The U.N. Doesn't Want You To Know
The father of the U.N. was
an American communist
by Irvin Baxter, Jr.
A young American diplomat was the leading force in
the designing of the United Nations. He was secretary of the Dumbarten
Oaks Conversations from August to October of 1944 where most of the
preliminary planning for the U.N. was done. He was Roosevelt's right-hand
man in February of 1945 at Yalta where the postwar boundaries of Europe
were drawn (Roosevelt was a dying man at the time. His death came only ten
weeks later). At Yalta it was agreed that the Soviet Union would have
three votes (one each for Russia, Ukraine, and Byelorussia) in the U.N.
General Assembly, even though the United States had only one. At Yalta
much of Europe was placed under the iron heel of communist rule. At Yalta,
Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin appointed this young diplomatic shining
star to be the first Secretary-general of the U.N. for the founding
conference held in San Francisco,April/June of 1945.
of this seemed well and good until three years later. Alger Hiss was
exposed as a communist spy and sent to prison. Only then did people
understand why the emblem of the United Nations looked so much like the
emblem of the Soviet Union. It now made sense that the Soviet Union, at
Yalta, was given control over all of Eastern Europe. Then everyone
understood how the Soviet Union managed to capture three votes in the U.N.
General Assembly compared to one for the United States. Then it became
clear why a secret deal had been struck stating that a communist would
always hold the office of of head of the U.N. military.
The U.N. charter was authored by a communist, the
first U.N. Secretary-general was a communist, and the U.N., from the
beginning, was designed to be a Union of World Socialist Republics.
On a recent tour of the U.N., not one mention was
made of any of this by our guide. Hiss' name was not mentioned one time.
When pictures of the founding conference contained his picture, our U.N.
guide avoided telling us who it was.
I'm sure everyone was taught about the United
Nations and its importance in school, but I'm also sure that the above
information was conveniently omitted from your textbooks!
agreement: U.N. military to always be commanded by a
One of the most important positions within the entire United Nations—if
not the most important—is that of Undersecretary-general for Political
and Security Council Affairs. Most Americans have never even heard of this
less anything about the man who holds the job. The undersecretary-general
for political and security council affairs has three main areas of
responsibility. They are:
- Control of all military and police functions of
the United Nations peacekeeping forces.
- Supervision of all disarmament moves on the part
of member nations
- Control of all atomic energy ultimately entrusted
to the United nations for peaceful and “other purposes”.
In view of the fact that these three functions may
soon constitute the ultimate power of life and death over every human
being on the face of the earth (once national disarmament is achieved and
all military is under the control of the U.N.), there would appear to be
some minor justification for us to be more than passingly curious over who
wields this power. Since the United Nations was created in 1945 there have
been fifteen men appointed to the position of undersecretary-general of
political and security council affairs. Astonishingly, every single one of
them has been a communist!
Communists appointed to the position of
- Arkady Sobolev--USSR (1946-1949)
- Konstantin Zinchenko—USSR (1949-53)
- Ilya Tehernychev—Ygoslavia
- Anatoly F. Dobrynin—USSR (1958-1960)
- Georgi Ptrovich Arkadev—USSR
- Eugeny Dmiterievich Kiselev—USSR
- Vladimir Pavolovich Suslov—USSR
- Alexie E. Nesterenko—USSR (1965-1968)
- Leonid N. Kutakov—USSR (1968-1973)
- Arkady N. Shevchenko—USSR (1973-1978)
- Mikhail D. Sytenko—USSR (1978-1981)
- Viacheslav A. Ustinov—USSR
- Uasiliy S. Safronchuk—USSR
- Vladimir Petrovsky—Russia , “former
- James O. C. Jonah—Sierra Leone
Some observers feel that fifteen Communists out of
fifteen appointees constitutes a trend of sorts. But whatever we call it,
Trygve Lie, the first secretary-general of the United Nations, revealed
that this pattern was no mere coincidence. In his book In the cause of
Peace Lie wrote: "Mr. Vyshinsky (of the USSR) did not delay his
approach. He was the first to inform me of an understanding which the Big
Five had reached in London on the appointment of a Soviet national as
assistant secretary-general for political and security council affairs...
"Mr. Stettinius (U.S Secretary of State)
confirmed to me that he had agreed with the Soviet delegation in the
"The preservation of international peace and
security was the organization's highest responsibility, and it was to
entrusting the direction of the Secretariat department most concerned with
this to a Soviet national that the Americans had agreed." (From The
Fearful Master by Edward Griffin)
Secretary-general has been a socialist
No wonder someone said that the truth is stranger than fiction! This
incredible saga of the United Nations just goes on and on. Perhaps the
most revealing fact of all concerning the powers that control the United
Nations is that every single Secretary-general since the U.N.'s formation
has been a socialist.
Trygve Lie from Norway was the
first elected head of the U.N. He was chosen by the fifteen-member U.N.
Security Council and ratified by the U.N. General Assembly on February
Lie, at the age of twenty-three, was appointed
secretary in charge of administration of the Norwegian Labor Party. The
socialist lawyer served as Minister of Justice until June 1939, when a
Cabinet reorganization made him Minister of Commerce. In April 1945, Lie
was chosen to head the Norwegian delegation to the United Nations
Founding Conference at San Francisco. At the conference itself he was
chosen chairman of Commission III which was charged with drafting the
charter of the Security Council of the United Nations, "the
organ...which would have the power to act against aggressors."
Dag Hammarskjold of Sweden was
elected Secretary-general of the United Nations on April 7, 1953. At the
age of thirty, Hammarskjold became Undersecretary of the Swedish
Ministry of Finance. At the Ministry
he worked under the Fabian socialist economist Ernst Wigforss, whom he
once said considered his second father. Sweden has long been the leading
socialist state of Western Europe, taxing its citizens at a 75% rate.
U Thant of Burma was elected
Secretary-general of the U.N. on November 30, 1962. According to Current
Biography 1962, U Thant considered himself a democratic socialist.
Kurt Waldheim of Austria took
office as Secretary-general of the United Nations on January 1, 1972.
Waldheim had been Austria's U.N. ambassador from 1964 to 1968. When the
Austrian Socialist party won the March 1970 elections, Waldheim again
became Austria's U.N. representative. After serving two terms as U.N.
Secretary-general, Waldheim became the head of Austria. It was revealed
that Waldheim had lied about his role while serving in the Nazi forces
of Adolf Hitler. Facts that were made known resulted in Waldheim being
banished from the United States, even though he was the head of Austria.
Javier Perez de Cuellar became
U.N. Secretary-general on December 15, 1981. In his address to the
General Assembly after being sworn in, Perez de Cuellar called the
disparity in wealth between rich and poor nations a violation of
"the most fundamental human rights." During his
administration, some third-world spokesmen complained that Perez de
Cuellar had not been sufficiently outspoken in promoting the massive
transfer of resources from rich to poor nations on a global scale
(Wealth redistribution has always been the central plank in the platform
of international socialism). "I am a third-world man," the
Secretary-general replied. "But first of all I am a representative
of 157 countries. I have to act in a way so that I am not only the
representative of the third world."
Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the former
foreign minister of Egypt, became the first African to head the U.N. on
January 1, 1992. "If I was offered the job (of secretary-general)
five years ago," Ghali said, "I would have turned it down. The
U.N. then was a dead horse, but after the end of the Cold War, the U.N.
has a special position." Politically, Boutros-Ghali was a member of
the Arab Socialist Union.
Is it coincidence that one communist and six
socialists have headed the United Nations since its birth in 1945? Does it
seem strange at all that the driving message of the U.N., the message of
wealth redistribution, is the central message of international communism?
Do you find it amazing that the United States has allowed the Soviet Union
to have three votes to our one in
the United Nations since 1945? With the supposed dissolution of the Soviet
Union in 1992, each of the fifteen member of the ex-Soviet Union now have
a vote in the U.N. So now we are outvoted fifteen to one. Yet Russia
retains the right to invade these states if they get out of line.
So what does all this mean? the plain truth is that
the United Nations has been designed to be a communistic world government
from its very beginning.
What will happen? The United Nations will obtain the
world domination that it has been planning for since its beginning.
Communism will achieve its dream of ruling the world, but only for a very
short time. We know this because the New World Order beast of Revelation
13 appears in another prophecy in Revelation 17. In Revelation 17:3 the
beast is red. Red is used by
God in another prophecy Communism (See chapter 3 of A Message for the
President). And why not?! Red is the official color denoting
Communism—Red China, Red Russia, et al.
There are some dreadful times just ahead for this
world. The consolation is that the deep darkness that lies just ahead will
soon be replaced by the glorious dawning of the kingdom of our Lord and
savior Jesus Christ. And He shall reign forever!!