| |
|
| |
|
|
THE LATEST MARS PICTURE - THE CLEAREST IMAGE OF ALL by gary d. goodwin & Raymond Ward 11 May 2000 http://tmgnow.com/repository/mars/mars4.html
Where Do We Look For The Answers? Question: What does the possibility of life on Mars, the obvious and proven clandestine behavior of the NASA/JPL Machine, and the upcoming Mars encounter with 76P have in common? With a little fine tuning and perhaps a little inspiration, we seem to be getting closer to the reality of what is being hidden from the tax payors about Mars. In our previous article Marshall Masters made the statement that, "...the people of the Earth will forever be denied knowledge that could forever change our lives for the better." It is easy to see how we have come to have such a lack of hope and such a great degree of skepticism concerning not only Mars, but the entire space program. Isn't the search for another "human-like" species in the universe a big part of NASA's focus, even if it is an unspoken ideal? Why else look for planets in remote star systems, and why are there hundreds of home computers, right at this moment, evaluating radio signals from deep space for the SETI program? When we examine the question of life on Mars, we need to first ask what kind of life are we talking about. It seems like everyone beats around the bush here and never comes out and says it! I think this gives the NASA folk some major room for movement. For instance, I think most people became really excited to hear a few years ago that life had been discovered from Mars. Of course the detail to that story was that it was "maybe" a microbe, wasn't found on Mars, but rather at the Antarctic. What kind of life is this? If this is alien life, then I can comfortably say that planet earth is covered in it. In fact we have creeping life, swimming life, and all kinds of intelligent life on the earth that isn't human. So if NASA finds intelligent life on Mars, will they come back later and say that it's a snake or just an amoeba? Think about it a bit! You are likely aware of the fact that it was only as recent as a decade ago, that we found previously unknown intelligent bipeds, on the earth. In the forests and jungles of New Guinea there exists a people that were not known to the general civilization of planet earth until just a few years ago! Are we frightened to say that there possibly exists proof of a past or even current civilization on Mars? I know... nutzoid. But that's what the machine wants you to think. What we have to say is not "nuts", but rather rational and factual. That's why TMG is always a target of that same Machine. As many readers of our page may know, we have recently been involved in the writings of Nostrodamus concerning The King of Terror. We stand by the statements made in these postings. Meanwhile we have watched anxiously the many developments on Mars. A few weeks ago, amidst all of these revelations, I received a very insightful and interesting email from one of our regular readers. Clearly it showed me that it's hard to see the trees for the forest! I had a jolt of reality shoot through me from my toes up to my head as I read the following:
Alright... There it is... Phobos = Terror. Phobos is Greek for Terror! Regardless of how we look at it, there seems to be a flashpoint or a "coming together of events" if you will, surrounding the Mars issue. But to clearly and coherently see the picture we must seriously consider as many of these important events and issues as possible. In our previous installment, Marshall Masters brought out many of the most salient points relevant to our effort. We must continue on - filling in every point and every building block to reach a believable and comfortable conclusion. Here I present a few more, for the case of Mars. Working Backwards: A Silence is Heard As I have stated, there seems to be a heightened fervor over Mars the last few months. It may be the loss of contact with recent Mars' projects, or it may be the coming comet 76P. We should surely consider the ongoing and undying issue of Cydonia. And now comes NASA's bitter determination to put a hold on any info out of the Mars' projects:
"Rethinking" sounds a whole lot like "kabosh" to this writer. Interesting that the talk will stop just before the 76P encounter with Mars. It may seem to some readers these are an unrelated set of non-issues. But the story is there if you are just willing to listen...
The launch was changed to October of 98 and the objectives were changed. Here is a report of that change:
Among the experiments on the vehicle is an integrated ultraviolet and infrared spectrograph, a camera, and plasma analyzer. An interesting combination of experiments when you consider some of the things I have for you in this posting, such as the growing atmosphere of Mars and the apparent destruction of previous Martian satellites. But let's stay on course here and not get ahead of ourselves! In other articles we have suggested the idea that NASA and/or JPL have an idea that they may be able to alter or change the trajectory of asteroids and/or comets. In one sense this would seem like a good idea to begin working on. There have been few sound ideas developed that could actually protect the Earth from a severe impact. But it seems logical that the sooner you attack the problem, the more likely you are to decrease the odds of a hit. So we put forth this idea with our exploration of the reasoning of putting 72 pounds of plutonium on the satellite Cassini (Is Cassini a Kamikaze Deep Space Probe?). Again, when we wrote about 76P and exposed the narrow encounter about to occur with Mars, we had no thought that DS1 was headed that way. The next day after posting the info on the close encounter, we were lambasted by the Machine. The original ephemeris was modified and the figure of 4 million miles (0.0431) was introduced. Everyone was apparently told to fall in line and had to make a statement that, "76P will most definitely NOT hit Mars." So is this just another coincidence? How many coincidences make up a fact? Is there a formula for something like that (C x X = f)? Here are the choices that come to my mind:
But the fact is, because of the so-called halt on the projects (let me remind you that this really means the door is shut and the meeting's going on on the other side of that door), we may never know for sure. Or will we? The Military Agenda The Deep Space Program was started at JPL to do space exploration more efficiently with lower costs - we are told. However there are some more coincidences that continue to pop up! It's becoming very hard to keep the lid on this monster. As Richard Hoagland has pointed out so effectively, the JPL - Cal Tech Oversight Committee is headed by Admiral Bobby Inman <http://www.enterprisemission.com/whosnasa.html>. So there's not much argument about who's calling the shots on the Mars projects. So why, so much military involvement in the various Mars' projects? Here's another kicker: The company that developed the DS1, Spectrum Astro, Inc., is primarily a military space manufacturing company. According to their homepage Spectrum Astro:
Spectrum's first public space launch was DS1. Their next satellite, coming up for launch is one that you have probably heard of also. It is unfortunately known for a negative distinction - when the satellite was being tested by NASA it was nearly obliterated by a vibration machine that shook it several hundred times harder than it should've been shaken! So we have a military committee hiring a military manufacturing company to explore Mars. The timing appears to suggest that Spectrum was a company set up, or at least supported in some manner, by the oversight committee for this exact need. During the mid seventies, with the addition of the Viking info coming to light, the move to militarize the Mars program was being put into place. I single out the Mars program, because we know that there have been other projects into space by the military long before the Mars situation. But this was one cat that was trying to come out of the bag with claws and teeth, and the campaign had to be put in place before the United States tax paying audience became too interested. As Marshall stated in the last installment, "The possibility that life could exist on Mars was already known before the Viking Lander ever touched down, and contingency plans had already been laid out to suppress any evidence, while giving the appearance of a open process." Maybe it's just another interesting tidbit (or coincidence) that in 1988 Spectrum Astro was founded. This military company was organized, even though its first satellite wasn't launched until 1998, just before the arrival of 76P. One They'd Like To Forget During the same period that Spectrum was being founded the heat was about to be turned up on the Mars controversy. Many newbies to the Mars ordeal may not be aware of this event, so let us bring it back into the forefront! Something was still brewing on Mars in the late 80's, regardless of the "lack" of attention that the story was getting. There were however, still a few hacking away at the "face on Mars" issue, but for all real intent it was drowning. The military, I'm sure, just wanted it to totally go away and they were no doubt very proud of their accomplishments in doing so, up to this point. But someone with more ability than the American Public was also interested in the goings on around Mars. It was the Russians. The good old Russians! Maybe they just wanted to put a burr in the military's side. Or maybe they heard it through the grapevine (polite for the Intelligence Community) that there was something up there and they had to see for themselves. There was something that prompted them to take two Venera Satellites out of mothballs and send them directly for Mars.
The first of the two - Phobos 1 was lost in transit to Mars. No explanation was ever really given - communications or something like that. It was just lost. But let me pause here and say, whenever I hear this I get very suspicious. I'm sorry I just don't trust government anymore to tell us the truth - any government. Yes, it's a real character deficit. But that doesn't make me a conspiracy nut. I'm still trying to understand why FBI agents allowed the Waco women and children to be gassed and burned to death. I know 'allowed' is not the right word. But I digress! The image above is of Phobos 2, however one and two were identical. Phobos 2 did make it to Mars. It was supposed to put two instrument packetts on the moon Phobos, but was lost upon approaching within 50M of the moon. The project goals were:
So why the rush to get there? Not one satellite with the same goals, but two. What was there that they had to see right away? Of course there is controversy. Here's just a few interesting occurrences and events surrounding Phobos two: Prior to P2's rendezvous with the Martian moon Phobos, it took a number of photos of the surface of Mars. One such photo was an infrared image showing subsurface canals and a network of crisscrossing parallel lines. The area was near the equator and covered about 600 square kilometers. Dr. John Becklake of the London Science Museum said it could easily be mistaken for an aerial photo of Los Angeles. The photo is not available. As the satellite moved closer to Phobos to attempt to dispatch the two probes, had cameras rolling (video cameras!), and picked up and transmitted images of something we might call a UFO. Contact was lost and the satellite assumed destroyed. There are so many incredible and outlandish stories about Phobos (the moon) we cannot cover them here. It seems difficult to believe that all of these stories, many by reputable sources and many by NASA/JPL/U.S. Military Machine themselves, could be false. Phobos orbits Mars almost perfectly around its equator. But unlike other moons and planets in the solar system, it orbits Mars entirely opposite to the rotation of Mars! Some have conjectured that it is a captured asteroid and not a part of the original accretion disk (that molten disk of material that cooled and became the planets - not a belief of TMG!). It has one huge crater and some very curios striations on its surface. One
important and very interesting statement about Phobos is as follows:
The claim by the Russians was that Phobos 2 was "shot out of orbit" by some type of plasma weapon upon approaching the Martian moon. You should know that Colonel Popovich claimed that the Russians had planned on taking action against what ever it was that was in or around Mars and Phobos. All of these claims are speculative and of course unfounded. However there was one image released of the object just immediately prior to the demise of the satellite.
These tower-like structures, as previously stated, have been seen in many images from the YUKOH and SOHO solar satellites. The explanation has always been pixelation, as stated above. This image is from a Russian newspaper first seen a number of years ago on the Larry King Live show. A larger an complete image of the article can be seen by clicking on the image. It's difficult to see how pixelation could cause what is being seen here. These anomalies, added to the many already known and including the recent so-called failures, add to an already suspicious mindset. Is it possible that none of these satellites failed? Who would know? I only suggest this as a possibility. The likelihood is that many failed while some are still gathering data. But why did they fail? Why is it that we do not already have a manned mission on the surface of Mars? There is something sorely lacking in the explanations that we, the tax paying public have been subject to. A Past Great Civilization? Life? In our last posting by Marshall Masters, Marshall mentions the altering of the Viking images to show an unreal red vista. Of course most people accepted the poorly colored image - it's Mars right? The RED planet? Below is an original high resolution image from the Viking Lander. The next image is one sent to me by an avid reader, with the hue modified to likely show the original or REAL view.
Of course this doesn't prove much, but it does show what is possible with the right tools. With the right tools, we as a people can be influenced to believe anything. Maybe the reason for hiding the truth is to protect us. Yeah right. But the question of a past civilization on Mars would cause great consternation to people everywhere. To those that still think that the earth is at the center of the universe, both physically and philosophically, this would be shattering. To those in power (whom I believe already know the answer), the existence of a past intelligent civilization would be - simply - an opportunity. And usually when opportunities arise, they take whatever measures possible to control it and then to methodically exploit every possible avenue of that resource. Such is the case with earthly resources such as oil, land, labor and economics. There's really no need to establish this fact here at this time. It is well known. If there was civilization on Mars at one time, and it is appearing more and more that the evidence is irrefutable, there will no doubt be invaluable resources there. This is likely the case because the civilization would not have little green men nor gray aliens. Little green men and gray aliens are not what TMG is about. If a civilization did exist at one time on Mars, it would have likely been a humanoid race. But that explanation is for another time and another posting. Regardless of what race occupied Mars, it is evident that there was once a great catastrophe on the planet. Stones strewn across the landscape and evidence of weathered architecture. These are the evidences that are left. But why accept that the civilization is no longer there? We have been told over and over that the atmosphere is violent if nonexistent. No water to be seen - only an essence of such. But there are stories of a hollow moon (Phobos) and underground canals and structures. Maybe their still there. Sounds like science fiction! But why can't we prove it once and for all? Maybe we have - we just don't know it! Are We Protecting Something, Or Hoping That Something Will Be Destroyed?
Take note of the cyclonic cloud on the planet, just to the left and below the northern ice cap. The cloud not only appears to be spinning, but also has what we refer to as an "eye". Yes... this is a hurricane on Mars. This isn't a manufactured image - this is real. In all of history, there is not one recorded instance of a hurricane. Let's call it Hurricane Alpha. Just as a comparison, consider Hurricane Mitch of the 99 hurricane season, a category 5+ hurricane. Mitch dumped over six feet of rain within a few hours. The eye of Hurricane Mitch at one point measured 50 miles in diameter. These are ways that we can compare the energy and output of the storms. We can begin to develop a baseline when we look at other hurricanes in comparison to Mitch. For instance, there were two Philippine typhoons (Pacific Hurricanes) in the 98' season that each dumped approximately 20 inches of rain. The eye wall diameter on these hurricanes measured an average of 30 miles. It is our belief that the eye is the point of electrical charge dispersal from the upper atmosphere to the earth below. Therefore you can measure the amount of electrical charge in a storm by the size of the eye and amount of hydrogen combined with oxygen/ozone (water!) the storm dumps. Since we are doing a simple comparison there is no need to use the entire formula for area of the eye - we need to only compare the squares of the radius. Thus the area of Mitch's eye is 25miles squared = 625 miles. If you measure the area of the hurricane eye on Mars (in the image above), as compared to the size of the planet, you come up with the conservative figure of 250 miles in diameter or 125 miles radius. For ease sake and to squeeze it down another conservative notch, let's just call it 100 miles radius. So comparing with Mitch we have 100 miles squared = 10,000 miles! To figure the difference or the ratio between the power of Mitch as compared to the power of Hurricane Alpha, or 10,000 divided by 625 you get a figure of about 16 times. In other words, if you can't follow my mathematical gibberish, Hurricane Alpha on Mars is 16 times more powerful than Mitch! That's quite a wallop if you realize that Mars is considerably smaller than the Earth.
Another indication that hurricanes are electrically powerful storms and that this charge is passed through the earth's crust and from above through the atmosphere, is the example of this past years' hurricanes off of the east coast of the U.S.. If you recall, we had one of the most devistating hurricanes in many years this last season. There were two hurricanes that traveled over the entire east coast, one was Floyd. These storms caused immense flooding and untold damage. They carried with them a great charge being distributed and equalized throughout the crust - primarily along the eastern seaboard. And amazingly, a new discovery with far reaching indications was announced just a few weeks ago. Here is the report as we posted it on Hal Blondell's New Millennium Bulletin:
Was it the dumping of the charge into the area of the east coast the cause of the newly discovered rift? It seems that a feature such as this - a feature which could cause such a tidal wave - would've been known to scientists for sometime. This area is heavily traveled by the Navy. Would you think that they would simply have NOT noticed? I sincerely believe that the rift was the direct result of electrical dumping by solar storms, via hurricanes. [P.S. Over the past two days 5/16-5/17/00, there has been a powerful solar storm occuring. Today, 5/18/00, the weather went wild in the midwest. Even a catagory 4 tornado in Nebraska! THERE IS A CONNECTION!] Is what is happening on Mars history? Or rather is this a current event on Mars? Is there a great amount of water just under the surface of Mars? Are there great spaces and expanses (cave-like structures) under the surface? Also to be taken into consideration - forever we were taught that Mons Olympus was the tallest mountain on Mars. In the last few years they have began to say that there is another mountain taller. Could there be a dynamic and changing crust on Mars? Hydrostatic pressure could account for much of what we have discussed. The canals discovered are over a mile wide and many miles deep and lie several miles under the surface. It appears with each passing comet that the surface of Mars is changing along with its atmosphere. Mars is terraforming. Classical explanations of Mars' atmosphere have taught us that the atmosphere of Mars is only 1/100th that of the Earth's, or only 1-2% that of the Earth's. And further we were taught that the field of Mars is only 1/800th of the Earth. The Mars Surveyor Mission itself has shown us that this is just not the case any longer. In order to save the satellite from being dragged down to the surface and crashing, the satellite had to be literally raised in its orbit. These figures are just no longer valid. Mars is terraforming. In past postings we have established the electrical connection between the Sun and Venus. We have also been witness to the flux tube connection between Jupiter and its moon Io. In fact the strong activity between Jupiter and Io is believed to be responsible for the great amount of volcanic activity on Io. Io orbits Jupiter at 400,000 miles. We are currently estimating that comet 76P will come within 40,000 miles of Mars. When Hale Bopp passed through the solar system, one of the greatest dust storms ever, occurred on Mars. When Lee came through we saw the first hurricane ever on Mars. Will 76P be "sucked" into the planet from the charge well? Or will there be a connection made between the two that will cause great damage to the planet. Or will it increase the apparent terraforming going on? Close to the same time that the comet passes Mars, the comet will pass through the ecliptic. It is a known fact that when comets pass through the strong electrical environment of the ecliptic, comets often fall apart. Velikovsky has theorized that there was a great "war" between the comet Venus and Mars many years ago. The closest known passage of a comet to the Earth was in the year 1491 at a distance of 0.0094. That's a considerably further distance than 76P will pass Mars. And what was the purpose of sending Deep Space One to the comet? Did it really go to the comet? Or was it reassigned like they tell us? Would they possibly believe that they could redirect the comet closer or farther away from Mars? I wouldn't put it past them! Maybe the comet will not affect the planet. Maybe it will yank Phobos free. If it does, where will it go? Just maybe their plan to affect the planet Mars through the actions of 76P will backfire. Seems like all of the satellites that they send there have been wasted effort. Or have they? What are they hiding? Gary d.
goodwin The Millennium Group Mars Exploration Propositions:
|
"Dear Mr. Goodwin,
The
Deep Space One mission was put together as the first of a number of
missions to display JPL's new attitude of lower spending - more bang for
the buck - so to speak. The original mission was to do fly-bys of asteroid
McAuliffe, Mars (including a fly-by of Phobos), and comet 76P. That's
correct - 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura! It was scheduled for launch July 1st,
1998. I say 'was' because the schedule was supposedly changed. More on
that in a bit. You can see why I have suggested that there is a
"coming together of events". At the time we wrote about 76P and
its close encounter with Mars, I had completely forgotten about DS1. One
of the reasons that this had slipped my mind, was that the original
mission had been changed and played down. Bad press is bad press, and JPL
doesn't need anymore of it!
"NASA 's Deep Space One
(DS1) spacecraft is scheduled to be launched in 1998 to travel to
asteroid McAuliffe in 1999 and the comet West-Kohoutek-Ikemura in 2000.
DS1 is the first scheduled mission in the NASA New Millennium program,
which is designed to test and validate cutting edge technology for the
systems and instruments on-board future NASA science spacecraft. The
artificial intelligence (AI), Remote Agent, software on board DS1 is
being developed at NASA Ames Research Center in collaboration with
spacecraft engineers and computer scientists at the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, CA. Remote Agent is the first AI system that
will control a spacecraft."
The
interesting thing is this: their interests lie primarily with Martian moon
Phobos. Thus the satellites were named Phobos 1 and Phobos 2. The
satellites were sturdy - another euphemism! They were said to be
built like Russian tanks! There was more hardware and shielding on these
sats than anything we build. Again - those good old Russians! Actually,
others of the same type and build went to Venus and to the comet Haley. So
they had to be pretty tough.
This
image was taken by the HST just after the passage of a large energetic
comet a couple of years ago (remember this fact - it's important!). Just a
couple of questions here: If Mars has no atmosphere, why are there obvious
clouds on the surface? What happens to water in a zero pressure
atmosphere?
Please
stay with me on this one. This is very important considering the upcoming
encounter with 76P. First some more questions. If this hurricane is so
large - and we truly believe that it is/was - where did the water for the
storm come from? Where did the water go from the storm? Afterall, this
means that Hurricane Alpha dumped 16X's the amount of water than Mitch
did! What if it only dumped half of the water - say 8X's six feet of
water. Where is it? It is important to note that the above mentioned
satellite - Phobos 2 and another recent trip to Mars - The Surveyor - have
both mapped underground canals with infrared cameras. On Earth there are
numerous aquifers or underground lakes of water ("The fountains of
the deep").
in
a tremendous state of upheaval," Garvin said. Channels beneath the
northern lowlands could have flowed from Valles Marineris and the Chryse
and Kasei Valles regions, NASA scientists said. The researchers used
gravity and elevation measurements from MGS to spot the features, about
125 miles (200 km) wide and more than 1,000 miles (1,600 km) long. Water
flowing on the surface or underground in channels and later buried by
sediments could explain the appearance of the features. Their large size
suggests that part or parts of the northern lowlands rapidly filled with
water. "