| |
|
Connecting
the Dots . . .
What
would a President have to do to create an “enabling environment” for the
accomplishment of a mission he had in mind...
A. Agencies whose mission statements give total control to the President.
1) Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
2) National Security Agency (NSA)
a) Appoint a new director of the FBI - 9/1/93.
b) Position a key figure in the DOJ
e) Position a key figure as
Chairman of the IOB who now has the discretionary authority
over intelligence information brought before the PFIAB.
2) National Security Council (NSC).
a) Position a key figure as the National Security Advisor.
II.
Select the key figures for
future placement in critical positions supporting the mission.
B. Chairman of the IOB: Anthony S.
Harrington, is a senior partner of the international
law firm of Hogan and Hartson (with Berger) and, as a senior partner, receives
benefits,
either directly or indirectly, from dealings with China and Russia. Mr.
Harrington is still
listed as an attorney with Hogan and Hartson.
C. Chairman of the PFIAB: Warren B.
Rudman, is a partner in the international law firm
of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton
& Garrison with offices in Communist China and who,
as a partner, receives benefits, either directly or indirectly, from dealings
with Communist
China.
D. Department of Justice with jurisdiction over the FBI
1) Appoint Assistant Attorney General
Webster Hubbell whose strong ties to the
Chinese Communists and John Huang (formerly of the Commerce Department) and his
other criminal activity are well documented.
2) Inspector General of the DOJ: Michael
R. Bromwich who is/was a partner in the
Washington D.C. office of Mayer, Brown & Platt.
The firm has offices in Moscow and
Beijing, with emphasis on Communist China. If he is still a partner, on leave of
absence
or not, he is benefiting from the firm's dealings with China and Russia.
traditionally the strongest voice against technology exports, and Clinton made
several
appointments calculated to change the culture. William J. Perry, an executive at
a Silicon
Valley company was vocally opposed to the existing system of export controls”.
H. Overturn Secretary of State Warren
Christoper’s classified order of 10/9/95. (As the
New York Times 5/17/98 put it: “President Clinton took the unusual step of
reversing
Christopher’s decision.” The order was overturned March 1996.)
J. Appoint William S. Daley Secretary of
Commerce, Clinton’s 1992 Illinois Campaign
Manager, who appears to have been involved in questionable activities in the
Chicago area
involving fraud, the IRS and the FBI (http://www.crl.org/daleygeo.html). The
lawsuit
against Daley and his firm Daley and George, which dragged on for 5 years,
(1992-1997)
was suddenly dropped by the ‘prosecutor’ exactly one month after Daley was
sworn in as
Secretary of Commerce on 1/31/97. Also, he may have misrepresented himself in
his
Senate confirmation hearings. Mr. Daley is/was a partner in the international
law firm of
Mayer, Brown & Platt where he was "concentrating in the area of
corporate and
government relations matters" (paid lobbyist?). The firm has offices in
Moscow and
Beijing, with emphasis on Communist China. If he is still a partner, on leave of
absence or
not, he is benefiting from the firm's dealings with China and Russia.
A. Executive Order #12946 – 1/20/95 – President’s Advisory Board on Arms
Proliferation
Policy. (Established a board to advise the President on implementation of U.S.
conventional arms transfer policy and other issues related to arms proliferation
policy.)
(The authorization of physical searches for foreign
intelligence purposes.)
C. Executive Order #12951 - 2/24/95 - Release of Imagery Acquired by Space-Based
National
Intelligence. (Declassification of imagery acquired by the three space-based
national
intelligence reconnaissance systems and review for future public release of
intelligence
imagery.)
D. Executive Order #12958 - 3/21/95 - Classified National Security Information.
(Prescribes a
uniform system for classifying, safeguarding,
and declassifying national security
information.)
E. Executive Order #12968 - 8/2/95 - Access to Classified Information (“This
order
establishes a uniform Federal personnel security program for employees who will
be
considered for initial or continued access to classified information.” “… in order to protect
our citizens, our democratic institutions, and our participation with the
community of
nations. The unauthorized disclosure of information classified in the national interest can
cause irreparable damage to the national security and loss of human life.”)
(Clinton, who
has never been investigated for a Top Security Clearance, carefully excluded
himself from
this order; otherwise, under this EO, he would be denied access to classified
information.)
V.
As Vernon Jordan would say - "Mission
accomplished".
Is
it a coincidence that the two 'appointees', who have authority over the
dissemination of information to the President regarding National Security,
Berger and Harrington, are both partners in the same international law firm that
has dealings with China and Russia? And that these two 'appointees' are
currently listed as attorneys in the Washington branch of Hogan and Hartson
(website updated August 1998), where they are, as partners, directly or
indirectly, receiving benefits from dealings with China and Russia. This clearly
is a conflict of interest (allegiances) which, by law, should deny them a
security clearance and access to classified material.
Is
it a coincidence that the Inspector General of the DOJ Michael R. Bromwich and
the Secretary of Commerce William S. Daley were both partners in the
international law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt, working out of the firm's
Washington office? The firm has offices in Moscow and Beijing, with emphasis on
China. If they are still partners in the firm, on leave of absence or not, they
are benefiting, directly or indirectly, from the firm's dealings with China and
Russia and hence have a conflict of interest (allegiances) which, by law, should
deny them a security clearance and access to classified material.
Also,
George Tenet, Director of the CIA, and Sandy Berger, National Security Advisor,
both served on Clinton's national security transition team - a totally failed
exercise demonstrating, at best, no knowledge or concern for National Security
and the appropriate clearances.
(Security
irregularities during the ‘transition’ period are well documented. For
example, WSJ 10/05/98 states “14 months into Clinton's first term, more than
100 staffers lacked security clearances”. House Report 104-862 states “In
general, the FBI files issue shows a lack of respect by the Clinton
administration for proper security procedures to protect both the President of
the United States and the national security. This is all the more so since the
White House ignored recommendations from a Democratic committee chairman of the
U.S. Senate to take security precautions in response to reported security
irregularities in the first years of the Clinton administration.”)
Intentional
or not, this provides serious doubt about their ability to handle such high
positions in our National Security system.
This
summary of events does not begin to scratch the surface, as we do not have
access to official information on all those appointees who 'resigned', 'died' or
were indicted. An examination of the background and 'allegiances' of those
individuals should be considerably more telling than those included here.
And
then there are all the rest of Clinton's appointees who are still employed by
our Government, whose 'bios' are not in the public domain - most of whom appear
to be, at best, grossly incompetent and passing off on any and all of Clinton's
plans, or at worst . . . . .
The
information in this summary was obtained from official websites:.gov, AOL yellow
pages, and webpages of the law firms mentioned herein, with limited use of the
regular AOL search of highly reliable sources. While the information included
herein is certainly believed to be factual, the readers are left to ponder the
evidence and implications and to draw their own conclusions. While we do not
state that any of the above mentioned persons are consciously involved in any
illegal activity, the facts are certainly curious.
This
outlined scenario is an attempt to bring to light the ease with which a corrupt
President could destroy our National Security. Hopefully, Congress will exercise
every option to stop the damage.
Add
this information to the Cox Report, the Thompson Report, the Judicial Watch
investigations, the cover-up of espionage, and other treasonous
'accomplishments' of this Administration and the question must be asked:
Is this a coincidence,
Or
a carefully crafted plan to sell out America?
This
summary was prepared by: Gretchen Glass
Please use this information ‘at your pleasure’!