The world is on the verge of the greatest
human tragedy ever known, or even imagined possible, and it is not
an act of God.
"SLAVERY" A TREATISE IN DEVELOPMENT
Frontpiece
PRISON in MIND
| Entering the 21st
century |
| Living as in penitentiary |
| Imprisoned by bars in mind |
| Knowing not our true kind |
| Now no time for despair |
| Bars melt as we grow aware |
Early comment will be
supported, progressively, as this presentation proceeds. Although it
is very important to expose what is going on behind the scenes,
exposure, as you will see, is not enough -- we need to know both the
"mind and method" of enslavement if we are to achieve our
freedom.
Our real tragedy is that, because the poison pills of deceit are
sweet, very few want to face the danger of our situation; this is
why the bars in mind work. Nevertheless, I am confident that, if we
read with a desire for truth (even though truth at first seem remote
or incredible) many lives may be saved.
For those who have the discipline, enterprise and courage to face
the truth, the evidence is overwhelming.
What is hidden, and what few know, is that we have been living
within the confines of contrived belief systems (ideologies) that
make of us servants; this, to the extent that we will kill and risk
our lives for the benefit of our masters -- worse, it deforms our
human development.
Evidence of our situation will include recent quoted comment from
a past Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and Professor John McMurtry:
"A Manifesto of Corporate Totalitarianism", plus other
knowledgeable or, behind the scenes people, from distant past to
present.
COLLINS Dictionary: Slavery: A civil relationship whereby one
person has absolute power over another and controls his life,
liberty and fortune.
The world is in the grip of slavery by belief! Today this
slavery is more oppressive and inescapable than at any previous time
in known history.
Enslavement has a long history and, as you may recall, comment by
Jesus of Nazareth shows He understood slavery by belief and that it
existed at that time; probably the first time it was so recognized
and mentioned in public.
Today, as 2000 years ago, we still do not want to believe that we
are slaves. Pride and prejudice may blind us to reality but today
there is surely a better understanding of social order. Certainly
there is evidence accessible to those who look for it.
Perhaps, of even more importance, is that we may now see how
vital it is that we know the truth of our restricted vision and how
personally disastrous it would be to ignore this truth.
A critical feature of this slavery is that it programs people to
believe that they are not slaves and that true slavery is the
situation where a master owns people, as, for example, at one time
in the USA.
Slavery by physical force is primitive. Slavery by belief is also
very old but instills in the minds of people that they are free.
For example: we know that what we are paid to do also profits
others. Paid labour does not mean slavery but it does provide the
mind with a very secure foundation for a conviction of freedom; this
makes it easier for despots to put enslaving beliefs into the
undefended mind.
Slavery by belief has now become more purposefully used and is
made vastly more efficient by modern science and technology.
Let us begin with a quote
from Dr. Susan George. She has been a consultant to the United
Nations University, to UNESCO, and to the UN's Economic Commission
for Europe, plus the International Union of Food Workers and the
government of Nicaragua, among others. Obviously she knows something
about the UN. Yet, in answer to questions and reported on the ABC
(Australia), we find these comments and more. Quote:
"Well I think the word 'development' is rather
obscene. Development in biology means an organism unfolds
harmoniously in its environment. It means that the flower becomes a
fruit, or the embryo becomes a child. But the social sciences have
taken over this concept and perverted it. When we say 'development'
in the modern sense, we generally mean outside intervention and
meddling. If you meddle too much with an organism, it will be
damaged or will die, which is precisely, I think, what we've been
doing with other people's lives.
I think development has failed largely because the assumptions
that underlay the whole concept were absolutely false."
[I would like you to try to remember those words to, at least,
the end of this treatise; many of the social assumptions we are
taught to believe in, are false. On economic manipulation, she
had the following to say:]
"All these institutions are centralised, hierarchical,
completely undemocratic and working with a lot of money contributed
by their members, mostly their richer members. What do they do with
that money? Well, in many ways they are helping to subjugate all the
economies of the world and making them satellites of "free
enterprise", so to speak. ... So the World Bank is in charge of
imposing this economic doctrine, the International Monetary Fund is
in charge of imposing structural adjustment, in other words
austerity programs in the Third World, and GATT is involved with
indeed reducing not only barriers to trade but any standards --
environmental standards, health standards, high wages -- that could
be considered impediments to trade. I feel very much that the
undemocratic nature of these institutions will mean that a whole New
World order is put into place and that it is an anti-democratic,
authoritarian order run by the élites of the rich world on their
behalf." End quote.
This lady is not afraid to tell the truth but I have to limit
quotes to keep this as 'digestible' as possible while still
explaining sufficiently to make points credible. If I fail you will
never believe that Globalism is evil and that we are involved in the
first "total world" war of history. Let's start at the
shallow end.
News items promote the need
for doing away with all tariffs and trade barriers. They claim that
people, and leading business groups, do not understand the benefits
of globalization -- globalization enables us to buy things cheaper
-- it forces business to become more competitive on world markets --
why are we complaining?
A recent victim was the Australian dairy farming community
(groups picked off, one by one) -- 'deregulation' to improve
efficiency -- lower prices -- make us more competitive! The same
globalization lies -- we have heard them before -- we have seen
their results.
Is it not strange that these advocates of globalization always
forget to mention the number of people that will be put out of productive
work -- and how this is disguised by placing some of them in non-productive
work? I.e. Timber workers become forest wardens; office workers
may be employed working out taxes owed under new complicated tax
systems; factory workers become servants to tourists enticed to
visit because our money is cheap; and so on (these 'make work' jobs
often get in the way of productive work).
Do they ever tell us that those still employed will be taxed to
pay for additional family and unemployed relief? (We, the people,
pay for our own enslavement and taxes are already extremely high).
We then pay higher service prices because of falling efficiency and
the money we have drifts overseas. Do they explain that we lose far
more than we gain?
Do we ever see it mentioned that when we buy good quality imports
the price matches or exceeds what we used to pay for good local
products?
It is now not practical to own slaves but it is OK to go to some
country where people are so poor that they will do anything for a
subsistence pay? This form of slavery is more efficient and people
will buy your rubbish if you sell it cheaper than the local product.
Are we ever told that foreign bargains (sold by globalists for
high profits) are a product of economic slavery; a direct, but more
efficient substitute for owned slaves?
Are we ever told that when we buy goods -- produced by people who
are forced by necessity to work for a pittance, we ourselves, in
fact, then become slave users?
Globalization is the directive, and beneficiary, of this modern
form of physical slavery (poverty enforced labour).
Local producers then have their choice -- go broke or, if they
can afford it, do what the globalists have done and take their
manufacturing to a slave labour country. But how can we keep buying
imports when so many live on pensions or do non-productive work and
our country is not producing enough of real value to pay its way?
The answer is gradualism (the socialist principle for social
subversion): value of our pay gradually declines; governments sell
national assets and borrow money from the international
moneylenders.
In this way, the true costs of using overseas slaves to supply
our needs may remain hidden for many years but the nation is
gradually getting poorer and the people more confused and
frustrated. We cannot understand what is happening -- we become
economically apathetic and devote ourselves to sport --
entertainment -- drugs -- or the new (ideology) religion: all just
as our internationally planned education was designed to achieve.
In the end our nation becomes another slave nation where we work
for a bowl of soup or are manipulated to self-destruct.
So dairy farmers who are fortunate enough to have the best land
and situation are to be forced, like other industries before them,
to work for a pittance, the less fortunate go bankrupt and
international controlled businesses make ever larger profits!
But do not be fooled to believe that only the rural sector is
under attack or that money is what this is all about, or that
political confidence trickery is new or that all those who promote
world government know what they are doing; the blind lead the blind.
A quote from "The portable Emerson" Penguin. First
published in 1841. Quote: "The farmer imagines power and
place are fine things. But the President has paid dearly for his
White House. It has commonly cost him all his peace, and the best of
his manly attributes. To preserve for a short time so conspicuous an
appearance before the world, he is content to eat dust before the
real masters who stand erect behind the throne." End quote.
What is happening is not new -- it is about is POWER -- today
the aim is the achievement of total power to own the world as a
globalist domain.
The producers of wealth lose, the people are impoverished, and
governments give handouts of our money to keep us believing that
government is trying to help.
They deceive, divide and rob the community (in pretence of
efficiency and international welfare) to benefit globalist plans. *
*Note: The above refers to a year 2000 Australian situation
but relates also to situations existing in all nations. The net
tightens! While the above may seem mundane (what caring people
should already know) this is a real "life and death" war
and we would not need this 'wake-up' call if we were alert to the
real world and not living in a mind sedated dream that is rapidly
becoming a nightmare. We need to use all logic at our command to see
the truth of the evidence. This war is undeclared because a very
small number cannot expect to win a fair fight against a very large
number; it is secret because, if the large number knows it is being
attacked, the attack can be defeated. Economic disasters, diseases,
political mistakes, are naturally possible; when introduced to cause
public distress these can always be disguised as natural events.
This dirty war would, by the UN's own definition, have to be
classed as having the intent of genocide (the deliberate destruction
of national or ethnic groups) though always made to appear otherwise
by supporting the smaller to weaken the larger.
In our deceived state, we may think that the internationals would
want everyone working productively but mechanization and technology
now mean that there are too many workers and too much industrial
waste.
So why do they not reduce working hours and working years and
encourage people to a more relaxed and more enlightened way of life?
A very human solution; but globalism is not human and the power
and pride bound up in deceit and enslavement is not for humane
ambition.
Should we ask ourselves: WHY HAVE AUSTRALIANS -- and people of
all advanced nations -- SURRENDERED TO CRIME?
WELL (if we are human and
not dumb animals) we can unite against this globalist form of Mafia.
Unfortunately, before this can happen, we have to face (what
cannot be intelligently denied) that our government is NOT
democratic and is not "OUR" government -- that
"Party Government" is an elitist owned part of "world
government" plans.
They tell us we must vote for them because "it is
democracy"! But it is not democracy because, before we choose
our preferred liars, the teams have already been chosen by
manipulation agents -- almost all candidates on offer are people
that the internationals can control.
Is it not obvious? The internationals support people who are
greedy for power but incompetent -- they choose egocentric people
who need globalist (world government) advisers. Were the parliament
chosen by lottery we would get a more competent team?
The party system was introduced to England in the reign of
Charles II (1630-85) after 300 years of non-party government by what
became known as the "Model Parliament". Then began the
struggle for power that is now reaching its climax as a world
dictatorship. Parties were not an original part of any democratic
system or constitution (Britain, USA and Australia included). It is
not possible for "party system" government to be
democratic.
A local quote may be helpful, let's hear it from an ex-Labor
Party MP. Barry Cohen, in an article in "The Australian"
(6/4/1992); quote:
"... as I sat down and heard the PM snarl a welcome
"Get on with it." I realized something was amiss. Seated
slightly to the rear of himself, the treasurer, the minister for
finance et al, was a phalanx of grey-faced, grey-suited strangers.
To this day, I have no idea who they were. I was, however, to learn
quickly what they were. ...I was informed ... they had been seconded
from government departments, the private sector and universities
within minutes of the government taking office. ... the key people
in the PM's office who had to be convinced first. It was a waste of
time going to the prime minister and convincing him if the minute
you left the minders gave it the thumbs down. It is and was
outrageous but I doubt it will ever change whether the government is
Labor or Liberal." End quote.
Agreed, it will never change, it can never change, so long as
party system government rules! The party is governed by a behind
scenes administration and even the National Constitution and law of
the land are not respected. How could it be otherwise when the party
system itself is unconstitutional both by its moral nature and all
democratic values? It even contravenes the "Crimes Act";
quote: "28. Any person who, by violence or threats or
intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free
exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right
or duty, shall be guilty of an offence." EQ.
Is it not clear that if 'your' political representative is a
member of a party then your representative is pressured to support
the party even if this is against a member's own best judgement and
opposed to the political duty of representing the electorate?
Therefore 'your' representative is not your representative but, in
fact, represents the party that chose him. But, you may say, we do
have a democratic choice of party! Yes we do, but parties --
establishment ruled -- are a meaningless choice!
If we cannot honestly face this, then all our effort and
resistance implies political legitimacy and is counter-productive.
It lets our enemy know that we really do not understand what is
happening and that he has us securely in his web of deceit. It tells
the silent majority that we have a legitimate democracy.
Who does the political party represent?
As Disraeli said over a hundred years ago; quote:
"The world is governed by very different persons from
what those believe who are not behind the scenes." EQ.
When Disraeli said, "the world" this, at that time,
meant "the world of European peoples". To understand our
present political culture it is essential we understand this comment
by Disraeli. There was, and still is, a hidden government behind the
apparent government -- "parties" represent those who
choose party leaders. New parties either fail or become infiltrated
before they can gain useful power. Our party choice only decides
which party will serve the establishment. In other words the
pretended 'choice' is only a confidence trick us make us believe we
have a choice.
There are pages of quotes from eminent people in my books; this,
in part at least, is a condensation of previous work. It is no
longer so much a matter of evidence as of whether people want to
know the truth; if they don't want to face their fantasies then
they refuse to be convinced by any amount of evidence; it's as
simple as that. But, whatever we may want to believe -- political
parties are not there to represent the people.
It should be self-evident that, ultimately, it is we, the
people, who are responsible for our own enslavement -- we are not
overwhelmed by numbers, our numbers make us supremely powerful -- it
is not the law, the law requires our freedom!
It is so comforting to believe the law is enforced -- so
comforting to know we have the numbers and right to enforce it -- so
comforting to believe we are free. It is so comforting to believe we
do not need to defend our heritage that we hide behind our delusions
and hate the whistle blowers.
Oh yes, we are responsible for our slavery, the slavery of our
children and of our grandchildren. So long as we expect strangers to
take care of us, then they will make of us their slaves.
At first they ignore the law, once certain that they can get away
with this they can change the law -- if they need to. They use us
and abuse us and will, when we become too much of a pollutant in
their world, have us destroy each other by means that they have us
design, pay for and use.
Have you wondered why there are so many new diseases appearing?
The evidence does not always support that these are chance events.
We cry -- they laugh! We beg -- they despise us! Do we not
deserve our fate?
Why are we afraid? There are still, in the world, people so
principled that they will (as did our ancestors) face death for
community freedom -- we beg; when all we have to do is support our
legal heritage.
If we can just overcome our implanted conceits, sufficient to
understand and admit that we are slaves only because we fear to take
responsibility for our own political representatives, we may then
find that we are worthy of our freedom.
Violence! No! At this stage we do not have to, and should not,
use violence! Violence plays into globalist hands! We can build
progressively. For instance: we have people who are concerned and
are of proven competence in management. Many of these people could
and (if asked and backed by a significant representation) would,
take on the management of a public enterprise to organize,
manufacture and sell in public owned shops, nationally produced
goods. This, in a small way, is already beginning.
Please note those important words -- if community
"ASKED". We MUST NOT ask for volunteers or employ a
professional management company, (a self-interest party). Is it not
clear what that has done for us politically?
Organized political parties -- independents who beg for our
support -- most are egomaniacs who want to run our lives and can't
run their own -- people who are not traitors but who, in blind
ignorance of consequences, sell their nation to feed their egomania.
We see too many examples of politician greed and stupidity?
We should not accept those who love power and position. The safe
way is to choose people from our community who are of proven
competence and common concern -- ask these to manage group affairs;
when good people see that they have a popular mandate most will take
up the challenge.
In this way organized groups of farmers and small business could
process their own products and sell direct to the public through
public owned retail stores.
If we can gain confidence to take the step to commercial
independence we will then have confidence to take the vital step to
political independence and, thereby, open for ourselves the way to
the truth of life.
Australian governments
have, for years, used primary producers as a slave class to help
keep city voters happy with cheap food. But farm poverty meant that
over-use of land become a farm practice. International chemical
companies then came to the aid of farmers with fertilizers that
further harm the soil and insecticides that harm our health; they
have no concern for either -- or the price of food.
This has resulted in an ecological disaster that will take years
to fix and which cannot be fixed by the debt ridden farm sector
alone.
The reason I mention this is to show that enslavement by lies
and deceit has ramifications that enter the very soul of community;
it is not just community robbery. Every economic, civil and moral
aspect of community gradually becomes deformed and self-destructive.
Although people do not seem to realize it, biological life
(animal, human, insect) is designed to an order of principles of
construction; biological mechanisms represent biological
engineering. As a result, life itself, culture, economy, morality
must also be in accord with these principles or will be destructive
to the potential of the organism.
Globalism attempts to create a world to a private design! For
culture to advance we need an increasingly disciplined, more
responsible, more moral community. Globalism wants to create a world
that, in principle, is less human than that now existing and, in
fact, denies the general community basic social understanding --
even the very existence of structural morality is denied. In the
past national leaders needed people to defend them against their
neighbours and so had a vested interest in community health and
strength but, to a globalist world-government, nationalism is
dangerous.
What is happening is not happening because of administrative
ignorance. We, the people (those who do not serve a use in the plans
of the globalists) now become the enemy: international armed
services will fill the bodyguard need.
International government -- globalization -- does not need you --
or me -- or small business; they want to own all means of
production; a goal that is now largely achieved and, in the end,
they want production to serve only their own needs.
The majority of us are already doing non-productive work or
living on government hand-outs. If WE DO NOT CARE ENOUGH to care for
ourselves how long will it be before most remaining productive
workers are replaced by technology? Why then would globalists carry
us as useless and dangerous baggage?
What use is it to complain about globalist greed? Why would they
take notice of us except to throw us crumbs while they steal the
bread? The way to defeat them is to take responsibility for our own
lives -- put them out of business. It may not be easy but the way to
freedom is still an open road.
A great kaleidoscope of evidence points to the danger we face;
shall we gamble the future of humanity that the evidence is wrong?
World government is now the
admitted goal of global politics and has many adherents; it is
expressed openly in an emotional way but can not be openly
explained. World government is the origin of our, emotion driven,
"politically correct" ideology.
Ideology is our thoughts and attitudes prison.
Very few of us have given the globalist power structure, and the
manner of its progress over the years, much thought -- we
(brainwashed) prefer to leave such things to the political
mercenaries we pay to take care of us. Few of us have any
understanding of what this (secretly developed plan) would mean to
the human race should it become fully implemented.
How many suspect that this "New World Order" is a
planned oligarchy? Were it not planned for the benefit of the few
then the plan would have, at its beginning, been openly displayed
for public consideration and support. How many see signs that a
world enslaved to an ideological idea (where the establishment
controls education and will itself have an education that is quite
different to that given the 'common people') is a disaster in
progress?
How many have noticed that, in discussions of human behaviour,
the words 'training' and 'education' have now replaced
"understanding " and "enlightenment"? You are no
longer expected to understand "right or wrong" "good
or bad"; the concept of "truth" is being educated out
-- truth is not supposed to have meaning for us 'common people': good
-- bad -- truth -- we are told, are just personal preferences. This
is a conceit that we are programmed (educated) to believe. But,
though pleasing to the young and ignorant, let us not be fooled;
only by facing the truth can we set ourselves free.
If you cannot believe they would be so deceitful, so inhuman, to
their own people you haven't learned your history. Here is what a
present MP, Kim Beazley, had to say (The Australian 28/8/1997);
quote:
"I believe these things are done incrementally. You
prepare a public mind, a public attitude; you create an acceptance
of the unacceptable -- at least the unacceptable at this point of
time." End Q.
Note: you: meaning we -- not they: meaning others.
Or you cannot believe that they are trying to teach your
children that there is no truth! Listen to Dame Leonie Kramer,
Chancellor of Sydney University (Courier Mail 12/9/1997); quote:
"You have to deal with the fact that there are plenty
of people in the world now who will tell you that you mustn't use
the word truth, as there's no such thing. I think that way, madness
lies." End Q.
How many see that enslavement of the "common mind"
to false social concepts is to create a common mind confusion and
social divisions that will defeat common cause? It is a policy of
divide and conquer; it protects 'the masters'?
Were there no masters there would be no need for deceit and no
need for emotion driven ideology. How seldom we see, or hear, the
word "oligarchy" today. Oligarchy means government by a
small group of people.
Who are the unknown people who direct the plans of the 'United
Nations'? Have you any idea who does set policy guidelines for the
UN?
Do you think it is the member governments? From where do they get
their instructions? Has anyone ever heard arguments put forward
in parliament for this huge, and hugely complicated, globalist plan
-- are there any records of this discussion in Hansard? Do you
really believe that representatives from a number of governments
would ever agree about, or even think of, such a program? 'Party
political' vision and concern doesn't reach beyond the next
election. How and why would they secretly work out details of a plan
covering generations if not supervised and given a piece of agenda
to work to? *
*Note: "a piece of the agenda". By always giving
supporters a small piece of the agenda it can be made to look like a
step to benefit community.
If you cannot believe politicians would, or could, create these
plans, then you are right; it is known to those who want to know,
that the governments of the world, especially those calling
themselves democracies, have long been ruled by an invisible
government.
We only need to listen to something like the 'greenhouse
emissions' debate (year 2000) to see that party politicians cannot
plan co-operatively when not under instructions; (they are only
instructed when matters directly effect globalist plans; to
globalists, 'greenhouse' at present serves best a socially divisive
and economically disruptive campaign).
What about all the 'Conventions' and other socially directive
material produced by the United Nations? Example: "The
Convention of the Rights of the Child": A casual reading gives
an impression of support for traditional family values such as
Article 14: "States Parties shall respect the rights and duties
of parents … to provide direction to the child …". Article
18 gives parents' primary responsibility for the child's upbringing
and development. However, these are undermined. Article 13 giving
the child right to freedom to seek, and impart ideas of all kinds.
Article 15 guarantees "freedom of association". Article 16
guarantees "privacy". We also find a right of health care.
So it seems the child is given rights to live a private life that
is secret and separate from parental guidance. The predominately
'good' part of the Convention is unnecessary. In just about all
civilized countries parent's rights are taken as natural. It is
therefore the 'bad' parts that are the meaningful parts. These are
the parts that give educators rights to social subversion and the
law to protect them. The rest, mere camouflage, as many parents of
teenage children find to their distress.
How many suspect that a world owned by an oligarchy will result
in a severe reduction in world population? Can we not see that they
do not want THEIR resources wasted; or the threat of massive
rebellion; nor do they want the pollution now created in service to
the common mass? (About 90% of people are now, not just of no value
to the globalists, but a menace.)
WHAT makes us believe that the rich and powerful care about the
common mass? Do cigarette makers, bankers or casino operators care
what happens to their customers? Do governments ever hesitate to
involve us in war?
It is very depressing (now that so much evidence is available) to
find that activists cannot bring themselves to face that government
does not govern by the law of the Constitution - that what is law is
decided by those who have the power to enforce it.
That so many close their eyes to the reality that government does
not work for communal advancement, defence and prosperity -- that
education is no longer designed to encourage moral values, social
enlightenment, human progress and satisfaction -- that law is no
longer designed to deliver justice or protect the innocent -- that
health services are no longer designed,primarily, to benefit the
health, comfort and long life of the people.
Why have social activists learned nothing from the last twenty
years -- or even the last two thousand? Why do people who well know
the reality of law, party corruption and finance, still mob the
streets to tell leaders what leaders know better than we? (When we
try to explain 'bad' government to quislings we are playing footsies
with a nest of vipers and helping mislead the great silent majority
into the belief that we have a legal government.
What next: civil war? Will we then elect a new management that,
before we have recovered from the shambles, will be strutting the
same path as the old?
Will we forever be seduced to avoid our responsibilities and
ignore the lessons of our past?
Slaves have, for centuries, been part of human culture but the
world of the 20th Century thought the overthrow of slavery in the
USA was the end of it. Sadly no, this only made clear the path for a
more effective slavery of the public mind. Those greedy for power
knew that the ultimate goal of world ownership could not be achieved
so long as there was any real independence for the human mind in
devotion to truth, or, physically, some truly independent
'life-choices' for the common herd. Truth is freedom!
To break down remaining independence was imperative! Scientific
study of human behaviour and human weakness was essential; (the
essence of that program is told in "BRAIN-WASH"). A
significant statement now from Edward Bernays who, early in the last
century, was leading the new science, "Public
Relations" *. Quote:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the
organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element
in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of
society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling
power of our government.
We are governed, our minds moulded, our tastes formed, our ideas
suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is the
logical result of the way in which our democratic society is
organised," EQ.
*Note: 'Public Relations' such a nice 'mother love' name for
"people control/slavery". It is as George Orwell said:
'hate' will be called 'love' -- 'war' - 'peace'.
You may be interested to know that Bernays was not exposing the
corruption of humanity, he was proud of what he was doing. Was he
correct in saying that: "This is the logical result of the
way in which our democratic society is organised"? He was,
but only so long as we understand that 'our democratic society' is a
sham or fake democratic society that is controlled by despots. A
true democratic society could never be organized in this way because
what is being done was secretly planned -- it had to be secret
because it is neither democratic nor for the public good.
In 1976 Bertrand Russell "The Impact of Science on
Society" was able to safely reveal that education was
aiming to impress such ideals and concepts on the child mind that "after
pupils have left school, they will be incapable ... of thinking or
acting otherwise than their schoolmasters would have wished."
He could say that openly; there was no outcry because the
programming of the public mind was already effective.
Why do human societies grow, disintegrate and collapse? May it
not be safely assumed that they are more or less successful because
of the degree of truth and error in their beliefs? In our situation
the cracks will quickly widen, the money confidence trick will
collapse and the great prostituted commercial system will
disintegrate with vast, world-wide, suffering. But we do not have to
let it end like that.
As mentioned, control of human behaviour by control of human
belief is not new, it has been practiced, to some extent, for about
as far back as written evidence can take us. As an example, consider
this quote from "Indian Philosophy" by
Radhakrishnan.
Quote: "One of the leading principles of the mystics
was the sacredness and secrecy of self-knowledge and the true
knowledge of the gods. This wisdom was, they thought, unfit for,
perhaps even dangerous to, the ordinary human mind; ... Hence they
favoured the existence of an outer worship, effective but imperfect,
for the profane..." EQ.
Well, as those who want to can see for themselves, it is already
evident that the new religion (intended for us who have been
deceived to become the new human 'profane') is to be a form of
humanistic nature worship. Once fully established then the slave
class will be enticed to the belief that the elite are a superior
evolutionary form (which they are not) and that any needed slaves
are fortunate to have these superior beings there to take care of
them (which will be a lie).
Slavery to belief is the most effective form of slavery known
but, to impose it, you have to be more egotistic than clever and
more brutal than moral. These people are not mentally or morally
superior to the general public.
You see, what the elitists know and the consequences of which
they have always been careful to keep from the clear understanding
of the public, is that we all tend to try to act in accordance with
what we believe to be true. If you can convince people of lies then
they will act to your agenda.
Obvious is it not?
It is common sense -- we need the truth to make useful decisions
-- decisions based on lies are not likely to give the results we
desire but may suit, very well, the plans of those who tell us the
lies.
How very, very thin the bars limiting our perceptions!
But how very, very effective when we do not want to see through
these barriers!
As is so often said: there is not much that is new under the sun.
The first step to creating a new set of social beliefs (a new
ideology) is to create a confusion of beliefs. We are educated to
dislike challenge to our comfortable beliefs! During the last
century, to a confusion of scientific discoveries were added many
challenges; talk of: subliminal messages -- drugs in the water
supply -- foreign troops stationed on our soil -- victimless crimes
-- there is no truth -- fluoride toothpaste for sedation -- God is
dead -- creation of life by evolution and so on. What are you to
believe when the facts are hidden?
So, when faced with confusion, we normally believe what we want
to believe, and what we want to believe is certainly NOT that we are
enslaved by the exciting beliefs and attitudes encouraged at school
and ceaselessly promoted through the mass media. The TV has been a
wonderful aid to the globalists.
Being lazy is nice -- taking drugs is fun -- disobeying parents
and authorities is exciting -- being immoral is great. So we clamour
for more of the poison: more education; more entertainment; more
sport; less social discipline. The highest accolade we can bestow on
the propaganda experts is that we beg for more. The hooks in the
public mind are scientifically set and who wants to think about what
they might gain from reality. (Have we not been taught that there is
no truth -- no reality?) If there is no truth how can life be
wasted? Without truth, cruelty or kindness, good or bad -- all is
meaningless myth and make-believe. But -- if there is no truth --
how can that be true?
Time for another quote,
Machiavelli (1469-1527) Quote:
"One of the great secrets of the day is to know how to
take possession of popular prejudices and passions in such a way as
to introduce a confusion of principles which make impossible all
understanding between those who speak the same language and have the
same interests." E.Q.
TRUTH is FREEDOM -- deceit means enslavement.
Slavery -- The New World Order -- exciting isn't it?
According to Paul Hellyer,
former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada; quote:
"... globalisation is just a code word for
corporatisation and colonisation. * The transnationals want to
re-engineer the world in such a way that they don't have to pay
taxes to support social security and fix pot holes in the roads or
maintain parks, and don't have to pay their employees decent wages.
"What they're doing is they're re-creating the conditions
that existed in the time of Dickens, the Dickensian era. They're
moving production to places, such as Honduras, where they pay women
absolute starvation wages, working 13 hours a day, up to seven days
a week -- no environmental standards, no health care. If they get
pregnant, they get fired. If they get sick, they get fired. This
erases 100 years of the legislation which gave workers rights, such
as holidays with pay and pensions and protection against injury and
so on -- and the benefits of unionisation.
"Well, the process has reached the point where Lewis
Lapham, editor Harpers Magazine, says the U.S. has two governments:
the permanent and the provisional. The permanent government consists
of the Fortune 500 magazine's largest companies, also the largest
law firms and public relations firms in Washington that work for
those companies, and the top bureaucrats, both civil and military
and they're the permanent government.
"Then there is what they call an election every once in a
while and they elect the provisional government and they elect
actors that come on stage and read the script written by the
permanent government." EQ, Emphasis added. Speech by
the Honourable Paul Hellyer at the "Save Canada
Conference" held in Ottawa August 20 and 21, 1999)
"Does it sound familiar? Does it ring a bell? The answer is
Quigley. Remember? Way back in 1966 he said that in the US every
four years the people -- and by that word he meant the masses, the
rabble, the hoi polloi, us -- could vent their spleen by "kicking
the rascals out" without really having any effect on policy
direction. Are people slowly waking up?" End quote.
The above arrived by email but I also heard the P. Hellyer talk
on Australian ABC. Radio. Quigley (an insider) wrote a large book
called "Tragedy and Hope"; published in 1966 by
Macmillan; N.Y. Like Bernays, what he reveals is revealed in pride,
not anger. I don't have to read it, there is more than enough
evidence for what is happening, but it is said to be very revealing
of world government at that time. "Are people slowly waking
up" or has our will for freedom been already drained from us?
The evidence of mind manipulation is enormous, but is only
meaningful to those who know that truth is essential for their
beneficial decision-making; these are people who have the courage
and self-discipline to suppress pride, arrogance, selfishness and/or
prejudice to achieve a predominately unbiased viewpoint.
The point is that those capable of awakening can still do a lot
to save themselves should the majority deliver themselves to
termination.
Do not, for one minute, think that I am revealing plans that
have been kept secret; evidence has been widely available throughout
the world. I cannot reveal all the evidence, there is just too much
of it, but there is here, in this treatise, enough evidence to cause
people to rise in rebellion if they want to know the truth, make
sense of what is happening, and save themselves. The secret that
globalists do not reveal is the precise science of manipulation
revealed here.
You could almost say that the establishment has been at pains to
have their plans revealed. Why! I cannot be sure -- perhaps they
have an agreement with God to warn people of what they do -- perhaps
there is, after all, a conscience in even the blackest heart --
perhaps they just like to flaunt their power -- or then again,
perhaps they feel the need of an excuse so that if they were ever to
be confronted they could say: "But we never kept what we were
doing secret! It was written in books available to the public; it
was broadcast over wireless and TV; we did not even stop people
reporting -- it was told in newspaper articles and privately written
literature. The fact is that people like to be children, they want
someone to take care of them even if some have to die for the
privilege. We offered a service and it was accepted! You can't blame
us! Certainly we did not allow much publicity. You can't expect us
to force people to face the fact of the consequences of giving power
over their lives to strangers!
And so on; even I know that I am not so likely to suffer harm
from a confident establishment; (they must now be very confident
that the majority cannot see reason and that those who do fear to
tell the truth). However, should it be that information given here
is getting through the mind bars, be assured the establishment will
take defensive action. All considered, it is likely my greater
danger is that the general public may hate, with such passion, as to
murder those who try to force them to face the truth. *
*Note: Example: the Crucifixion: Pilate found no case
against Jesus but the crowd shouted crucify. To better understand
why a large number of people would want to crucify those who try to
help them, we might refer to a philosopher from ancient Greece. Was
it Aristotle, Plato or Socrates (perhaps a reader will enlighten)
who explained that if people were bound so that they saw only
shadows on a wall they would, in time, come to believe that the
shadows were the reality; if then, you were to tell them that the
shadows were only shadows, they would laugh at you; should you
persist to force them see the truth they would turn on you and try
to kill you.
The reason for such behaviour is that people have been seduced to
excessive pride and deceived about the need for truth; we are
mentally bound to believe in shadows and see ourselves as the
beliefs we live by. In this situation an attack on core beliefs is
personal -- to accept correction means accepting that our lives, to
this point, have been based on delusions.
We overcome this problem if we realize that the most basic nature
of life, is truth. Truth is the ordering and discipline of chaos;
without truth in the order of things there is no life. A move closer
to truth, at any age, is a move toward reality.
Unfortunately, educated to self-righteousness, many are overcome
by the emotion of imagined great loss -- they will not think clearly
to see that truth brings reality (true meaning) and great comfort to
their living.
Human culture is largely
controlled by the human perception of the nature and meaning of
life; this perception is the most basic force in social behaviour.
Human life has never had better opportunities but, is the world
becoming filled with violence, misery, futility, frustration and
selfish greed because people are making life decisions based on
false beliefs?
Has the choice between the creation of life by chance and the
creation of life by intelligence been very carelessly (or was it
skillfully) misrepresented?
The choice between religions based on these two opposing concepts
is too important to human survival to be left to persuasion by
vested interests.
Intelligent research and unbiased judgement is needed!
The fate of life on earth is in the balance!
*******
Who am I? I am a person who spent a lifetime in search to find
the true nature of social order and uncover which of our two basic
belief systems is the fake. Luckily, I, very early in life, realized
that what people thought had very little relation to the true nature
of things; I therefore chose to ignore all ideas and sects and
search the evidence for myself. The evidence showed that life was
created by intelligence.
Have I missed something? Over the years challenge to the
establishment has produced no response -- silence is their defence.
If I am wrong please show me the scientific evidence, the logical
evidence and the rational conclusions. The following quotes support
the findings of my research.
*******
Science can give no
answer as to how the universe began. Something from nothing -- or
something everlasting, without beginning or end -- either is a
statement of faith. Therefore, the evidence must be with the
creation of life: Could life be created by chance or must it be a
design of intelligence?
Science says that the ultimate proof of any concept should be
mathematical. Is it interesting that mathematics is not an
encouraged subject in today's education and, in fact, a large
percentage of Australia's competent mathematicians have been
'bought' by more wealthy nations? I offer three sources of
mathematical support:
Q1) Sir Fred Hoyle and associate C. Wickramasinghe, in their
book: "Evolution from space", say: ...there are
about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in
a random trial .. is an outrageously small probability that could
not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic
soup." They go on to say of evolution theory: "If
one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific
training into the conviction .. this simple calculation wipes the
idea entirely out of court." End quotes. Emphasis
added.
Q2) Dr H.B. Holroyd Ph.D., "Quest for Valid
Economics" a mechanical engineer and physicist, and retired
head of the Department of Physics, Augustana College, USA tells us
that the Darwinian error was caused by human sloth and the failure
to use necessary mathematics. Holroyd claims that the
design of life by chance is nonsense. Quote:
"Darwinism is physical and mathematical nonsense, and
it is logical nonsense as well, for a sound thinker does not assume
anything which must be deduced from his theory. Darwinism is,
indeed, far more a blunder than a theory, and physical scientists
should have shown this clearly and effectively decades ago". also:
"Physical Scientists, who know higher mathematics and
are capable of analytical thinking, should never have allowed the
thoroughly mistaken mechanical theory of evolution to reach such a
degree of apparent certainty in the thoughts of nearly
everyone." EQ. E.A.
Q3) Giovanni Blandino S.J. in his book "Theories on the
Nature of Life" says: "Summing up, we may say: In
the hypothesis of equiprobability, the probability that a regular
structure should form, either by generation or by gradual evolution,
is equal to the probability that the same structure should form
immediately from matter irregularly arranged. (Principle of
invariableness of probabilities)." EQ.
The mathematical evidence conclusively denies the possibility of
creation by chance but let us go the extra mile! What about
intelligent logic and those old bones?
Norman Macbeth (author of Darwin Retried) is of the opinion that
Chance Creation is no more than a mishmash of escapism and
confusion. Original Darwinism was found faulty by top scientists and
even dogmatic evolutionists replaced it with something called the
'Synthetic Theory'. In a 1983 interview he makes these comments;
quote: "But a much deeper and more penetrating analysis
of the problem was put together by Professor R.H. Brady .. in the
quarterly called "Systematic Zoology" for December 1979 ..
I think it destroys the idea of natural selection, and this is
certainly the opinion of many people at the American Museum of
Natural History." EQ.
So both sides of the (never scientific) theory of chance and
natural selection are refuted. The fossil evidence also denies
evolution! This was confirmed in October 1980 when some 160 of the
world's top anatomists, palaeontologists, evolutionary geneticists,
etc., met at what is commonly known as The Chicago Conference. They
were forced to admit that the fossil evidence did not support
Darwinian evolution and they could find no option other than to fall
back on the previously ridiculed 'hopeful monster' theory. However
this has never been admitted into education and the replacement
theory has never been taught.
Is this because it is so obviously ridiculous and foul of all
rational science or because any shake to the foundations of
Darwinism might undermine globalist plans?
A prominent fact long accepted by science is that, over time,
creatures tend to become specialized and then extinct. The evidence
of genetic loss is beyond doubt -- the evidence of specialization is
established -- but there is no, or only trivial, evidence of genetic
creation by chance. If it does occur it is too rare to create new
creatures when opposed by the vast natural forces of genetic
destruction. *
*Note: Natural selection is not itself disputed, what is
disputed is what it does. What it does is work to maintain the
efficiency of genetic structures against natural forces of genetic
corruption, what it does not and cannot do, is create new
life-forms.
The theory of chance creation is a religion not a scientific
theory.
We should also be aware that theist religions do not logically
follow the nature and ideals of their foundations any more than
atheist religion (humanism) follows the science it claims as its
base. Theist or atheist -- all religions reflect, too closely, the
desires of their followers, too loosely, the source of their faith.
Religions cannot be relied on for authority; the number of
religions claiming Christianity demonstrate how human desires bias
away from the source claimed as their inspiration.
I do not intend to deal in depth with the Christian Bible but
must say that it requires a clinical purity of interpretation. We
must become open to truth and not just seek support for human
desires. To see the truth we need honesty! We must be aware of the
worldly desire to defend pride and prejudice -- a worldly desire to
evade responsibility -- of the worldly desire to want to maintain a
mother figure that will give unconditional love.
Those who search for truth have to try to filter out the
worldly element that has polluted the words of Jesus and helped the
growth of the ideological (humanist) religion promoted by globalism.
"I have not come to bring peace, but a sword"
-- this is plain intelligence when applied to the situation of
bringing truth to a slave world.
John 14:15-17. "I am the way; I am truth and I am
life; no one comes to the Father except by me."; "truth"
is absolutely basic to life -- to the creation of life and to
successful human endeavour. That the way to life is through truth is
the simple, essential and all embracing message of life.
It seems to me that when we look without compromise for the words
of an advanced being among the words attributed to Jesus, we find
them. They are statements not properly understood by the confused
population (either then or now) and not wanted by those looking for
a 'big brother' or 'mummy'. The truth will, indeed, set us free but
we must be willing to be truthful and responsible, each for our own
life. "Put not the Lord your God to the test," warns that
if we will not defend ourselves -- if we leave it to others (even
God) to look after us, then we will never be free or know truth.
We must accept our responsibilities! We are born with
responsibilities, not rights - rights have to be earned. Do not bury
your talents whether of mind or pocket! There is truth in the
saying, God helps those who help themselves; also those who
honestly try.
Professor Hoyle, while on a lecture tour of Australia (1982)
said: Quote:
"Rejection of Darwinian evolutionary beliefs is crucial
to the survival of life on earth... Once you believe in the
evolutionary theory that the weakest go to the wall and that nothing
can be done about the selection process, then its an open invitation
to the kind of political behaviour we've had over the last
century." EQ.
Mindless chance creation also goes a long way to explaining
the growing despair of the young. Creation by chance -- life without
future or meaning -- has been of great help to spawn a culture of
drugs, recklessness, suicide, violence and rebelliousness among the
intelligent young. But the globalist crime against children does not
stop there: an example, among many, is the fact that laws have been
introduced, at the demand of the United Nations, to encourage
lawlessness!
Discipline of children is discouraged! The most effective form of
discipline, loving physical punishment, is outlawed even though it
is the product of thousands of years of experience and there is no
research evidence to support the claimed human benefit of the new,
purely emotional, 'politically correct' ideology.
NOTE: Many quotes in this segment are from my book "The
Human Choice". Note also that this segment of this treatise
is predominately based on my own research and investigation, other
segments have large support from the research and investigations of
many others over many years.
It seems likely that we all, at the beginning, believed we were
investigating corruption and deceit within our national government,
however, when the evidence is assembled it is clear that what we
have been looking at is far more treacherous, much bigger, more
personal and even older than the government of Australia.
Our teachers so
convivial make all our subjects trivial
Should we learn something useful it really is a treat
they hold our hands and soothe us until we learn 'delete'.
We learn to sit like doggies on dirt and on our rears
and what we all end up with is muck between our ears. *
*Note: In Sydney today it is not unusual to see schoolchildren
sitting "like doggies" on the pavement. Many people will
remember a time when such behaviour would have brought reprimand; we
would have been told, "You are not animals." Behaving like
animals is now encouraged and, although children have been given
'rights' and encouraged to use them, these rights, along with their
teaching, is to encourage children to despise the learning
experience of centuries, to be contemptuous of self discipline and
to believe it adult to return to the simple childish freedom of
primitive animal behaviour.
Did you know that the NSW Federation of Parents and Citizens
Associations issued a guide book (1985) which contained the
following directive on page 47? Quote:
(f) Drug education
(i) Drug education should become part of the
present and proposed Personal Development Programs within the
schools.
(ii) Drug education is ideally presented
within the school situation under the following conditions:
* Where the teachers have received the fullest
possible in-service training in the Personal Development Field.
* Where the students receive their drug
education program by a teacher known to them.
* Teachers should never give undue emphasis
to, nor in any way underline the dangers of drugs. End
quote.
How many parents and citizens do you know who want amoral drug
education in their children's schools, or want drugs taking
surreptitiously encouraged?
Did you say none? Well how did this instruction get into this
P&C guidebook? The above quote was from my book "Assault
on Childhood" (now sold out) so I can tell you that finding
out how this became part of a P&C guide book met with some
resistance and attempted misinformation. It seems that it was
introduced by the "executive"; no record of this drugs
policy ever being discussed or voted on could be found in any year
book but it was claimed to have been a 'democratic' decision. Of
course it was -- a democratic decision between the executive! But
equally we all should know, and by now accept, that, in the New
World Order, 'democracy' does not include the 'common' people.
We also see that this policy is hidden under health policy and
taught under "Personal Development": i.e. the art of
enticing children to make their own decisions based on their own
experience (read "in-experience" and meaning "ignore
parents".) *
*Note: Yes it is natural for children to "grow up" and
move away from home so it is not difficult to persuade most parents
that a rebellious 14 year old is 'advanced' and not acting as a
result of teaching planned for cultural genocide. As we have seen,
reality is something we do not want to face.
Public education is controlled by government; is it possible that
OUR government could deliberately encourage degeneracy? Could OUR
government encourage immoral attitudes -- pornographic depravity --
anti-social behaviour?
An example of how deliberately hard core porn and depravity was
'smuggled' into the Australian mind is found in "The report
of the Joint Select Committee on Video Material" Vol.1.
Canberra 1988, p15 - 17. Quote:
"It is considered that almost all States would be
hostile to a policy that could lead to the circulation of so-called
hard core pornography and material dealing with hard drugs and
extreme violence, anarchy and sedition."
'The document raised for consideration the question of whether
the policy announced by the Attorney-General should be brought fully
and immediately into effect or by stages. It stated:'
"You would need to have regard to repercussions in the
electorate; the Australian public is notoriously conservative,
whatever its political affiliations.
The Government's policy might best be achieved by a strategy of
hastening slowly -- gradually broadening the standards of imported
material so that public opinion can be developed to embrace the
principles embodied in the policy." EQ.
Remember that quote of Kim Beasley "you create an acceptance
of the unacceptable"? Recall also, how they tell us that mass
media does not create public opinion but only follows it? How
comfortable they are with deceit -- how barefaced they lie! The
above program started at least as far back as 1973 when the
Attorney-General announced as a policy on censorship that "federal
laws to conform with the general principles that adults should be
entitled to read, hear and view what they wished in private and in
public and that persons -- and those in their care -- be not exposed
to unsolicited material offensive to them."
Do we doubt that as the material becomes legally available it
also becomes generally available and soon can be claimed as 'not
offensive'? From this it can be argued that it is wanted by the
people -- that sexual immorality is 'victimless' crime -- that only
the stupid oppose progress!
Can we honestly doubt that undermining public morals is the
intent?
Does the 1988 quote not make clear the intent? Gradualism --
remember -- gradualism! We are being socially engineered to our
moral impotence and our mental incompetence. Our culture is now at a
stage where there is a continual, socially traumatic and expensive
pretence of taking action to repair the damage that the breakdown of
social discipline and morality is causing. They create the problems
and then pretend, at our further cost, to be trying to fix them. *
*Note: The gun laws that were said to have become necessary to
control crime. But of course such laws do not (and did not) reduce
crime, or murder or suicide; such laws only change the means of it
because it is not the guns, the cars, the bombs or the knives; not
the water of oceans or the sexuality of people: these are not the
cause of immoral, or stupid or violent and undisciplined social
behaviour. The outstanding cause of anti-social behaviour is, in our
time, the deliberate corruption of the social foundations of human
understanding -- this is a corruption with clear intent and purpose.
It is deliberate! We must understand that party governments do
not solve our problems - they cause them! The purpose of unraveling
our moral and economic social structure is to destroy community
unity and our community ability to resist the globalist take-over of
the earth.
Is the P & C infiltrated by traitors to humanity? Do you
wonder just how many socially influential organizations,
associations and groups are now actually run or controlled by their
members? We have public meetings -- few attend. We call for
volunteers for executive positions -- do you or I want the job of
looking after our own interests? No, we vote for someone who offers;
but do these kind people (often so well schooled in all the answers)
really want to work in our service? Or will they push their own
agenda? People who willingly sacrifice themselves for others are
few.
To this all-embracing social madness, add constant mass media
propaganda to violence and contempt for the discipline of moral
values on the entertainment side and constant propaganda for
humanist ideology, through political correctness, on the political
side. Is there any doubt that the corruption and destruction of the
human majority is pure and clean in the plans for the New World
Order.
Authorities follow up with such contempt for human need as to
claim it a great mystery why young people (and now older) are
behaving so irresponsibly!
They should know -- they helped contrive it!
No, it is not because these authorities (mostly parents
themselves) don't care, it is because they do not care enough to
face the horror of what they do. Pride of position, prejudice
against opposition, the arrogance of self-righteousness -- these
enforcers of ideological fiction keep them blind -- they prefer
death to (what they see as) dishonour (though their first preference
is to kill the messenger).
Their only saving grace is that "they know not what they
do". Although their behaviour is what we must expect when
life is confined to belief in the satisfaction of our animal
instincts and the human potential is hidden, they should not forget
the Biblical 'millstone around the neck' of those who lead children
astray.
Of those pushing ideology from influential positions, few will
have the courage to face that they themselves are (at least in part)
the cause of most suicides, crimes, accidents and the general social
problems of the undisciplined young. Girls are misled and boys
turned away from education; a large and increasing part of each
generation is wasted. A devastating responsibility to face.
How many parents will, when their child gets into trouble,
blame everyone and everything rather than humanist child-raising
philosophy? Discipline to good behaviour has real survival advantage
and is the best gift a parent can give a child. Discipline, properly
given, brings a loving reward. Contrary to popular opinion, life was
meant to be easy. It was the planning of arrogant people that made
it hard.
The creation of life follows a logical rather than random
pattern. Life shows a pattern of intelligent planned development; it
may be mysterious but it is not magical. Religion may suggest a God
of magic but all true creation is a creation of order -- a
discipline of energy -- a design for purpose. God did not decide,
arbitrarily, how He wanted us to live! He advised us of how we
should live to get the best results from the order in which we
exist. We were given an instruction book to go with our life-form.
Creation by intelligence is not logically challenged by politics
or science or taught by educators -- only ignored or ridiculed.
To be ignored sends out a very powerful message to the general
public -- what is ignored by the mass media cannot possibly be of
any importance and ridicule is gleefully accepted; it lets us feel
superior.
This is why they can tell us some truth but we ignore it. When
they want us to take notice they MAKE SURE WE BELIEVE IT IS
IMPORTANT -- they remind us over and over -- every mass media. Who
in Australia could ignore the Sydney Olympics? How few thought the
games were not of great social importance? Did the games advance
humanity -- civilization -- understanding -- communal welfare? Did
the games help us ESCAPE our enslavement?
They tell us we are educated to think for ourselves -- THEY LIE!
Yes THEY LIE -- they TEACH LIES and they ENCOURAGE confusion.
Surely we can see, and see why, globalists want us sick, drug
addicted, confused, financially poor, divided and helpless -- surely
we can see, over many years, the truth reflected from their actions
and that only one ending can result from this design.
I repeat:
Human life has never had better opportunities but, is the
world becoming filled with violence, misery, futility, frustration
and selfish greed because people are making life decisions on a
basis of false beliefs? I can see it! I have done the research,
if I am wrong -- show me.
Let us stay positive. Let us look at a positive way to
help clarify our political outlook.
This preamble does not,
at this time, need to be set in law, we only need to know that it
could be so set if we obey our national constitution and choose our
own parliamentary representatives.
Although the referendum for changing Australia, officially, to a
republic, was soundly defeated, the greed for power has not ended.
One way to ensure that this greed is not rewarded is to show that we
can have the kind of democratic republic we want without destroying
the advantages won by generations of struggle and suffering or the
benefits of the legal "Monarchical Republic" now
available.
A serious, legally binding preamble, is a good place for
understanding to start. The point is that, if we see that we can
have what we want legally, and without the dangers of making
despotism legal, then the agents of globalist slavery may not, so
easily, persuade us otherwise.
A nation is entitled to a precise and protective preamble! A
statement of where we come from and the ideals, principles and
values we aim to achieve -- and which lawmakers must take into
account.
Of various political offerings a Labor version starts off in the
right direction but thereafter offers no security.
I accept the Labor opening sentence.
Proposed improved Constitution preamble:
The Labor proposal starts; quote:
"Having come together in 1901 as a Federation under the
British Crown relying on the blessing of Almighty God; we, the
people of the Commonwealth of Australia, being now a sovereign
democracy of people drawn from a world-wide ancestry, proclaim our
independence and unity." End quote.
(On this introduction let us now build a responsible preamble.)
Loving our unique and ancient land;
respecting its original inhabitants;
proud of our diversity
but united in defence of our heritage of
freedom, justice and mercy;
we proclaim our independence of foreign law and
reaffirm our right to govern ourselves to create a nation dedicated
to human advance free of bondage to ideologies, political
conventions
or partisan arrogance.
Accepting our responsibilities for communal welfare,
our laws shall be bound to advance ideals of truth, freedom, justice
and mercy,
and, binding ourselves by these ideals,
we commit ourselves to renewing our historic rights and privileges
as did originally support our National Constitution.
...............................................................
Note: A National Constitution is the foundation of all our laws
and the preamble should be a simple statement of principle that is
binding in the creation and enforcement of all laws. I am not
suggesting any activity to force the government to adopt this: or to
start a new (unconstitutional) political party. Nor do I imply that
given the present system of government this preamble would be
respected if adopted. It will only be respected when the people
accept their responsibility to govern themselves (freed of partisan
or globalist 'parties'.) and choose their own electorate
representatives as is, at present, our legal Constitutional
obligation.
The point is that if people understand that they can have
something better, then perhaps they will never be tricked to vote
for something worse. Given time, we may come to understand that we
can take up our rightful role as the true power of government and no
longer be slaves and beggars.
Political parties will never approve of the above because it
binds them clearly to a high and improving moral standard that the
law must support as being the national intents and ideals when
interpreting our Constitution; this would destroy them.
Naturally the "politically correct" mass media will
also be reluctant to give public exposure to anything that may be
dangerous to the globalist establishment; the evidence may be
vigorously, even violently, denied, should it happen that the truth
cannot be contained with mass media silence.
There is, in today's world,
a web of deceit that has been growing worldwide and now covers the
whole earth. This web began with the world financial system and a
confidence trick that allowed a relatively small group of people to
tax the world. With virtually unlimited funds this has now become a
cancer infesting all of the world's biggest corporations as well as
"government" and "the world financial system". .
Another sample quote, this from Mr. Lloyd George (prominent
British Liberal statesman and Prime Minister), referring to the
peace negotiations following World War 1.(1914-18)
"They (international bankers) swept statesmen,
politicians, jurists, and journalists all on one side, and issued
their orders with the imperiousness of absolute monarchs who knew
that there was no appeal from their ruthless decrees."
End quote.
Governments bow to the great prostitution of global commerce
and finance! * Why? Do they not know that if they exposed these
crimes to the public they could arrest the criminals and their
supporters, and confiscate their illegally gained assets? Do they
hesitate because they see themselves as co-conspirators and expect
to share in the loot, or because they are too incompetent to design
the legislation and too cowardly to act intelligently without
instruction?
Well, if they need instruction they could ask the people they
pretend to represent -- I am sure that if they told the people the
truth and asked them what to do, they would quickly, and in no
uncertain terms, be told.
Any global business that the establishment does not now own or
directly control will fear to go outside set guidelines.
We may feel that to try to fight this power is useless (that is
what they want us to think). Nevertheless, it is in the nature of
things that, even if it proves that the people cannot bring
themselves to do their moral duty, then, in the end, corruption will
create its own downfall.
However, leaving the cancer to kill the host civilization and
therefore itself, will have horrendous consequences for the peoples
of the world. No matter how much pain it may cause to destroy the
cancer I believe that this is by far the best -- only then can a new
civilization grow with understanding that will ensure that this
cancer does not recur.
*Note: If you think that the great prostitution of global finance
and commerce is a secure and moral system may I suggest, as a matter
of interest, you read "REVELATIONS" 17:15 to 18:24. I
doubt you will need any interpretation to help you now you have the
clue as to what the Great Whore (that great city of Babylon)
represents. Were education not under the direction of global
interests, educators may well have understood this years ago. I use
"The New English Bible" New Testament. I do not say it
does not suffer the faults of other translations but, being written
in Modern English, should be easier to understand.
Our best chance of escaping the panic, rioting, anarchy and the
mass death and destruction to follow a world-wide economic collapse
and its effect on a misled, dependent, confused, and trusting
population, is to move first in spreading understanding that will
call the system to account.
Earlier in this treatise I
said, "the way to freedom is still an open road". The
following chilly comment by Professor John McMurtry shows, I think,
just how little of this road may remain.
This item only came to my
attention as I was preparing to sign off on this treatise; it could
not be ignored. It makes a very fitting end-piece but first let me
remind you, that the McMurtry article is copyright. Permission to
reproduce is granted if accompanied by: Copyright (c) 2000 COMER
Publications. Their web site is at: www.comer.org *
*Note: Of course, honest people will always mention the source of
copied information.
The quotes are from "A Manifesto of Corporate
Totalitarianism" by John McMurtry, Professor of Philosophy
at the University of Guelph, ON., CA. [Canada]. He is here
commenting on British PM Tony Blair speaking about Corporate
Globalization. First paragraph words those of Tony Blair; quote:
"These forces of change driving the future do not stop
at national boundaries. Don't respect tradition. They wait for no
one and no nation. They are universal." [End of Blair
quote].
"Blair's statement reveals by its sweep of assertion the
invasive forces of which he is a spokesman. His words are very
clear. Their structure deletes the subject of every sentence as
nameless, inhuman, without definition, accountable to nothing. They
affirm with no moral qualifier an occupation of societies everywhere
by "Forces" which will stop at no borders of national or
cultural identity. All that was once secure in historical time and
place is declared powerless against the transnational tide.
..........
" One might think that Blair's statement is a rhetorical
conceit. But is it, in truth, the missing key to every act of his
office? What act in his record is inconsistent with any part of it?
When has Blair, or Chretien or Clinton, ever not acted in conformity
to this belief in inevitable corporate globalization --
"waiting for no one and no nation," trampling all who do
not jump into line with its omnipotent advance."
"They are not, in fact, national leaders, but obedient
expressions of these forces of corporate globalization. Once we
understand that, we see into the directive logic of current
historical events.
..............
"We can identify the defining features of this new order's
authority by diagnosis of Blair's own words.
"(1) The forces of corporate global restructuring are
without meaning or value in their direction. For they are external
"forces" not what we care about intrinsically, and they
"drive the future" as the forces of ... gravity move the
tides. They are to be submitted to, not because they confer meaning
or give us a moral direction, but because they are all-powerful and
we cannot resist them.
"(2) The forces of corporate global restructuring are
lawless. They "don't stop at national boundaries," as all
lawful agents are obliged to do. The first principle of domestic and
international law, to respect the boundaries of others, is
overridden by these forces as the destiny of the world's future.
"(3) The forces of corporate global restructuring are
unaccountable. There is no electorate or standard of behaviour or
anything else that they answer to or have to answer to for their
domination because "they wait for no-one and no nation"
and "drive the future."
"(4) The forces of corporate global restructuring are
nihilist. For they "respect no tradition" --ethical,
legal, or cultural-- and there is no exception. ... [Civilization
is threatened].
"As we unpack the inner meaning of Blair's representative
statement, we need to ask what political leader has not acted in
conformity to the demands of these transnational corporate forces?
What "democratic" political or legal leadership yet seeks
to make accountable, or hedge in by enforced law, or raise any other
power above, or in any way morally question the transnational
corporate agenda which these forces express?
"The sad fact is that our leaders demand that we accept what
they themselves describe as lawless and unaccountable ..."
End quote. Emphasis added. Copyright (c) 2000 COMER Publications.
Well, we in Australia, who follow in some depth the political
scene, surely know that the above is true. The United Nations has
for years been downgrading borders; confusing what is ethical, legal
and cultural; mixing and confusing race to no rational or
demonstrated humane purpose; destroying tradition and human
discipline; instilling unnatural and unhealthy standards of
behaviour; allowing confidence trickery as financial practice;
promoting belief that some crimes have no victims and
misrepresenting what democracy means.
All this in the interests of shattering human values, creating
confusion and dividing opposition.
Thus, in turn, clearing the way for the "lawless and
unaccountable" corporate take-over we now call globalization.
'Politically correct' enslavement has been promoted under the
cloak of 'humanism' however, humanism is not human; it is a
deceiver's substitute.
Who, in Australia, among the leaders of state, church, law,
education, entertainment or mass media has ever raised a persuasive
voice in response to community complaint of political corruption? Or
made any serious effort to resist globalist invasion?
How few have raised a finger; or lent an ear? Or tried to
expose the lack of substance in ideology -- fought against law that
protects corporate crime -- explained the democracy sham, or money
scam, or warned of the corruption of community logic?
On the other hand how prophetic was Professor Hayek (The Road to
Serfdom 1944) when he said; quote:
".. many who think themselves infinitely superior to
the aberrations of Nazism and sincerely hate all its manifestations,
work at the same time for ideals whose realization would lead
straight to the abhorred tyranny." EQ.
We are so close to the unthinkable; a despotic, arrogant,
all-powerful world government that obeys no law and governs by its
own decree.
But is it all bad news? Are there signs the globalists are
worried? Why do they come into the open to have us told that
globalism is irresistible and inevitable; that it cannot and should
not be fought? No social movement, especially one that is without
morals and despises the humane, is either irresistible or
inevitable; every caring human has no moral choice other than to
fight this corruption.
The basic principles we are being forced to live by are
totally false -- a dictatorial World Government is a social madness!
We must see that this IS a life/death WAR! Will we surrender
humanity to be sacrificed on an inhuman altar? Read this evidence
again -- will we gamble a childish dream against life itself?
One last quote; source unknown, "Those whom the gods
would destroy they first make mad" -- let us not
surrender too soon -- let us look (to our madness) before we leap.
Let those of us who live in Australia also make this, our
anniversary year of Federation, a year for the understanding and
revival of the political ideals of our Constitution.
Thank you for your attention.
NOTE: "SLAVERY" will remain a treatise in development --
if you feel any point needs clarification please feel welcome to
e-mail: agourley@ozemail.com.au
NOTE: Please feel free to publish "SLAVERY -- The New World
Order" in full on your Website or create a new site for it.
NOTE: For initial follow up click on "Live, Life and Love
it" at: Author's
Website
