Who is running America? Have you ever
asked that question?
Under the doctrine of Parens
Patriae, "Government As Parent", as a result of the
manipulated bankruptcy of the United States of America in 1930, ALL
the assets of the American people, their person, and of our country
itself are held by the Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street,
NY, NY, secured by UCC Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as "debt
money" by the Federal Reserve. It may interest you to know
that under the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies the
CEDE Corporation, the Federal Reserve Corporation and the American Bar
Association, the legal arm of the banking interests.
Now you know who is running America!
You might want to take exception
to the name on the marquee at the entrance to 55 Water Street. .
. . "Tower of Power" . . . ???
Did you ever hear of the Independent Treasury Act of 1921?
No, you say.... Hmmmmmmm....?
The Independent Treasury Act of 1921 suspended the de
jure (meaning "by right of legal
establishment") Treasury Department of the United States
government. Our Congress turned the treasury department over to a
private corporation, the Federal Reserve and their agents. The bulk of
the ownership of the Federal Reserve System, a very well kept secret
from the American Citizen, is held by these banking interests:
Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
The Federal Reserve is at the root of most of our
present laws. Basically, the Federal Reserve is the "STATE" of
the United States.
Enemy, The STATE" by Albert J. Nock - 1935, his Classic
Critique Distinguishing "Government"
from the "STATE."
See Also Charts
in Text Format of Interlocking Directorships and Family Linkages
taken from "Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate
and Banking Influence. Staff Report, Committee on Banking,
Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 94th Congress, 2nd
Session, August 1976."
Thomas Jefferson once said:
"I believe that banking
institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies .
. . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue
of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and
corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the
people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the
continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be
taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly
belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson -- The Debate Over The
Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)
prophesy has come true.
How did this happen? ......Hmmmmm.....
Well, that is going to take a while to explain.
All our law is private law, written by The National
Law Institute, Law Professors, and the Bar Association, the Agents of
Foreign Banking interests. They have come to this position of writing
the law by fraudulently deleting the "Titles
of Nobility and Honour" Thirteenth Amendment from the
Constitution for the United States, creating an oligarchy of Lawyers and
Bankers controlling all three branches of our government. Most of our
law comes directly through the Hague or the U.N. Almost all U.N.
treaties have been codified into the U.S. codes. That's where all our
educational programs originate. The U.N. controls our education system.
The Federal Register Act was created by Pres.
Roosevelt in 1935. Title 3 sec. 301 et seq. by Executive Order. He gave
himself the power to create federal agencies and appoint a head of the
agency. He then re-delegated his authority to make law (statutory
regulations) to those agency heads. One big problem there, the president
has no constitutional authority to make law. Under
the Constitution re-delegation of delegated authority is a felony
The president then gave the agencies the authority to
tax. We now have government by appointment running this country. This is
the shadow government sometimes spoken about, but never referred to as
government by appointment. This type of government represents taxation
Perhaps this is why some people believe the
Constitution was suspended. It wasn't suspended, it was buried in
bureaucratic red tape.
Now, it is an historical fact that with the
Declaration of Independence, to provide a united effort during and after
the War for Independence, the Colonies as independent nations joined
together under the Articles of Confederation, and as Independent
Sovereign States drew up constitutions which formed governments to serve
the people of each former colony. The Articles of Confederation, after a
period of 8 years, were determined to have several flaws. The Congress
of delegates called a Convention in 1787 to correct the flaws. The
Convention, instead of modifying the Articles of Confederation as
directed, in secret sessions took it upon themselves to write an
entirely new Constitution, which when ratified by the State Conventions
of the Freemen of the Individual States, created the Federal government
to serve them in those areas where the States operating individually
could not effectively serve. In this new Constitution the people and the
States delegated to the Federal government certain responsibilities,
reserving all rights not so enumerated to the States and to the People
in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. As a consequence, the
responsibility of the State became one of protecting the people from the
tyranny of federal government, to insure that the federal government did
not reach beyond the bounds of the Constitution. This worked fairly
effectively, until 1933 when Roosevelt assumed office.
The Conference of Chief Justices, Conference of State
Court Administrators, the National Associations of Attorney Generals,
Secretaries of State and State Auditors, State Purchasing Offices,
Lieutenant Governors, and State Legislators, and the Governors of the 50
states comprise the membership of the Council of State Governments. The
Council of State Governments is located at 676 N. ST. Clair, Chicago,
The Council of State Governments has now been
absorbed into the National Conference on Uniform State Laws run by the
The movement for uniform state laws dates back more
than a century. The Alabama State Bar called for uniformity as early as
1881, but it was nearly a decade later, at the 12th annual meeting of
the ABA in 1889, that the legal community made its formal motion to work
for uniformity in the then 44 state union. New York was the first state
to move, appointing three commissioners in 1890. Other states soon
heeded the call: Delaware, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York,
New Jersey, and Pennsylvania attended the first Conference in Saratoga
Springs, New York, in 1892. The commissioners wasted no time. They urged
adoption of three acts and proposed raising the marrying age to 18 for
males and 16 for females. They also adopted a table of weights and
measures, noting that with the exception of wheat, legal weights of a
bushel varied in all the states.
By the turn of the century, 33 states and two
territories had appointed commissioners on uniform laws. In 1910, only
Nevada and the Territory of Alaska still had not; they came aboard in
100 YEARS OF UNIFORM LAWS
An Abridged Chronology
1890 - New York state legislature passes first
state act authorizing governor to appoint three commissioners. The
American Bar Association (ABA)recommends that other states follow New
1891 - Connecticut's Lyman D. Brewster named
to chair newly-created ABA committee on uniform law. Pennsylvania,
Michigan, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Delaware appoint commissioners.
1892 - First conference held in Saratoga
Springs New York. Above states plus Georgia attend formal meeting.
1893 - Committees appointed on such subjects
as wills, marriage and divorce, commercial law, descent and
1895 - Conference requests committee on
commercial law be formed. Drafts, Negotiable Instrument Law, precursor
to Article 3 of Uniform Commercial Code.
1896 - Negotiable Instrument Law approved by
Conference. First time that a uniform act is adopted in every state and
the District of Columbia.
1897 - For the first time, Commissioners urged
to work toward enactment of uniform legislation in their states.
1898/1899 - Sessions devoted to the
consideration of proposed divorce legislation.
1899 - At the end of the 1890s, 33 of the
existing 45 states and two territories had appointed uniform law
commissioners and eight uniform acts had been drafted, each enacted in
at least one state. All these acts were subsequently superseded or
1900 - Uniform Divorce Procedure Act adopted.
Louis B. Brandeis begins five years of service as member of
1901 - Woodrow Wilson begins tenure (until
1908) as commissioner from New Jersey.
1903 - ABA makes first appropriation in
support of work of Conference. James Barr Ames of Harvard Law School
commissioned to draft the Uniform Partnership Act.
1905 - Samuel W. Pennypacker, Pennsylvania
Governor, invites other governors to send delegation to a national
divorce conference--meets twice in 1906; three acts endorsed.
1906 - First roll call by states as Uniform
Warehouse Receipts Act is approved. Legal scholar Roscoe Pound serves
for one year as a commissioner from Nebraska.
1907 - Uniform Desertion Act and Non-Support
Act and Uniform Marriage Act authorized. Act Regulating Annulment of
Marriage of Divorce adopted. Also, Act Providing for the Return of
Marriage Statistics, Act Providing for the Return of Divorce Statistics.
1908 - Work begins on Uniform Corporation Act.
1910 - Twenty uniform acts approved in decade
of the teens. The Uniform Partnership Act, begun in 1906, was completed
by William Draper Lewis, Dean of the University of Pennsylvania Law
1911 - Uniform Marriage and Marriage License
Act and Uniform Child Labor Act approved.
1912 - Uniform Marriage Evasion Act adopted.
Woodrow Wilson, commissioner from New Jersey from 1901 to 1908 elected
U.S. President in a landslide.
1914 - Uniform Partnership Act completed. Will
be adopted by all the states. Also Foreign Acknowledgement Act, Cold
Storage Act, Workmens's Compensation Act.
1915 - Name changed to National Conference of
Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Constitution and by-laws completely
revised. Each act now must be considered section by section during at
least two annual meetings.
1916 - Uniform Limited Partnership Act as well
as Extradition of Persons of Unsound Minds Act approved, also Land
1917 - Uniform Flag Act approved.
1918 - Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act
1920 - Certain Acts withdrawn; others declared
obsolete. After pruning, 26 acts remain as recommended for passage in
1930 - During the 30s, Conference adopts 31
1935 - Conference entered into agreement with
American Law Institute for cooperative drafting of acts in area of
1936 - After revisions, withdrawals and acts
declared obsolete, 53 uniform acts remained as recommended for approval.
On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the
standing precedents of the prior 150 years concerning "COMMON
LAW" in the federal government.
"THERE IS NO FEDERAL
COMMON LAW, AND CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF
COMMON LAW applicable IN A STATE, WHETHER
they be LOCAL or GENERAL
in their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW
or a part of LAW OF TORTS." (See: ERIE
RAILROAD CO. vs. THOMPKINS, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L. Ed. 1188)
The Common Law is the
fountain source of Substantive and Remedial Rights, if not our very
Liberties. The members and associates of the Bar thereafter formed
committees, granted themselves special privileges, immunities and
franchises, and held meetings concerning the Judicial procedures,
and further, to amend laws "to conform to a trend of judicial
decisions or to accomplish similar objectives", including
hodgepodging the jurisdictions of Law and Equity together, which is
known today as "One Form of Action." [See: Constitution
and By Laws, Article 3, Section 3.3(c), 1990-91 Reference Book, see
also Colorado Methods of Practice, West Publishing, Vol. 4, pages
2-3, Authors Comments.]
1939 - ABA gets more involved in approval of
uniform law products. Thirty-nine acts are presented to the Board of
Governors of the ABA for consideration and approval. During the same
year, all acts on aeronautics and motor vehicles are eliminated as well
as the Land Registration Act, Child Labor Act of 1930, Uniform Divorce
Jurisdiction Act, Firearms Act, Marriage Act and more. Six acts are
reclassified as Model acts.
1940 - At start of decade, after deletions,
etc., 53 acts out of 93 which had been approved since the group's
founding remain on the books. Drafting committee for the Uniform
Commercial Code (UCC) approved.
1941 - Speaking of the Commercial Code
project, the Conference president states: "....this is the most
important and the most far reaching project on which the conference has
ever embarked." It would take the major part of the next 10 tear
period to complete.
1942 - UCC effort begins in earnest with
completion of work on the revised Uniform Sales Act.
1943 - Members of the conference participate
in drafting committee in Washington, D.C. to work on legislation which
the government might desire in connection with the war effort. No new
1944 - Conference receives $150,000 grant from
the Falk Foundation of Pittsburgh to support work on the UCC.
1945 - No annual meeting for the first time
due to difficulties of civilian transport during the war.
1946 - Falk Foundation increases its support
of the UCC with an additional $100,000.
1947 - Uniform Law Conference (ULC) and
American Law Institute join in partnership to put all the components
together for the UCC. Uniform Divorce Recognition Act approved.
1950 - Approval of the Uniform Marriage
License Application Act, Uniform Adoption Act and the Uniform Reciprocal
Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). The latter has been one of the most
successful ULC products.
1951 - On May 18, during a joint meeting with
the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C., the UCC was approved.
Later that year the ABA formally approved the code as well. Considered
the outstanding accomplishment of the Conference, the Code remains the
ULC's signature product.
One of the Uniform Laws drafted by the National
Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the American Law
Institute governing commercial transactions (including sales and leasing
of goods, transfer of funds, commercial paper, bank deposits and
collections, letters of credit, bulk transfers, warehouse receipts,
bills of lading, investment securities, and secured transactions), The
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), has been adopted in whole or
substantially by all states. (See: Blacks Law, 6th Ed. pg. 1531) In
essence, all court decisions are based on commercial law or business law
and has criminal penalties associated with it. Rather than openly
calling this new law Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction, it is called
America as a bankrupt nation is
owned completely by its creditors.
The creditors own the Congress, they own the
Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the State
governments. Do you have a Birth Certificate? They own you too.
1952 - Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure
approved---first venture of the Conference into this area of the law.
1953 - Pennsylvania the first state to enact
the UCC. Uniform Rules of Evidence adopted.
1954 - Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act
1956 - Gift to Minors Act approved. Will be
adopted in every state. For the first time, ULC enters the field of
1957 - Massachusetts becomes second state to
enact the UCC, after revisions by the Editorial Board.
1958 - Uniform Securities Act approved.
1960 - Uniform Paternity Act passed. by 1960,
UCC enacted in Kentucky, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.
1961 - Permanent Editorial Board on the UCC
formed---8 more states pass UCC. Constitution amended to provide that
all members of Conference must be members of the bar.
1962 - Four more states adopt UCC, including
New York. Probate Code project approved.
1963 - Third comprehensive law project
approved, on retail installment sales, consumer credit, small loans and
usury. Eleven more UCC states. William H. Renquist begins term as
commissioner from Arizona; serves until 1968.
1964 - Special Committee of Uniform Divorce
and Marriage laws recommends that a study of divorce law be authorized
and that funds be sought. One more UCC state.
1965 - Divorce and Marriage Law committee
instructed to commence drafting if funds can be obtained for the
project. Thirteen more UCC states.
1966 - Five more UCC states.
1968 - Much of annual meeting devoted to the
Uniform Consumer Credit Code and the Uniform Probate Code ---two
projects nearing completion. By 1968, 49 states, the District of
Columbia and U.S. Virgin Islands have enacted the UCC---only exception
being Louisiana. A big year. Other developments in 1968: the Consumer
Credit Code is approved as well as revisions to the Anatomical Gift Act,
Child Custody Jurisdiction Act and revisions to URESA.
1969 - Probate Code approved. Preliminary
analysis of the uniform marriage and divorce legislation distributed.
1970 - Controlled Substances Act and Uniform
Marriage and Divorce Act approved.
1971 - Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Act
1972 - Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant
Act, Disposition of Community Property Rights At Death Act and UMVARA,
the Uniform Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act approved.
1973 - Uniform Parentage Act supersedes
Paternity Act. Uniform Crime Victims Reparations Act approved.
1974 - Conference approves Rules of Criminal
Procedure and Eminent Domain Code. Louisiana, the only state not to
adopt the Uniform Commercial Code due to difficulties in reconciling its
provisions with those of the Civil Code, adopts Articles 1,3,4,5,7, and
1975 - Uniform Land Transactions Act approved.
1976 - Major revision of the Uniform
Partnership Act approved; also Uniform Simplification of Land Transfers
and Uniform Class Action Acts.
1978 - Uniform Brain Death and Uniform Federal
Lien Registration Act approved.
1979 - Uniform Trade Secrets and Durable Power
of Attorney acts among those approved.
1980 - Determination of Death Act supersedes
1978 Brain Death Act. Uniform Planned Community Act, Model Real Estate
Time-Share Act and Model Periodic Payment of Judgments Act also adopted.
1981 - Two important updated acts approved:
new Model State Administration Procedure and Unclaimed Property Acts.
Also two new acts: the Model Real Estate Cooperative Act and the Uniform
Conservation Easement Act.
1982 - Uniform Condominium and Planned
Community Acts and Model Real Estate Cooperative Act combined into the
Uniform Common Interest Ownership act.
The enumerated, specified, and distinct Jurisdictions
established by the ordained Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2,
and under the Bill of Rights (1791), Amendment VII, were further
hodgepodged and fundamentally changed in 1982 to include Admiralty
Jurisdiction, which was once again brought inland. This was the
FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL and
ADMIRALTY PROCEDURE. Just as 1938 Rules ABOLISHED THE DISTINCTION
between Actions At Law and Suits in Equity, this CHANGE WOULD ABOLISH
THE DISTINCTION between CIVIL ACTIONS and SUITS IN ADMIRALTY."
(See: Federal Rules of Procedure, 1982 Ed., pg. 17. Also see Federalist
Papers, No. 83, Declaration Of Resolves Of The First Continental
Congress, Oct. 14th, 1774, Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of
Taking Up Arms, July 16, 1775, Declaration Of Independence,
July 4, 1776, Bennet vs. Butterworth, 52 U.S. 669)
1983 - Uniform Marital Property Act and
Uniform Premarital agreement Act approved. Uniform Transfers to Minors
Act replaces the uniformly enacted Uniform Gifts to Minors Act.
1984 - Uniform Statutory Will Act approved;
new Uniform fraudulent Transfer Act supersedes Fraudulent Conveyance Act
1985 - Uniform Health-Care Information Act,
Uniform Land Security Interest act, Uniform Personal Property Leasing
Act and Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act approved.
1986 - New drafting effort to revise Articles
3 and 4 of the UCC and draft new provisions begins.
1987 - Approval of the revised Uniform
Anatomical Gift Act approved as well as new Uniform Custodial Trust Act,
Uniform Construction Lien Act and Uniform Franchise and Business
Opportunities Act. Also revision of Rules of Criminal Procedure.
1988 - Final approval of amendments to the
Uniform Securities Act and amendments to Article 6 of the UCC dealing
with bulk sales. Conference also approves Uniform Statutory Form Power
of Attorney Act and Uniform Punitive and Unknown Fathers Act and takes
on the controversial issue of surrogate mother contracts with Uniform
Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
1989 - Article 4A of the UCC, dealing with
electronic funds transfers, approved. Also approved: amendments to the
Rights of the Terminally Ill Act, authorizing withdrawal of life support
by a surrogate decision maker; the Uniform Pretrial Detention Act,
confining violent criminals before trial; the Uniform Non-probate
Transfers on Death Act and amendments to Article VI of the Uniform
1990 - Major revision of 1970 Uniform
Controlled Substances Act-- the law in 46 jurisdictions-- approved.
Substantial revision of UCC Article 3 also approved, as well as an
updated Article II of the Uniform Probate Code, to keep pace with
current thinking on marital property.
This private corruption of the law has occurred
despite the Constitutional responsibility conferred on Congress by
Article I, Section 8 of the Federal Constitution which states that it is
Congress that "makes all Laws."
What does that have to do with anything? Uniform Laws seem
to be a good Idea.
Well now, that is a good question. Let us continue.....
An Expose On The Legal Fraud Perpetrated
On All Americans
THE COURTS RECOGNIZE ONLY TWO CLASSES OF PEOPLE IN
THE UNITED STATES TODAY: DEBTORS AND CREDITORS
The concept of DEBTORS and CREDITORS is very
important to understand.
Every legal action where you are brought before the
court: e.g. traffic ticket, property dispute or permits, income tax,
credit cards, bank loans or anything else government might dream up to
charge you where you find yourself in front of a court. It is an equity
court, administrating commercial law having a debtor-creditor law as the
controlling law. Today, we have an equity court but not an equity court
as defined by the Constitution of the United States or any other legal
documents before 1938.
All the courts of this once great land have been
changed starting with the Supreme Court decision of 1938 in ERIE V.
THOMPKINS. I'll give you background which led to this decision. There
is a terrible FRAUD being perpetrated on all Americans. Please
understand that this fraud is a 24 hour, 7 days a week, year after year
continuous fraud. This fraud is constantly upon you all your life. It
doesn't just happen once in a while. This fraud is perpetually and
incessantly upon you and your family.
U.S. INC. GOES TO GENEVA 1930's
In order for you to understand just how this fraud
works, you need to know the history of its inception.
It goes like this: From 1928 -1932 there were five
years of Geneva conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva
Switzerland for 5 continuous years in order to set up what would be the
policy of all the participating countries. During the year of 1930 the
U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal etc. all
declared bankruptcy. If you try to look up the 1930 minutes, you will
not find them because they don't publish this particular volume. If you
try to find the 1930 volume which contains the minutes of what happened,
you will probably not find it. This volume has been pulled out of
circulation or is hidden in the library and is very hard to find. This
volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.
Going into 1932, they stopped meeting in Geneva. In
1932 Franklin Roosevelt came into power as President of the United
States. Roosevelt's job was to put into place and administer the
bankruptcy that had been declared two years earlier. The corporate
government needed a key Supreme Court decision. The corporate United
States government had to have a legal case on the books to set the stage
for recognizing, implementing and supporting the bankruptcy. Now. this
doesn't mean the bankruptcy wasn't implemented before 1938 with the Erie
vs. Thompkins decision. The bankruptcy started in 1930-1931. The
bankruptcy definitely started when Roosevelt came into office. He was
sworn in during the month of January 1933. He started right away in the
bankruptcy with what is known as 'The Banking Holiday," and
proceeded in pulling the gold coin out of circulation. That was the
beginning of the corporate United States Public Policy for bankruptcy..
Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 & Executive Order 6260 "Trading
With The Enemy Act."
ROOSEVELT STACKS SUPREME COURT
It is a known historical fact that during 1933 and
1937 - 1938, there was a big fight between Roosevelt and the Supreme
Court Justices. Roosevelt tried to stack the Supreme court with a bunch
of his pals. Roosevelt tried to enlarge the number of justices and he
tried to change the slant of the justices. The corporate United States
had to have one Supreme Court case which would support their bankruptcy
There was resistance to Roosevelt's court stacking
efforts. Some of the justices tried to warn us that Roosevelt was
tampering with the law and with the courts. Roosevelt was trying to see
to it that prior decisions of the court were overturned. He was trying
to bring in a new order, a new procedure for the law of the land.
THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES GOES BANKRUPT
A bankruptcy case was needed on the books to
legitimize the fact that the corporate U.S. had already declared
bankruptcy! This bankruptcy was effectuated by compact that the
corporate several states had with the corporate government (Corporate
Capitol of the several corporate states). This compact tied the
corporate several states to corporate Washington D.C, (the headquarters
of the corporation called "The United
Since the United States Corporation, having
established its headquarters within the District of Columbia, declared
itself to be in the state of bankruptcy, it automatically declared
bankruptcy for all its subsidiaries who were effectively connected
corporate members (who happened to be the corporate state governments of
the Union). The corporate state governments didn't have to vote on the
bankruptcy. The bankruptcy automatically became effective by reason of
the Compact/Agreement between each of the corporate state governments
and THE MOTHER CORPORATION. (Note: the
liberty of using the term "Mother
Corporation" to communicate the interconnected power of the
corporate Federal government relative to her associated corporate States
has been taken.
It is Historical knowledge that the original Union
States created the Federal Government, however, for all practical
purposes, the Federal government has taken control of her "Creators",
the States.) She has become a beast out of control for power. She has
for her trade names the following: "United
States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.",
"United States of America",
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Feds. and Federal Government. She
has her own U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Parks, Post Office etc.
etc. etc. Because she is claiming to be bankrupt, she freely gives her
land, her personnel, and the money she steals from the Americans via the
IRS. and her state corporations, to the United Nations and the
International Bankers as payment for her debt. The UN and the
International Bankers use this money and services for various world wide
projects, including war.
War is an extremely lucrative business for the
bankers of the New World Order. Loans for destruction. Loans for
re-construction. Loans for controlling people in her new world order.
THE U.S. INC. DECLARES BANKRUPTCY
The corporate U.S. then, is the head corporate
member, who met at Geneva to decide for all its corporate body members.
The corporate representatives of the corporate several states were in
attendance. If the states had their own power to declare bankruptcy
regardless of whether Washington D.C. declared bankruptcy or not, then
the several states would have been represented at Geneva. The several
states of America were not represented. Consequently, whatever
Washington D.C. agreed to at Geneva was passed on automatically, via
compact to the several corporate states as a group, association,
corporation or as a club member; they all agreed and declared bankruptcy
as one government corporate group in 1930. The several states only
needed a representative at Geneva by way of the U.S. in Washington D.C.
The delegates of the corporate United States attended the meetings and
spoke for the several corporate states as well as for the Federal
Corporate Government. And, presto, BANKRUPTCY
was declared for all!
From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law
or decide any case that would go against the Federal Government. The
case had to come down from the Federal level so that the states could
then rely on the Federal decision and use this decision within the
states as justification for the bankruptcy process within the states.
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE EMERGES AS LAW OF
THE LAND Ah, Ha, are you
beginning to get the picture?
By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true
bankruptcy case they had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had
been declared back in 1930 could be upheld and administered. That's why
the Supreme Court had to be stacked and made corrupt from within. The
new players on the Supreme Court fully understood that they had to
destroy all other case law that had been established prior to 1938. The
Federal Government had to have a case to destroy all precedent, all
appearance, and even the statute of law itself. That is, the Statutes at
large had to be perverted. They finally got their case in Erie vs.
Thompkins. It was right after that case that the American Law Institute
and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws
listed right in the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating
the Uniform Commercial Code that is on our backs today. Let us quote
directly from the preface of the Official Text of the Uniform Commercial
Code 12th Edition:
"The Code was originally
approved by its sponsors and the American Bar Association in 1952, and
was revised in 1958 to incorporate a number of changes that had been
recommended by the New York Law Revision Commission and other agencies.
Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable in light of experience
under the Code were approved by the Permanent Editorial Board in 1962
The above named groups and associations of private
lawyers got together and started working on the Uniform Commercial Code
(UCC). It was somewhere between 1938 and 1940, I don't recall, but by
the early 40's and during the war, this committee was working to form
the UCC and getting it ready to go on the market. The UCC is the Law
Merchant's code for the administration of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now
the law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. This Legal
Committee of lawyers put everything: Negotiable Instruments, Security,
Sales, Contracts, and the whole mess under the UCC. That's where the "Uniform"
word comes from. It means it was uniform from state to state as well as
being uniform with the District of Columbia.
It doesn't mean you didn't have the uniform
instrument laws on the books before this time. It means the laws were
not uniform from state to state. By the middle 1960's, every state had
passed the UCC into law. The states had no choice but to adopt newly
formed Uniform Commercial Code as the Law of the Land. The states fully
understood they had to administrate Bankruptcy. Washington D.C. adopted
the Uniform Commercial Code in 1963, just six
weeks after President John F. Kennedy was killed.
YOUR LAWYER'S SECRET OATH???
What was the effect and the significance of Erie vs.
Thompkins case decision of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie
Decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1938. There
can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. The lawyers, who are
members of the American Bar Association, were and are currently under
and controlled by the Lawyer's guild of Great Britain, created, formed,
and implemented the new bankruptcy law. The American Bar Association is
a franchise of the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain.
Since the Erie vs. Thompkins case was decided, the
practice of law in this country was never again to be the same. It has
been reported, that every lawyer in existence, and every lawyer coming
up has to take a "secret" oath to
support bankruptcy. As Officers of the Court they have sworn to uphold
the law as it exists, and as they have been taught. In so doing, not
only do the lawyers promise to support the bankruptcy, but the lawyers
and judges promise never to reveal who the true creditor/party is in the
bankruptcy proceedings (if, indeed, many of them are even aware or
know). In court, there is never identification and appearance of the
true character and principle of the proceedings. If there is no
appearance of the true party to the action, then there is no way the
defendant is able to know the TRUE NATURE AND
CAUSE OF THE ACTION. You are never told the true NATURE
AND CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The court is
forbidden to tell you that information.
That's why, if you question the true nature and
cause, the judge will tell you "It's not my
job to tell you. You are not retaining me as an attorney and I can't
give you legal advice from the bench. I suggest you hire a lawyer."
HIRE A LAWYER?
The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer who is
pledged not to reveal the true nature and the cause, how will you ever
find out the nature and the cause? YOU WON'T! If the true nature and the
cause of the action against you is revealed, it will expose the real
creditor from whom this action and cause came. In other words, they will
have to name the TRUE creditor. The true creditor will have to state the
nature and the cause. The true creditor will have to say "It's
a bankruptcy proceeding." The true creditor will have to
say, "I'm the creditor and he's the
That declaration would open the door for you to
question "Who the hell are you? How did you
get attached to my back and by what vehicle did I promise to become a
debtor to you?" In this country, the courts on every level,
from the justice of the peace level all the way up...... even into the
International law arena, (called the World Court), are administrating
the bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true creditors
really are and how you personally became pledged as a party or
participant to the corporate United States debt. What would really kill
these people off, would be to compel the International Bankers to send a
lawyer into the courtroom and present himself as the attorney for THE
TRUE CREDITOR, THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. THEN, HAVE THE ATTORNEY PUT
INTO THE RECORD THE TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE PROCEEDING AGAINST YOU
ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY.
The International Bankers told these various
countries that they were now in a state of bankruptcy. The countries had
been taken over by the creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but
for all these participating countries to declare bankruptcy. If they
didn't agree to declare bankruptcy, the bankers threatened to collapse
the economies and thereby put the countries back into the depression
like the one from which they were just emerging. The bankers made an
offer they couldn't refuse. To review and elaborate: In 1930 there was a
world wide depression.
The Bankers said, "Look.
You can do it either of two ways. The easy way or the hard way."
"You just accept the bankruptcy and we'll let
you out of the depression. If you don't, you're on your own."
So all the countries involved agreed, because they realized that the
International bankers had them by the throat. The countries therefore
agreed that over a period of several years that they would pass statutes
and legislation for the implementation of the bankruptcy in favor of the
Now, it would probably be correct to say that the key
bankers were the Rothschild's and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by
way of the Federal Reserve Bank. Who the bankers were is immaterial. The
fact remains that there was an International bankruptcy, and an
International conspiracy to cover it up. There was a banking creditor
who made the offer; the countries accepted the offer in order to enable
the representative countries to continue without revolution and to allow
the politicians to remain comfortably in place. Under a delusion of
solvency the countries were allowed to continue to operate as though
they were solvent; while in fact, the representative countries were
The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and
diabolical plan. How did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area
of real estate? The bankers did it with real estate, the same way they
did it in the area of Federal Income Taxes. These Foreign bankers simply
and deceptively devised ways and means to con you into declaring
yourself as a "CITIZEN" or a "RESIDENT"
of the corporate U.S. Remember the corporate United States is Bankrupt
per agreement and public policy. After you have been tricked into
claiming you are one of their corporate United States Citizens, you are
given a social security number which ties you to certain meager "benefits"
and "privileges."Then, the
bankers con your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con
you into filling out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040
These slick paper agreements establish your "voluntary"
indebtedness to the banker creditor. If at any time you decide to balk
at this scheme because you don't like it, the real creditor never has to
make an appearance in court to list the true nature and cause of the
action which is being brought against you. You end up dealing with an
agency. The agency can conveniently grant itself immunity from
prosecution because all it is doing (without your knowledge, of course)
is administrating the bankruptcy to which the government agreed to per
the Geneva meetings.
The court system never lets you put the original
creditor on the courtroom stand, so you can ask him how he got attached
to your back. The system is set up in such a way that the true creditor
is protected and never has to make an appearance and never has to answer
any of your questions or produce documents. Therefore, the true creditor
never has to produce the law that gives him the right to pledge you
(your body and labor) into indebtedness (bondage/servitude).
Why? Because the Geneva agreement in 1930 was done by
treaty. The bankruptcy was not done by legislation. The agreement came
first; signed in secrecy, THEN Congress began to pass legislation to
fulfill the bankruptcy obligation required by the treaty. Legislation
being passed by Congress was henceforth and is thereby bankruptcy
legislation. When cases came before the courts, the courts could make
decisions based on the new controlling law of bankruptcy. It had nothing
to do with Constitutional rights. Now, any case brought in is under the
new bankruptcy law and is not considered as a true constitutional case.
It is now a bankrupty case as distinct from, but cleverly disguised as a
The members of the Supreme Court, of course, realized
what was happening to them and the system of law. The court was being
asked to perform in a creditor, debtor bankrupt proceeding to the
benefit of the banker creditors. The members of the Supreme Court said, "NO.
We will not give you a bankrupt proceeding decision that you can then
enforce against everybody; a decision not only effecting corporate
Washington D.C. but also having effect within the corporate state
This, by the way, is fraud. It wouldn't be fraud if
the government of corporate Washington D.C. and the government of the
several corporate states declared bankruptcy then let the people know
about the bankruptcy. (Notice: when I say corporate "government"
I don't mean you and me. You and I are not the corporate government. The
corporate government is the corporate capital of the corporate state.
The government is a neutral government zone known as the corporate
capital of the corporate state. The government is where the corporate
state is. It is corporate headquarters. Just like corporate Washington
D.C. is the seat of the corporate Federal Government. The capital of the
corporate state is the seat of the corporate state government. If the
corporate Federal Government and her subsidiary corporate state
governments want to join forces and declare bankruptcy that's not fraud.
This is their corporate business.
However, it is fraud when those two corporate
entities declare bankruptcy but do not disclose to you, me, and every
other American, that they have so declared bankruptcy.
Further they have not and do not disclose that their
intention is to get you and every other American in this country to
pledge to pay off their corporate debt to their corporate creditors. The
corporate bankruptcy is the corporate state and federal responsibility,
not the responsibility of Americans, The People.
U.S. INC. IS DISTINCT AND SEPARATE FROM
"We the People"
who created and signed the contract/compact/agreement/charter of, by,
and for the Constitutional Corporation (U.S.) using the trade name of
the "United States of America,"
is a corporate entity (legal fiction) which is DISTINCT AND SEPARATE
from Americans or the unenfranchised people of America. The private
natural American people did not create the corporation of the United
States. The United States Inc. did not create the private natural
American people. America and Americans were in existence prior to the
creation of the United States Corporation. The United States Corporation
has located its U.S. headquarters in Washington D.C.
Virginia State (state territory) gave land to the
newly formed United States Corporation. Notice here, we have a state
giving something of value (land) to the United States. The United Stales
Corporation agreed in the Constitutional contract, to protect the
States. Instead, because of their bankruptcy (Corporate U.S. Bankruptcy)
this particular U.S. corporation has enslaved the States and the people
by deception and at the will of their foreign bankers with whom they
have been doing business. Our forefathers gave their lives and property
to prevent enslavement.
Today, we are again enslaved. Private natural
American people have been tricked, deceived, and set-up to carry the
U.S. Inc. perpetual corporate debt under bankruptcy laws. Every time
Americans appear in court, the corporate U.S. bankruptcy is being
administrated against them without their knowledge and lawful consent.
That is FRAUD.
All corporate bankruptcy administration is done by "Public
Policy" of by and for the Mother Corporation (U.S. Inc.).
THE MOTHER CORPORATION'S "PUBLIC
The corporate bankruptcy is carried out under the
corporate public policy of the corporate Federal Government in corporate
Washington D.C. The states use state public policy to carry out Federal
public policy of Washington D.C. Public policy and only public policy is
being administered against you in the corporate courts today. The public
policy that is dictated by all the courts, from the smallest to the most
powerful courts in the world, is public policy. This is why I said, in
another tape that the Russian people would be enslaved into
indebtedness. What will happen is that it will become public policy in
Russia to have the people go into joint corporate debt. The Russians
will be forced to promise to pay those debts. They will be forced to pay
off on those corporate debts. Corporate public policy is the crux of the
whole bankruptcy implementation. Corporate public policy is forever a
Corporate public policy and the laws that have passed since 1938 are all
corporate public policy laws dealing only with corporate public policy.
Understand that U.S. corporate public policy is not an American public
policy. The public policy is OF, ( belonging to) the United States
corporation. This U.S. corporate bankruptcy public policy is not OF
(belonging to) America, the Republic.
The Erie vs. Thompkins 1938 case was a decision based
upon public policy. All decisions at any level since 1938, have been
public policy decisions. All statutes, rules, regulations, and
procedures that have been passed, whether civil or criminal, whether it
is Federal or State, have all been passed to implement the public policy
of bankruptcy. Since 1933, when FDR came into office, he brought in
public policy. He established that it was the public policy of the
overnment to call in all the gold. It was the public policy of the
government to declare a banking holiday. It was the public policy of the
Government in Washington D.C., (the Federal Government) to give out
government assistance. Public policy operates the same within the
states. All Federal court decisions can only be handed down if the
states support Federal public policy. The state legal system must be
compatible with the Federal legal system.
This is why, when people like us go to court without
being represented by a lawyer, we throw a monkey-wrench into their
corporate administrative proceedings. Why? Because all public policy
corporate lawyers are pledged to up-hold public policy, which is the
corporate U.S. administration of their corporate bankruptcy. That's why
you'll find stamped on many if not all our briefs, "THIS
CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED IN ANY OTHER CASE AND IS NOT TO BE REPORTED IN
ANY COURTS." The reason for this notation is that when we go
in to defend ourselves or file a claim we are not supporting the
corporate bankruptcy administration and procedure. The arguments we put
forth predate 1938.
We come in with Constitutional law etc. All these
early cases support our rights not to be in bankruptcy. However, the
corporate court, lawyers, and judges have promised to give no judicial
recognition of any case before 1938.
THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS'
Before 1938, the law was not a public policy law. All
these old cases were not public law deciding cases. Today, the cases are
all decided under corporate public policy. The public policy exists in
order to administer the bankruptcy for the benefit of the banker
creditors and to protect the banker creditor.
Corporate public policy can allow the creditor to say
to the corporate legislatures, "I want a law
passed requiring my debtors to wear seat belts. Why? Because I want to
be able to milk my debtors for the longest period possible."
It doesn't behoove the creditor to allow all of his
labor producing debtors die at an average age 30 years. What would
happen to the bankers' lending, interest, penalties, increase, repayment
etc., on the entire funding and lending process if the average American
life span was only 30 years? Why, the bankers would have to have 2 1/2
times the current consumer population to equal their current take. The
bankers would need (instead of 250 million Americans) 600 million or
even more. Maybe the bankers would need 2 Billion Americans because the
individual can't contract for debt until he/she is 18 or 21 years of
age. Therefore, if the average life span is only a 30 year period, the
creditor could collect on the debt for only 12 years.
Now, if the bankers can just get people to live an
average of 70 years) you are talking a whopping 50 years of indebtedness
for which they contract and for which they are forced to pay back with
usury/interest. With this situation, the banker creditor can now float
loans worth 50 years of potential indebtedness and its payoff with
interest in the name of the people, as opposed to 9 to 12 years.
The creditors and their property and their people are
well taken care of. The creditor doesn't want the population to decrease
per se, unless, it is convenient for the debtor to run up debts in
another's name and then liquidate that debtor or that group of debtor
people. For example let's consider the AIDS problem today among the
black people. What better group to inject AIDS into than the black
Read the Strecker Memorandum on AIDS and the World
Health Organization connection. This documents their tainted vaccination
program in Africa and elsewhere. Why not kill them off? Don't you
understand that the blacks as a whole have absorbed all the debt that
they can? The blacks have reached the maximum of the debt that they can
carry. In fact, they have gone over their limit to pay back. They are
now heavily into welfare, public housing, medicaid, medicare, food
stamps etc.. Now, the situation is that instead of paying off the
creditor, they have become a drain on the creditor. The creditor must
now pay them to live and take care of them. What creditor in his right
mind wants to spend money on a bunch of people from whom he can't
collect any revenue?
The corporate public policy of the corporate United
States and the states and the county and of the cities are that YOU must
take care of these people. You must provide them with welfare etc. Why?
Because when you, as a member of the corporate body politic allow laws
to be passed which says the minorities must be taken care of, then the
corporate legislature can say the public policy is that the people want
these people taken care of. Therefore, when given the chance, the
legislature can say the public policy is that the people want these
blacks and poor whites to be taken care of and given a chance,
therefore, we must raise taxes to fund all these benefits, privileges
This is what these people need to make them socially,
politically, and economically equal with everyone else. The legislatures
have passed all kinds of statutes providing for huge indebtedness and
they float the indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone
into court to challenge them by telling them it is not your public
policy to assume the debts of other people. On the contrary, all the
court decisions coming put, indicate it is the corporate public policy
and it is your willingness to support the corporate public policy to pay
off these debts.
means of and for the corporate Government. It does not mean of and for
private people. "Public" means
corporate government. It is corporate government policy. When they talk
about public debt, they are talking about corporate
government debt and your presumed pledge against this corporate
THE REAL ESTATE SNARE
How do they work this scheme in the area of real
estate? These banker creeps have made an agreement that it is corporate
public policy, that all land (property) be pledged to the creditor to
satisfy the debt of the bankruptcy, which the creditor claims under
bankruptcy. They get away with this the same way they get away with any
other case that is brought before the court, whether it is a traffic
ticket, IRS, or whatever.
Here is how it works. You have signed instruments
giving information and jurisdiction to the bankers through their agents.
The instruments (forms) you signed include, but are not limited to the
following: social security registration, use of the social security
number, IRS forms, driver license, traffic citation, jury duty, voter
registration, using their address, zip code, U.S. postal service, a
deed, a mortgage application, etc. etc. The bankers then use that
instrument (document) under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as a
contract/agreement. These documents are considered promissory contract
where you promise to perform. This scheme involves you, without you ever
becoming directly in contact or in contract with the true creditor.
What's more, you are never informed as to whom that true creditor is and
it is never divulged to you the true nature and the true cause of the
paperwork that you are filling out.
If you will examine your real estate deed, you will
find that you promised to pay taxes to the corporate government. On
property you originally acquired through a mortgage, you will notice
that the bank never promised to pay taxes. You did. The corporate
government at all levels never promised to pay taxes to the creditor.
In tax and collection problems relating to real
estate being enforced against you, you will notice that there is no
mention in the mortgage or the deed stating the true nature and cause of
the action. Since you have made the promise to perform, you get a bill
every year for property taxes. You don't realize that the only way they
can bill you for taxes is through your own stupidity of agreeing to pay
the tax. You volunteered. They took advantage of you, conning you to
promise to pay properly taxes. When they send you their bill, they are
coming against you for the collection of the promise you made to the
Now the creditor on the paperwork appears that it is
the local bank. The bank has loaned you credit. The bank hasn't loaned
you anything. It is not their credit to loan. This is why the bank can't
loan credit. There is a credit involved, but not the bank's credit. It
is the credit of the International Bankers. The International bankers
are making you the loan based upon their operation of bankruptcy claim
which they presume to have against you personally as well as your
property. Now, let's say you get a tax bill and you decide "I'm
not going to pay it." You will find that the courts and the
lawyers and the county agencies are set up to protect the true creditor
simply by not identifying the creditor. By not being identified as the
true creditor, the international banker can make you a credit loan that
has no value in reality.
In the case of real property, he claims to loan you
the use of your own property for which you pay a tax as rent. He is
allowed to do this because you are presumed by statutory law and the
banker to be in bankruptcy. This fraud is not revealed because he does
not have to make an appearance in court to present and defend his claim.
His name is not mentioned in the case.
Let's say you are not aware of your remedies provided
for you within the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides or
allows you to dishonor the county's presentment of the tax bill. You
don't pay your tax bill. You, therefore, just sit on it and don't do or
say anything. A couple of years go by and all of a sudden you are being
sent letters to pay up what is owed or else in a certain period of time,
your property will be taken from you and put up for tax sale.
Now here is what is interesting........ If you don't
pay your tax bill and they contact you asking you to pay it and you
don't do it, they will declare that you are in default. It is based on
that default, as provided for in the UCC, that they sell your property
for the tax (rent).
However, the county never goes into court to put into
the record the identification of the real creditor. And the county does
not state the true nature and cause of the action against you
(bankruptcy action disguised as a tax action). Why? Because, under
bankruptcy implementation, they have developed a legal procedure which
is based upon your promise to pay. This procedure provides that they
don't have to come to the court to get a court order authorizing the
sale of your property. Therefore, the real creditor never makes an
appearance in court.
The reality is, you are denied any possibility of
appearing in court to exercise your right to challenge the creditor. To
ask if he became the creditor under "public
policy." To ask if it is under "public
policy", just what is the "public
policy?" And how did you (as an international banker) become
"creditor" to me and everyone
else in this country (American people). They don't want you to ask the
real creditor (the International Bankers), to produce the documents upon
which your personal debt is established. If they were forced to go into
court, they would have to produce the deed or mortgage showing you
knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily promised to pay the corporate
public debt. You did not knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily promise
to pay any U.S. Corporate Bankruptcy obligation made in the 1930's.
This would, of course, expose their racket. The fact
is, that, there was absolutely no debt connected to you until you agreed
to it through their deception and fraud. The deception in a broader
sense, permeates the education system and the news media, etc., to sell
you on the idea that you are a statutory "U.S.
citizen" and "resident of the
United States." (INCORPORATED).
YOUR SIGNATURE IS YOUR MOST VALUABLE
Your property is pledged for the rest of your life
upon your signature and your promise to perform is pledged into
perpetual debt. The bankers don't even bother to go to court They leave
it up to the agencies to administer the agency corporate public policy.
It is the public policy of that agency to bill you on your promise to
perform. If you don't pay, they follow up on the public policy on notice
of default and give you one more chance to pay. Then they proceed to
sell the property at a tax auction. They never go to court or appear in
court to back up their claim against you. Did any of your government
licensed and controlled teachers ever stress that your signature is your
most valuable personal property? Did your government teachers ever tell
you that any time you sign any document, you should sign it "without
prejudice," or with "All Rights
Reserved" above your signature. This means you are reserving
your God given unalienable rights which cannot be transferred and all
other rights for which your forefathers died.
The Corporate U.S.. Government provides, or at best
pretends to provide for this reservation of rights under the Uniform
Commercial Code (UCC) 1-207 and 1-103. You need more information in this
area. It is not in the best interest of the United States Corporate "PUBLIC"
schools to teach you about their bankruptcy proceedings and how they
have set the snare to Compel you into paying their debt. The Corporate "PUBLIC"
schools are strictly designed for their Corporate citizen/subjects. That
is. the Corporate U.S.. Public School citizens.
Notice all the emphases on being a "good"
Citizen. Basically all their teachers and their students are trained to
produce labor and material in exchange for valueless green paper called "money."
It is not money, it functions "AS"
money. Lawful money must be backed by something of value. Bankers take
your labor, services, and material (homes, cars, farms, etc.) in
exchange for their valueless corporate paper. This paper is backed only
by the "full faith and Confidence of the
United States Government" THE MOTHER CORPORATION.
I do not have faith or confidence in the U.S.
BANKRUPT CORPORATE GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATORS WHO HAVE PERVERTED THEIR
Constitutional CHARTER, enslaving the sovereign American people into
their bankruptcy obligations. Their fraudulent money laundering process
promotes your payment on the corporate government's bankruptcy debt.
This debt is mathematically impossible to pay Off. You and your family
are in continual financial bondage to the international bankers. They
love it so!
Black's Law Dictionary 1990, defines "Money
Changers" as: .....business of a banker... today handled by
the international departments of banks." Let me think for a
moment, what did Christ do to the Money Changers." Oh, Yes,
he severely interfered with their activity. Three days later he was
crucified. Lincoln was killed for interfering with the money changers.
Kennedy was slaughtered for interfering with the money changers.
Let's return to the subject of your property, and the
tax sale for not paying property taxes. In this situation under a
standard deed (not common law deed) you are actually in default. Not
because you understand the default or you like being in default, you
just are in default of the tax payment. So they put your property up for
sale. At the tax sale, Joe Doe, average American, bids on your property
and gets it. Now, there is a procedure he must go through step by step
to establish. He is required to give you another chance. You have six
months and a day to pay off the default. If, at this time, you pay off
the amount the county says you owe, plus penalties, interest, fines,
etc., then your property is taken off default status and it is yours to
continue to pay taxes on the next year.
There was a deal struck that, if any person who
doesn't have a lawyer to bring a case before the courts, and this person
proves the fraud, and speaks the truth about the fraud, the courts are
compelled to not allow the case to be cited or published anywhere. The
courts cannot afford to have the case freely available in the public
archives. This would be evidence of the fraud. That is why you can't
hire an attorney. An attorney is compelled to uphold the fraud.
"I'm Here To Help You."
"I Have The Governments Permission To Practice Law."
"I'm A Member of the Bar."
The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is
to make sure the bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public
policy of the corporate Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyer's will
cite no cases for you that will go against the bankruptcy in corporate
public policy. Whatever the lawyers do for you is a bunch of Bull Shit.
The lawyers have to support the bankruptcy and public policy even at
your expense. The lawyers can't go against the corporate Federal
Government statutes implementing, protecting and administrating the
For all cases cited, those in the US Code or the
state annotated code or any other source, you may be sure that they are
only those selected cases that support the public policy of bankruptcy.
The legal system has to work that way. After the last 30-40-50-60 years
of cases after cases having been decided based upon upholding the
bankruptcy, how could the legal system possibly allow someone to come
into court and put in the record substantial information and argument to
prove the fraud?
BLOOD IN THE STREETS?
Can you imagine how damaging it would be, if they
allowed your case to be cited in another case, or if they allowed the
public to examine a copy of your brief that exposes evidence of the
fraud? This exposure would render null and void everything for which
they have worked so hard. Wouldn't this exposure make the people mad?
Wouldn't this exposure mean there would be blood running in the streets?
Especially the cities where the poor people have been really taken by
this diabolical system. What they are concerned about is that the case
never be cited. That goes against the bankruptcy for fear of exposing
the bankruptcy and the people will then pick up their guns and shoot the
ATTENTION: LAW STUDENT!
You said you wanted to be a lawyer. Well, I hope
you've read this carefully, because here is the legal system you're
headed to serve, and serve you will. You say you wanted to be a lawyer
so you can find out what oath they're taking, in "secret",
behind closed doors in solemn preparation for the "business
of the court" as judges and lawyers.
Now you know the oath. The oath is simply to uphold
the bankruptcy. If you want to be a lawyer and want to make a living as
a lawyer, be careful. They will weed you out at the beginning if you
don't bring in your paperwork under the bankruptcy procedures. If you
try to defend your clients and try to help your clients they will get
rid of you. They will pull your license. So you spent all that money and
time going to school under the guise of helping people and you're
wasting your time. Without a license you can't go into a courtroom. I
would think about this if I were you.
THE LAWYERS GUILD CONNECTION
Here is what happens. The American Bar Association is
a franchise of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain. The American Bar
Association is not connected primarily with what happens in any case on
the local level. However, when a case leaves the local level, by that is
meant, the state court, city court or the justice of the peace, or even
the federal court; and goes to the appeal's court, it would appear that
the American Bar Association takes notice of the case. It would seem
that the American Bar Association must have an agreement that any action
brought on appeal, must be reviewed by the American Bar Association. If
this is true, it would make sense. How else would the American Bar
Association, a branch of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain, which is
the legal arm of the Rothschild's Dynasty, be able to monitor and
administer the corporate bankruptcy. It would appear that the American
Bar Association would be compelled to review all appeal cases and to
make certain any case brought under common law or the constitutional law
that would expose the bankruptcy, would be immediately stamped on the
back that "this case is not to be cited or
published." I believe that this is the stamp origin and
purpose of the stamp message in such cases. The justice department may
be able to do that in Washington D.C.. I can't see where any judge or
lawyer could have the authority to stamp or label the case as one not to
be cited for future cases. I think that is an official stamp from the
American Bar Association.
THE BANKRUPTCY ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
Now, Mr/Ms. Law Student, if you're still attending
classes and you have a good professor, ask him/her about just where the
stamp comes from that you've seen on many cases. Just who put it on the
paperwork and just who authorized the citation restriction. Just who is
tampering with the law. There is one thing certain the creditor and or
his agents are watching these cases very carefully. The creditor and his
agents must balance their books. When you think of the IRS, be aware
that the IRS is an agent of the creditor, the corporate International
Bankers. This is just one of the Bankers' state side agencies. The
General Accounting Office (GAO) is another agency they use for this
This is where all the accounting goes on to keep
track of the debt. All the states have to send reports to Washington
D.C. Washington D.C. has to send reports to the (GAO). Take a look at
your state Comptroller's Annual Report to the Governor of your state. I
found it in the library located in the city of the corporate state
capital. Look under "Trust Fund"
for each state sub-corporation like the state courts, IRS, Banks,
Education, etc. you will be amazed at the amount of money being pumped
into the Trust Fund from the various Corporate State Departmental
Revenues (all revenue is referred to as taxes: fines, fees, licenses,
etc.). There are millions and billions of your hard earned worthless
federal reserve notes, "dollars",
being held in "trust." This money
is being siphoned off into the coffers of the International Bankers
while the corporate government officials are hounding you for more and
more tax dollars.
All this accounting system is NOT so the people will
know what is going on. The accounting reports are for the bankers and
creditors to keep tabs on just where their collections are coming from.
The bankers want to know if the bankruptcy debt payments are coming in
and just how much and from what sources. This accounting is the purpose
behind M1, M2, M3, M4. and M5. All this accounting is closely monitored.
Maybe every day, but at least once a week. These M's are the reports of
the amounts of money in circulation. The amount of debt out there, and
the amount of credit out there. The floating of debt in the form of
bonds. There are five different categories. This system had to come into
existence in order for the creditors to be on top of the bankruptcy at
all times. This system allows the creditors to figure out and know
exactly what is going on in their domain.
It all makes sense. Don't the bankers hire bill
collectors? Creditors hire bill collectors to snoop around do see why
you're not paying. They want do know how much you are going to pay so
they can figure out how much will be coming in. How much they will
collect. They want to know who will pay and who won't.
THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS NOTHING BUT CREDIT AND
THE WORLD CREDIT UNION
Here is what is going to very quickly happen
internationally. All of the governments around the world are going to
unite. They will create one big giant credit union for collecting the
debt for the International Bankers. We have allowed ourselves do get
into this very sad situation, but THAT IS THE
WAY IT IS.
WELCOME TO YOUR