A Military Flag
And to further confirm and understand the significance of what I have told you, you need to understand the fringe on the United States flag. Read the following.
First the appearance of our flag is defined in Title 4 sec. 1. U.S.C.. "The flag of the United States shall be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white; and the union of the flag shall be forty-eight stars, white in a blue field." (my note - of course when new states are admitted, new stars are added.)
A foot note was added on page 1113 of the same section which says: "Placing of fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag, and arrangement of the stars are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but within the discretion of the President as commander-in-chief of the Army and Navy." 1925, 34 Op.Atty.Gen. 483.
The president, as military commander, can add a yellow fringe to our flag. When would this be done? During time of war. Why? A flag with a fringe is an ensign, a military flag. Read the following.
"Pursuant to U.S.C. Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE, bordered on three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces."
From the National Encyclopedia, Volume 4:
"...The agency of the master is devolved upon him by the law of the flag. The same law that confers his authority ascertains its limits, and the flag at the mast-head is notice to all the world of the extent of such power to bind the owners or freighters by his act. The foreigner who deals with this agent has notice of that law, and, if he be bound by it, there is not injustice. His notice is the national flag which is hoisted on every sea and under which the master sails into every port, and every circumstance that connects him with the vessel isolates that vessel in the eyes of the world, and demonstrates his relation to the owners and freighters as their agent for a specific purpose and with power well defined under the national maritime law." Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914.
Don't be thrown by the fact they are talking about the sea, and that it doesn't apply to land. Admiralty law came on land in 1845 with the Act of 1845 by Congress. Next a court case:
"Pursuant to the "Law of the
Flag", a military flag does result in jurisdictional implication when
flown. The Plaintiff cites the following: "Under what is called
international law, the law of the flag, a shipowner who sends his vessel
into a foreign port gives notice by his flag to all who enter into
contracts with the shipmaster that he intends the law of the flag to
regulate those contracts with the shipmaster that he either submit to its
operation or not contract with him or his agent at all." Ruhstrat v.
People, 57 N.E. 41, 45, 185 ILL. 133, 49 LRA 181, 76 AM.
I have had debates with folks that take
great issue with what I have said, they dogmatically say the constitution
is the law and the government is outside the law. I wish they were right,
but they fail to see or understand that the American people have been
conquered, unknowingly, but conquered all the same. That is why a judge
will tell you not to bring the Constitution into his court, or a law
dictionary, because he is the law, not the Constitution. You have only to
read the previous Senates report on National Emergency, to understand the
Constitution and our Constitutional form of government no longer exists.
I fail to understand how the American
people could have been so dumbed down as to not see that the Social
Security system is fraudulent and that it is based on socialism, which is
the redistribution of wealth, right out of the communist manifesto. The
Social Security system first, is fraud, it is insolvent and was never
intended to be. It is used for a national identification number, and a
requirement to receive benefits from the conquers (king). The Social
Security system is made to look and act like insurance, all insurance is
governed by admiralty law, which is the kings way of binding those
involved with commerce with him.
"The Social Security system may be
accurately described as a form of Social Insurance, enacted pursuant to
Congress' power to "spend money in aid of the 'general
welfare'," Helvering vs. Davis [301 U.S., at 640]
"My judgment accordingly is, that
policies of insurance are within... the admiralty and maritime
jurisdiction of the United States." Federal Judge Story, in DELOVIO
VS. BOIT, 7 Federal Cases, #3776, at page 444 (1815)
You need to know and understand what
contribution means in F.I C. A., Federal Insurance Contribution Act. Read
the following definition.
Contribution. Right of one who has
discharged a common liability to recover of another also liable, the
aliquot portion which he ought to pay or bear. Under principle of
"contribution," a tort-feasor against whom a judgement is
rendered is entitled to recover proportional shares of judgement from
other joint tort- feasor whose negligence contributed to the injury and
who were also liable to the plaintiff. (cite omitted) The share of a loss
payable by an insure when contracts with two or more insurers cover the
same loss. The insurer's share of a loss under a coinsurance or similar
provision. The sharing of a loss or payment among several. The act of any
one or several of a number of co-debtors, co-sureties, etc., in
reimbursing one of their number who has paid the whole debt or suffered
the whole liability, each to the extent of his proportionate share.
(Blacks Law Dictionary 6th ed.)
Thereby making you obligated for the
national debt. The Social Security system is one of the contractual nexus'
between you and the king. Because you are involved in the kings commerce
and have asked voluntarily for his protection, you have accomplished the
following. You have admitted that you are equally responsible for having
caused the national debt and that you are a wrong doer, as defined by the
above legal definition. You have admitted to being a Fourteenth Amendment
citizen, who only has civil rights granted by the king. By being a
Fourteenth Amendment citizen, you have agreed that you do not have
standing in court to question the national debt. Keep in mind this is
beyond the status of our country and people, which I covered earlier in
this paper. We are in this system of law because of the conquest of our
Congress has transferred its
Constitutional obligation of coining money to the federal reserve, the
representatives of the king, this began after the Civil War and the
overturning of the U.S. Constitution, as a result of CONGEST. You have
used this fiat money without objection, which is a commercial benefit,
supplied by the kings bankers. Fiat money has no real value, other than
the faith in it, and you CANNOT pay a debt with fiat money, because it is
a debt instrument. A federal reserve note is a promise to pay and is only
evidence of debt. The benefit you have received is you are allowed to
discharge your debt, which means you pass on financial servitude to
someone else. The someone else is our children.
When you go to the grocery store and hand
the clerk a fifty dollar federal reserve note you have stolen the
groceries and passed fifty dollars of debt to the seller. Americans try to
acquire as much of this fiat money as they can. If Americans were aware of
this; it wouldn't matter to them, because they don't care if the
merchandise is stolen as long as it is legal. But what happens if the
system fails? Those with the most fiat money or real property, which was
obtained with fiat money will be forfeited to the king, everything that
was obtained with this fiat money reverts back to the king temporary, I
will explain in the conclusion of this paper. Because use of his fiat
money is a benefit, supplied by the king's bankers; it all transfers back
to the king. The king's claim to the increase in this country comes from
the original Charter of 1606. But, it is all hidden, black is white and
white is black, wealth is actually debt and financial slavery.
For those that do not have a Social
Security number or think they have rescinded it, you are no better off. As
far as the king is concerned you are subject to him also. Why? Well, just
to list a couple of reasons other than conquest. You use his money and as
I said before, this is discharging debt, without prosecution. You use the
goods and services that were obtained by this fiat money, to enrich your
life style and sustain yourself. You drive or travel, which ever
definition you want to use, on the king's highways and roads for pleasure
and to earn a living; meaning you are involved in the king's commerce. On
top of these reasons which are based on received benefits, this country
HAS BEEN CONQUERED!
I know a lot of patriots won't like this.
Your (our) argument has been that the government has and is operating
outside of the law (United States Constitution). Believe me I don't like
sounding like the devils advocate, but as far as international law goes;
and the laws that govern War between countries, the king/queen of England
rule this country, first by financial servitude and then by actual
Conquest and Military Occupation. The Civil War was the beginning of the
Conquest, as evidenced by the Fourteenth Amendment. This Amendment did
several things, as already mentioned. It created the only citizenship
available to the conquered and declared that these citizens had no
standing in any court to challenge the monetary policies of the new
government. Why? So the king would always receive his gain from his
Commercial venture. The Amendment also eliminated your use of natural
rights and gave the Conquered civil rights. The Conquered are governed by
public policy, instead of Republic of self-government under God Almighty.
Your argument that this can't be, is frivolous and without merit, the
evidence is conclusive.
Nothing has changed since before the
All persons whose activities in King's
Commerce are such that they fall under this marine-like environment, are
into an invisible Admiralty Jurisdiction Contract. Admiralty Jurisdiction
is the KING'S COMMERCE of the High Seas, and if the King is a party to the
sea-based Commerce (such as by the King having financed your ship, or the
ship is carrying the King's guns), then that Commerce is properly governed
by the special rules applicable to Admiralty Jurisdiction. But as for that
slice of Commerce going on out on the High Seas without the King as a
party, that Commerce is called Maritime Jurisdiction, and so Maritime is
the private Commerce that transpires in a marine environment. At least,
that distinction between Admiralty and Maritime is the way things once
were, but no more. George Mercier, Invisible Contracts, 1984.
What Lincoln and Jefferson said about the
true American danger was very prophetic.
"All the armies of Europe, Asia and
Africa combined could not, by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a
track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then
is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us it
must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be
our lot, we ourselves must be its author and finisher. Abraham Lincoln
"Our rulers will become corrupt, our
people careless... the time for fixing every essential right on a legal
basis is [now] while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united. From the
conclusion of this war we shall be going downhill. It will not then be
necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be
forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget
themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think
of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles,
therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war,
will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights
shall revive or expire in a convulsion. Thomas Jefferson
Below are the political platforms of the
Democrats and the Republicans, as you can see there is no difference
between the two, plain socialism. They are both leading America to a World
government, just as Cornwallis said, and that government will be the
British empire or promoted by the British.
"We have built foundations for the
security of those who are faced with the hazards of unemployment and old
age; for the orphaned, the crippled, and the blind. On the foundation of
the Social Security Act we are determined to erect a structure of economic
security for all our people, making sure that this benefit shall keep step
with the ever increasing capacity of America to provide a high standard of
living for all its citizens." DEMOCRATIC PARTY PLATFORM OF 1936, at
page 360, infra.
"Real security will be possible only when our productive capacity is sufficient to furnish a decent standard of living for all American families and to provide a surplus for future needs and contingencies. For the attainment of that ultimate objective, we look to the energy, self-reliance and character of our people, and to our system of free enterprise. "Society has an obligation to promote the security of the people, by affording some measure of protection against involuntary unemployment and dependency in old age. The NEW DEAL policies, while purporting to provide social security, have, in fact, endangered it. "We propose a system of old age security, based upon the following principles:
1. We approve a PAY AS YOU GO policy, which requires of each generation the support of the aged and the determination of what is just and adequate.
2. Every American citizen over 65 should receive a supplemental payment necessary to provide a minimum income sufficient to protect him or her from want.
3. Each state and territory, upon complying with simple and general minimum standards, should receive from the Federal Government a graduated contribution in proportion to its own, up to a fixed maximum.
4. To make this program consistent with sound fiscal policy the Federal revenues for this purpose must be provided from the proceeds of a direct tax widely distributed. All will be benefitted and all should contribute. "We propose to encourage adoption by the states and territories of honest and practical measures for meeting the problems of employment insurance. "The unemployment insurance and old age annuity of the present Social Security Act are unworkable and deny benefits to about two-thirds of our adult population, including professional men and women and all engaged in agriculture and domestic service, and the self-employed, while imposing heavy tax burdens upon all."
- REPUBLICAN PARTY PLATFORM OF 1936, at page 366.
Both PLATFORMS appear in NATIONAL PARTY PLATFORMS -- 1840 TO 1972;
compiled by Ronald Miller [University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois (1973)