reinforce extra terrestrial life on other planets. The
two movies, "V" and "V the Final Battle" and then the
series shows and invasion from another planet. The movie "Alien"
shows this also. The world would have to unite, should the "movies
and television programs" come to life with a "real" enemy.
of the Worlds" Mind Control Experiment - New World Order Test Run
There is not scientific evidence available to prove all the environmental
problems our government it trying to push on us. There is no such problem
as "global warming" for example. But, people such as Vice
President Gore and "NWO Lieutenant" Rockefeller
are coming out with books that if we don't unite as a world, to work
on the environmental problems, we will not survive. (Fictitious Enemy?)
Warming's Dirty New Secret // Global
Warming Claims Based on False Data
MORE FICTITIOUS ENEMIES
It is interesting that the media, with the help of the government, is
coming up with all these "potentially dangerous" groups of
people? These extremist groups, such as Christians, Militia members, talk
show hosts, right wing radicals, conservatives etc., are being mentioned
regularly as "potential terrorists". Between this and the racism
the government is pushing, it will make it easy for them to call a police
state, and round up all the people who disagree with them. Those
considered to be "enemies of the state". see: "Project
Anyone on welfare is already a slave to the government. They are working
on legislation where these people will have to work for their benefits.
After 1996, (around May) these benefits will not come in the form of cash
or food stamps. There will be a debit card. This will stop "welfare
fraud" and give the government more control over it's welfare slaves.
There are also several labor camps built, ready to activated. These labor
camps will be for strong prisoners who are considered
These experiments are already done on aborted babies. Thanks to a bill
signed into law by Pres. Clinton to support fetal experiments.
What many folks don't know about are the bio-spheres being built in the
mountains. (The two I know about are, in Washington state and North
Carolina.) No one can have access to these places now as they are
surrounded by guards. Bio-sphere is the UN term for Colony. It is rumored
that these "colonies" are being used for breeding of the
There are also concentration camps built that have "storage
facilities" for human organs. These camps will be used for genetic
I would like to comment that in all the reports this author has done, and
all the information I have read, Iron Mountain has had the biggest impact
on me. The fact that a few men can come up with a plan to bring a
"once free nation" into fascism upsets me. The fact that many of
their suggestions are being followed makes me angry. The fact the majority
of the American people don't know, and don't want to know is very
unbelievable to me.
I'm sure our founding fathers are "spinning in their graves" as
they watch us give up with out a fight what they fought and died for
without a fight.
NOW IS THE TIME FOR ALL GOOD MEN TO COME TO THE AID OF THEIR COUNTRY!
Copyright 1998 PropheZine - Bob Lally
editor of Wisdom and Freedom:
The Iron Mountain report was originally published by Dell. It is extremely
hard to find now. In the early 90s a sequel was published. The author of
this book took full credit for the first book and claimed that it was a
hoax. The only problem with this "hoax" is that everything in
the original book has worked out to be true. So whether the original title
is a hoax or not is irrelevant. The original book is a blueprint for the
present and the future. Click
here to find more about this controversial book from Simon &
Wisdom And Freedom
produced by WORLD
Copyright © 1999. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
full text of Iron Mountain: REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN: ON THE POSSIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF PEACE